Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice >
The clinical evaluation and optimization of alarm Threshold setting for Sysmex UF5000 UTI
Received date: 2019-12-12
Online published: 2020-04-25
Objective: To explore and optimize the settings of alarm in Sysmex UF5000 urinary tract infection (UTI) system to assist the diagnosis of UTI. Methods: A total of 2 871 urine samples were collected and tested by Sysmex UF5000 urine sediment analyzer. The diagnostic accurate rate, sensitivity, and specificity of the default alarm threshold settings of the instrument for UTI were calculated regarding to the clinical diagnosis of UTI. The thresholds of white blood cell count (WBC) and bacterial count (BACT) were optimized to meet the local hospital need. Results: The accurate rate of instrumental alarm settings for diagnosing UTI was 70.61%, with a sensitivity of 94.23% and specificity of 70.61%. At the default setting, the diagnostic sensitivities of WBC (WBC>10/μL) and BACT (BACT>10/μL) were 94.23% and 94.12%, while specificities were 58.02% and 68.98%. The optimal cutoff values for WBC and BACT determined by ROC curve were 24.9/μL and 1 157.3/μL, respectively. However, when sensitivities of WBC and BACT were set as 95%, the specificities of both parameters were 56.8% and 57.01%, yielding the cut-off values as 26.7/μL and 60.1/μL, respectively. Clinical validation showed that best sensitivity and specificity of the system was achieved(sensitivity 93.34%, specificity 71.17%) when the WBC and BACT were reset at 26.7/μL and 1 157.3/μL, respectively. Conclusion: Optimized the alarm threshold of the Sysmex UF5000 achieve higher sensitivity and specificity, assisting rapid diagnosis of clinical UTI.
CHEN Chen, ZHANG Yue, HU Xiaobo . The clinical evaluation and optimization of alarm Threshold setting for Sysmex UF5000 UTI[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2020 , 19(02) : 168 -171 . DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2020.02.013
[1] | Choe H S, Lee S J, Yang S S, et al. Summary of the UAA-AAUS guidelines for urinary tract infections[J]. Int J Urol, 2018, 25(3):175-185. |
[2] | 陈瑾, 李荣亨. 尿路感染的诊治进展[J]. 中国中西医结合肾病杂志, 2003, 4(11):676-677. |
[3] | Nicolle LE. Urinary tract infection[J]. Crit Care Clin, 2013, 29(3):699-715. |
[4] | 余毅. 泌尿系统常见的医院感染及其控制[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2002, 18(1):13-14. |
[5] | 殷琳, 喻华, 乔宁, 等. 四川省细菌耐药监测网2011-2012年尿路感染病原菌分布及耐药分析[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2014, 22:3019-3021,3024. |
[6] | 中国女医师协会肾脏病与血液净化专委会. 中国女性尿路感染诊疗专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(36):2827-2832. |
[7] | 尿路感染诊断与治疗中国专家共识编写组. 尿路感染诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2015版)——复杂性尿路感染[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 36(4):241-244. |
[8] | 黄伟文, 王芳. 尿路感染的实验室诊断进展[J]. 当代医学, 2015(8):17-18,19. |
[9] | 张全贵. 尿路感染的治疗进展[J]. 国外医学:泌尿系统分册(4期):152-155. |
[10] | 王燕凤, 赖小华, 黄印翔. Sysmex UF5000全自动尿液有形成分分析仪的主要性能研究[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2018, 31(22):115-117. |
[11] | 张昭勇, 杨宏伟, 罗卉丽. Sysmex UF-1000i白细胞和细菌计数阈值的建立及其筛选尿路感染的价值[J]. 中国医药导报, 2016, 13(25):142-145. |
[12] | 徐树. 尿沉渣白细胞及细菌定量计数联合检测与尿细菌培养诊断尿路感染的比较[J]. 现代养生B, 2014, 4:139. |
[13] | 罗岚, 何超, 李冬冬, 等. UF-1000i尿沉渣分析仪在排除尿路感染中的应用评价[J]. 华西医学, 2013, 7:70-72. |
[14] | Evans R, Davidson MM, Sim LR, et al. Testing by Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and with bacterial culture in a diagnostic laboratory: a comparison[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2006, 59(6):661-662. |
[15] | 冯敏亚, 史伟峰. UC-3500与UF-5000流水线分析系统在诊断尿路感染中的价值[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2019, 16(12):1737-1740. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |