Comparison of pregnancy outcome of frozen-thawed embryo plantation with two different endometrial preparation in patients with history of ectopic pregnancy

doi:10.16150/j.1671-2870.2017.02.017

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effect of different endometrial preparation on outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) frozen-thawed embryo plantation in patients with history of ectopic pregnancy. Methods: Data from 914 patients with history of ectopic pregnancy who underwent IVF/ICSI frozen-thawed embryo plantation from January 2012 to December 2014 were collected. Patients undergoing natural cycles and those undergoing artificial cycles were matched into 379 pairs by propensity score matching. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two matched groups of patients. Results: The basic characteristics including maternal age, body mass index, full-term birth history, primary or secondary infertility, previous tubal surgery history, infertility diagnosis, endometrial thickness on embryo plantation day, number and stage of embryos planted, and year of treatment were not significantly different between the two groups (P>; 0.05). As for pregnancy outcome, the ectopic pregnancy rate of the two groups was not significantly different (5.2% vs.7.5%, P>; 0.05). Moreover, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, delivery rate, miscarriage rate, and multiple pregnancy rate of the two groups were also not significantly different (P>; 0.05). Conclusions: In IVF/ICSI frozen-thawed embryo plantation, natural cycles and artificial cycles have similar effect on recurrence risk of ectopic pregnancy, and have comparable pregnancy outcome.

Key words: In vitro fertilization, Ectopic pregnancy, Natural cycles, Artificial cycles, Frozen-thawed embryo plantation

CLC Number:

R713.8

DU Tong, LYU Qifeng. Comparison of pregnancy outcome of frozen-thawed embryo plantation with two different endometrial preparation in patients with history of ectopic pregnancy[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2017, 16(02): 208-212.

References

[1] Refaat B, Dalton E, Ledger WL.Ectopic pregnancy secon-dary to in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: pathogenic mechanisms and management strategies[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol,2015,13:30.
[2] Li Z, Sullivan EA, Chapman M, et al.Risk of ectopic pregnancy lowest with transfer of single frozen blastocyst[J]. Hum Reprod,2015,30(9):2048-2054.
[3] Shaw JL, Dey SK, Critchley HO, et al.Current know-ledge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy[J]. Hum Reprod Update,2010,16(4):432-444.
[4] Marion LL, Meeks GR.Ectopic pregnancy: History, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2012,55(2):376-386.
[5] Weigert M, Gruber D, Pernicka E, et al.Previous tubal ectopic pregnancy raises the incidence of repeated ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet,2009,26(1):13-17.
[6] Zhang YL, Sun J, Su YC, et al.Ectopic pregnancy in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of 4,034 cycles and related factors[J]. Syst Biol Reprod Med,2013,59(1):34-37.
[7] Richter KS, Ginsburg DK, Shipley SK, et al.Factors associated with birth outcomes from cryopreserved blastocysts: experience from 4,597 autologous transfers of 7,597 cryopreserved blastocysts[J]. Fertil Steril,2016, 106(2):354-362.
[8] Stehlik E, Stehlik J, Katayama KP, et al.Vitrification demonstrates significant improvement versus slow freezi-ng of human blastocysts[J]. Reprod Biomed Online,2005, 11(1):53-57.
[9] Savasi V, Leone FP, Fusè F, et al.Assisted reproductive technologies and uterine factors influencing their success[J]. Minerva Ginecol,2013,65(5):505-524.
[10] Londra L, Moreau C, Strobino D, et al.Ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: differences between fresh and frozen-thawed cycles[J]. Fertil Steril,2015,104(1):110-118.
[11] Perkins KM, Boulet SL, Kissin DM, et al.Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001-2011[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2015,125(1):70-78.
[12] Trounson A, Mohr L.Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo[J]. Nature, 1983,305(5936):707-709.
[13] Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Hunter HR, et al.Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study[J]. Fertil Steril,2006,85(3):603-609.
[14] Ghobara T, Vandekerckhove P. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2008,(1):CD003414.
[15] Roque M.Freeze-all policy: is it time for that?[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet,2015,32(2):171-176.
[16] Roque M, Valle M, Guimarães F, et al.Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer[J]. Fertil Steril,2015,103(5):1190-1193.
[17] Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H,et al.Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles[J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 99(2):389-392.
[18] Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AE, Kollen BJ, et al.What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hum Reprod Update,2013,19(5):458-470.
[19] Acharya KS, Acharya CR, Provost MP, et al.Ectopic pregnancy rate increases with the number of retrieved oocytes in autologous in vitro fertilization with non-tubal infertility but not donor/recipient cycles: an analysis of 109,140 clinical pregnancies from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry[J]. Fertil Steril, 2015, 104(4):873-878.
[20] Ankum WM, Mol BW, van der Veen F, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 1996,65(6):1093-1099.
[21] Karaer A, Avsar FA, Batioglu S.Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol,2006,46(6):521-527.
[22] Xu Z, Yan L, Liu W, et al.Effect of treatment of a pre-vious ectopic pregnancy on in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Fertil Steril,2015,104(6):1446-1455.
[23] Whittaker W, Anselmi L, Kristensen SR, et al.Associations between extending access to primary care and emergency department visits: A difference-in-differences analysis[J]. PLoS Med,2016,13(9):e1002113.
[24] Shaw JL, Dey SK, Critchley HO, et al.Current knowled-ge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy[J]. Hum Reprod Update,2010,16(4):432-444.