诊断学理论与实践 ›› 2025, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (02): 187-193.doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2025.02.010
收稿日期:
2024-09-25
接受日期:
2025-04-10
出版日期:
2025-04-25
发布日期:
2025-07-11
通讯作者:
肖立 E-mail: fangjx0207@foxmail.com
WANG Lei, JIN Jingjing, YU Na, XIAO Li()
Received:
2024-09-25
Accepted:
2025-04-10
Published:
2025-04-25
Online:
2025-07-11
摘要:
目的: 探讨BRAFV600E 突变在甲状腺结节细胞学诊断(fine-needle aspiration cytology, FNAC)中的分布特征,分析FNAC联合BRAFV600E 突变检测在甲状腺乳头状癌(papillary thyroid carcinoma, PTC)术前诊断中的价值。 方法: 回顾性分析2021年11月至2024年1月期间,在复旦大学附属华东医院接受甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学检查的261个连续甲状腺结节,所有结节均采用扩增阻滞突变系统-聚合酶链式反应(amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction, ARMS-PCR)法检测BRAF、TERT、RET、HRAS、KRAS、NRAS、PPARG和NTRK基因突变。分析BRAFV600E 突变在甲状腺细胞病理学Bethesda报告系统(the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology, TBSRTC)不同类别结节中的分布。69/261个甲状腺结节经术后病理检查,其中65个甲状腺结节诊断为PTC,余3个为滤泡性肿瘤和1个为滤泡性结节。以术后病理诊断为金标准,分析FNAC结合BRAFV600E 突变检测在术前诊断PTC的价值。 结果: 261个FNAC样本中,98个甲状腺结节BRAFV600E 阳性,78.6%的阳性样本分布于TBSRTC Ⅴ、Ⅵ类。FNAC、BRAF突变检测以及FNAC联合BRAF突变检测鉴别PTC的准确率分别为76.8%、81.2%、89.9%,灵敏度分别为76.9%、80.0%、90.8%,特异度分别为75.0%、100.0%、75.0%,各方法的受试者操作特征(receiver operator characteristic, ROC)曲线的曲线下面积(area under curve, AUC)分别为0.759 6、0.900 0、0.828 8。Z检验结果显示,FNAC结合BRAFV600E 突变检测的AUC值较FNAC有所提高(P=0.008 2)。 结论: 78.6%的BRAFV600E 突变阳性病例位于细胞学TBSRTC Ⅴ、Ⅵ类,其可作为PTC高风险结节诊断的重要补充依据。相比于FNAC单独诊断,FNAC联合BRAFV600E 突变检测可提高甲状腺乳头状癌的术前诊断准确率。
中图分类号:
王蕾, 金晶晶, 余纳, 肖立. BRAFV600E 突变在甲状腺结节细胞学样本中的分布及其临床应用价值[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2025, 24(02): 187-193.
WANG Lei, JIN Jingjing, YU Na, XIAO Li. Distribution of BRAFV600E mutation in cytological samples of thyroid nodules and its clinical application value[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2025, 24(02): 187-193.
表1
基于TBSRTC分类的261个甲状腺结节中BRAF基因突变情况
TBSRTC | Case number(%) | BRAF positive (%) | BRAF negative (%) | BRAF positive/ Total positive (%) | BRAF negative/ Total negative (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 10/261(3.8) | 2/10(20.0) | 8/10(80.0) | 2/98(2.0) | 8/163(4.9) |
Ⅱ | 109/261(41.8) | 6/109(5.5) | 103/109(94.5) | 6/98(6.1) | 103/163(63.2) |
Ⅲ | 42/261(16.1) | 12/42(28.6) | 30/42(71.4) | 12/98(12.2) | 30/163(18.4) |
Ⅳ | 9/261(3.4) | 1/9(11.1) | 8/9(88.9) | 1/98(1.0) | 8/163(4.9) |
Ⅴ | 40/261(15.3) | 30/40(75.0) | 10/40(25.0) | 30/98(30.6) | 10/163(6.1) |
Ⅵ | 51/261(19.5) | 47/51(92.2) | 4/51(7.8) | 47/98(48.0) | 4/163(2.5) |
Total | 261/261 (100.0) | 98/261 (37.5) | 163/261 (62.5) | 98/98 (100.0) | 163/163 (100.0) |
表2
基于TBSRTC分类的261例甲状腺结节的基因突变分布特征
TBSRTC | BRAF positive(%) | RAS positive(%) | TERT C228T positive(%) | CCDC6-RET fusion(%) | ETV6-NTRK3 fusion(%) | Wildtype (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 2/10(20.0) | 1/10(10.0) | 0/10(0) | 0/10(0) | 0/10(0) | 7/10(70.0) |
Ⅱ | 6/109(5.5) | 2/109(1.8) | 1/109(0.9) | 0/109(0) | 1/109(0.9) | 99/109(90.8) |
Ⅲ | 12/42(28.6) | 1/42(2.4) | 0/42(0) | 1/42(2.4) | 0/42(0) | 28/42(66.7) |
Ⅳ | 1/9(11.1) | 0/9(0) | 0/9(0) | 1/9(11.1) | 1/9(11.1) | 6/9(66.7) |
Ⅴ | 30/40(75.0) | 2/40(5.0) | 2/40(5.0) | 1/40(2.5) | 1/40(2.5) | 7/40(17.5) |
Ⅵ | 47/51(92.2) | 0/51(0) | 0/51(0) | 0/51(0) | 0/51(0) | 4/51(7.8) |
Total | 98/261 (37.5) | 6/261 (2.3) | 3/261 (1.1) | 3/261 (1.1) | 3/261 (1.1) | 151/261 (57.9) |
[1] |
CHEN D W, LANG B H H, MCLEOD D S A, et al. Thyroid cancer[J]. Lancet,2023,401(10387):1531-1544.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00020-X pmid: 37023783 |
[2] | XIE L, WANG S, QIAN Y, et al. Increasing gap between thyroid cancer incidence and mortality in urban Shanghai, China: an analysis spanning 43 years[J]. Endocr Pract,2021,27(11):1100-1107. |
[3] | CHENG F, XIAO J, SHAO C, et al. Burden of thyroid cancer from 1990 to 2019 and projections of incidence and mortality until 2039 in China: findings from global burden of disease study[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne),2021,12:738213. |
[4] | GONG Y, JIANG Q, ZHAI M, et al. Thyroid cancer trends in China and its comparative analysis with G20 countries: Projections for 2020-2040[J]. J Glob Health,2024,14: 04131. |
[5] | DURANTE C, HEGEDUS L, CZARNIECKA A, et al. 2023 European Thyroid Association Clinical Practice Guidelines for thyroid nodule management[J]. Eur Thyroid J, 2023, 12(5). |
[6] | ALEXANDER E K, CIBAS E S. Diagnosis of thyroid nodules[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol,2022,10(7):533-539. |
[7] | BONGIOVANNI M, BELLEVICINE C, TRONCONE G, et al. Approach to cytological indeterminate thyroid nodules[J]. Gland Surg,2019,8():S98-S104. |
[8] | COZZANI F, BETTINI D, ROSSINI M, et al. Thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology: association between nodule size, histopathological characteristics and clinical outcome in differentiated thyroid carcinomas - a multicenter retrospective cohort study on 761 patients[J]. Updates Surg,2021,73(5):1923-1930. |
[9] | WEI X, WANG X, XIONG J, et al. Risk and prognostic factors for BRAF(V600E) mutations in papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Biomed Res Int,2022,2022:9959649. |
[10] | SCHEFFEL R S, DORA J M, MAIA A L. BRAF mutations in thyroid cancer[J]. Curr Opin Oncol,2022,34(1):9-18. |
[11] | HERNANDEZ B Y, RAHMAN M, LOO L W M, et al. BRAF(V600E), hypothyroidism, and human relaxin in thyroid carcinogenesis[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol,2021,147(1):183-194. |
[12] |
VAN GERWEN M, CERUTTI JM, MENDES TB, et al. TERT and BRAF V600E mutations in thyroid cancer of World Trade Center Responders[J]. Carcinogenesis,2023,44(4):350-355.
doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgad029 pmid: 37144982 |
[13] | CHEN H, SONG A, WANG Y, et al. BRAF(V600E) mutation test on fine-needle aspiration specimens of thyroid nodules: Clinical correlations for 4600 patients[J]. Cancer Med,2022,11(1):40-49. |
[14] |
BALOCH Z W, ASA S L, BARLETTA J A, et al. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Thyroid Neoplasms[J]. Endocr Pathol,2022,33(1):27-63.
doi: 10.1007/s12022-022-09707-3 pmid: 35288841 |
[15] | HADDAD R I, BISCHOFF L, BALL D, et al. Thyroid Carcinoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2022,20(8):925-951. |
[16] | 李玉姝, 单忠艳, 滕卫平. 《甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌诊治指南(第二版)》解读[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2023, 43(11): 884-889. |
LI Y S, SHAN Z Y, TENG W P, et al. Interpretation of the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer(second edition)[J]. Chin J Pract Intern Med,2023,43(11):884-889. | |
[17] | 甲状腺细针穿刺细胞病理学诊断专家共识编写组, 中华医学会病理学分会细胞病理学组. 甲状腺细针穿刺细胞病理学诊断专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华病理学杂志,2023,52(5):441-446. |
Expert Committee of the Consensus on the Cytopathological Diagnosis of Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration; Section Cyto-logy, Chinese Society of Pathology. Expert consensus on the cytopathological diagnosis of thyroid fine needle aspiration(version 2023)[J]. Chin J Pathol,2023,52(5):441-446. | |
[18] | MAYSON S E, HAUGEN B R. Molecular diagnostic evaluation of thyroid nodules[J]. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am,2019,48(1):85-97. |
[19] | WANG Z, YAO Q, BAO L, et al. Clinicopathological features of CCDC6-RET and NCOA4-RET fusions in thyroid cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study in a Chinese population[J]. Thyroid,2024,34(10):1260-1270. |
[20] | PRETE A, BORGES DE SOUZA P, CENSI S, et al. Update on fundamental mechanisms of thyroid cancer[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne),2020,11:102. |
[21] | OKUBO Y, TODA S, KADOYA M, et al. Clinicopathological analysis of thyroid carcinomas with the RET and NTRK fusion genes: characterization for genetic analysis[J]. Virchows Arch,2024,485(3):509-518. |
[22] | BELLEVICINE C, MIGLIATICO I, SGARIGLIA R, et al. Evaluation of BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, and PAX8/PPARg alterations in different Bethesda diagnostic categories: A multicentric prospective study on the validity of the 7-gene panel test in 1172 thyroid FNAs deriving from diffe-rent hospitals in South Italy[J]. Cancer Cytopathol,2020, 128(2):107-118. |
[23] | TANG J, MA J, XI X, et al. Real-life utility of five-gene panel test in preoperative thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a large cohort of 740 patients study[J]. Endocrine,2023,80(3):552-562. |
[24] | 赵丽辉, 孙世珺, 易冰, 等. FNAC联合BRAF V600E基因突变检测在甲状腺乳头状癌诊断中的作用及临床意义[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志, 2022, 14(04): 669-672, 676. |
ZHAO L H, SUN S J, YI B, et al. The role and clinical significance of FNAC combined with BRAF V600E mutation detection in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. J Mol Diagn Ther,2022,14(4):669-672, 676. |
[1] | 王文涵, 夏蜀珺, 詹维伟. 长链非编码RNA ENST00000489676在超声评估甲状腺乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移中的应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(04): 514-519. |
[2] | 徐子真, 李擎天, 刘湘帆, 李莉, 李惠, 王也飞, 吴洁敏, 陈宁, 梁璆荔, 陈松立, 戴健敏, 宋珍, 丁磊. 实验诊断学在线课程的建立和实践[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(04): 547-550. |
[3] | 徐琛莹, 李嫣然, 倪晓枫, 徐上妍, 林青. 超声预测老年甲状腺乳头状癌患者颈部淋巴结转移的效能及相关超声征象分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(03): 343-348. |
[4] | 况李君, 陶玲玲, 詹维伟, 李伟伟, 樊金芳, 周伟. 负压细针抽吸和毛细抽吸活检法穿刺洗脱液中甲状腺球蛋白测定在甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移中的诊断价值比较[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(04): 367-371. |
[5] | 郑捷. 从上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院皮肤科的发展看实验诊断学对提高皮肤病诊疗能力的重要性[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(02): 144-148. |
[6] | 杨一娴, 倪仲馨, 夏蜀珺, 周伟, 詹维伟. 多灶性与单灶性甲状腺乳头状癌的临床病理特征及超声表现的比较[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(02): 168-172. |
[7] | 王星, 汪蓉晖, 张桂萍, 董屹婕, 周伟, 詹维伟. 10 388个甲状腺结节行超声引导下细针抽吸活检的甲状腺癌各亚型诊断准确率的10年研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(04): 359-363. |
[8] | 秦绪珍, 张时民, 于连辉, 齐志宏, 刘亚丽, 徐英春. 北京协和医科大学八年制医学本科生实验诊断学实验课教学改革的调研[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(04): 438-440. |
[9] | . 《诊断学理论与实践》杂志[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(02): 209-. |
[10] | 杜月月, 杜军, 沈倩, 葛绾宇, 吴海波. Warthin瘤样甲状腺乳头状癌1例及临床病理观察[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(02): 188-190. |
[11] | . 《诊断学理论与实践》[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(2): 241-. |
[12] | . 《诊断学理论与实践》医学科技术语缩写名录[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(2): 0-. |
[13] | 杨巧, 王佩, 王璐. 甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学诊断霍奇金淋巴瘤1例[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(2): 215-217. |
[14] | . 《诊断学理论与实践》医学科技术语缩写名录[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(1): 0-. |
[15] | 冯一梅, 陈小丽, 张曦. 国内诊断学PBL教学法对临床医学生学习效果影响的荟萃分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(05): 595-601. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||