Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice >
Lung cancer screening by low-dose CT in asymptomatic population undergoing physical examination: preliminary analysis of 22 351 cases in Shanghai
Received date: 2018-09-20
Online published: 2019-04-25
Objective: To analyze the results of low-dose CT(LDCT) screening for lung cancer in asymptomatic patients. Methods: From April 2015 to April 2018, 22 351 asymptomatic patients(16—95 years old) underwent lung LDCT examination. According to the size and type of nodules, they were divided into positive nodules, semi-positive nodules and negative nodules. The results of LDCT lung nodule detection and lung cancer screening in different age groups and gender groups were analyzed. Detection of different types of nodule in positive and semi-positive nodules was analyzed too. The changes of nodule during follow-up were recorded. Results: The total detection rate of pulmonary nodule was 31%. The detection rates in male and female were 34.1% and 28.8%, respectively; the difference was significant ( χ2=70.47, P<0.001). The detection rate of nodule was different in different age groups, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=1 032.96, P<0.001). The older the age group, the higher the detection rate of nodule. The detection rate of nodule in 81—95 age group was the highest (50.0%). The detection rate of positive nodules was different in different genders, the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=184.36, P<0.001). The detection rate of positive nodules in male population (10.1%) was higher than that in female group (8.6%). The detection rate of positive nodules was different in different age groups, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2= 434.89, P<0.001). The overall detection rate of lung cancer was 0.4%. Forty-eight cases of lung cancer were detected by baseline screening, and 47 cases of lung cancer were detected by follow-up within 36 months. There was a significant difference in detection rate of lung cancer between different genders ( χ2=7.52, P=0.006). The detection rate of lung cancer in male and female was about 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. The detection rate of lung cancer in patients over 50 years old was significantly higher than those under 50 years old, and the detection rate was about 0.7% and 0.1%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant ( χ2=42.20, P=0.006). P<0.001). The detection rates of lung cancer in positive and semi-positive nodule groups were 4.5% and 0.1%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant ( χ2=207.78, P<0.001). The proportion of positive and semi-positive nodule in nodules of different density types was different ( χ2=267.06, P<0.001). The detection rate of malignant nodule in different density types was different, the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=131.77, P<0.001). The detection rate of malignant nodule in part-solid nodules was high, up to 4.3%. During the follow-up period, 4 557 patients with semi-positive nodules underwent annual review or biennial review, and only 2 patients were pathologically confirmed as early lung cancer. Malignant nodules accounted for 0.7% of the detected nodules.Conclusions: LDCT lung cancer screening is very important for middle-aged and elderly people, especially those over 50 years old. For semi-positive nodules, annual review is feasible. For the screened pulmonary nodules, the overall proportion of malignant nodules (0.7%) is low. A reasonable follow-up management plan should be formulated according to the size, type and morphological characteristics of nodules.
Key words: Pulmonary nodules; Screening; Low-dose CT
ZHAO Junsong, CUI Li, HE Jiangbo, ZHU Xiaoyun, LIU Lihong, HUANG Wei, XU Xueqin, CHEN Kemin . Lung cancer screening by low-dose CT in asymptomatic population undergoing physical examination: preliminary analysis of 22 351 cases in Shanghai[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019 , 18(2) : 183 -188 . DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2019.02.012
[1] | Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2):115-132. |
[2] | Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2014[R/OL]. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute. 2017[2018-09-20].https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014/. |
[3] | Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(4):271-289. |
[4] | Higuchi M, Yaginuma H, Yonechi A, et al. Long-term outcomes after video-assisted thoracic surgery(VATS) lobectomy versus lobectomy via open thoracotomy for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 9:88. |
[5] | New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project Investigators. CT Screening for lung cancer: diagnoses resulting from the New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project[J]. Radiology, 2007, 243(1):239-249. |
[6] | Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(1):5-29. |
[7] | Patz EF Jr, Greco E, Gatsonis C, et al. Lung cancer incidence and mortality in National Lung Screening Trial participants who underwent low-dose CT prevalence screening: a retrospective cohort analysis of a randomised, multicentre, diagnostic screening trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2016, 17(5):590-599. |
[8] | 望云, 范丽, 周莹, 等. 上海地区低剂量CT筛查肺癌基线初步报告[J]. 中华健康管理学杂志, 2018, 12(1):51-54. |
[9] | National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Church TR, Black WC, et al. Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 368(21):1980-1991. |
[10] | Field JK, Duffy SW, Baldwin DR, et al. UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening[J]. Thorax, 2016, 71(2):161-170. |
[11] | Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR, et al. Long-Term Follow-up Results of the DANTE Trial, a Randomized Study of Lung Cancer Screening with Spiral Computed Tomography[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015, 191(10):1166-1175. |
[12] | Horeweg N, Scholten ET, de Jong PA, et al. Detection of lung cancer through low-dose CT screening (NELSON): a prespecified analysis of screening test performance and interval cancers[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(12):1342-1350. |
[13] | 高忠嵩, 叶兆祥, 张鹏, 等. 天津地区低剂量CT肺癌基线筛查与随访的初步临床分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2017, 44(20):1034-1039. |
[14] | 周清华, 范亚光, 王颖, 等. 中国肺癌低剂量螺旋CT筛查指南(2018年版)[J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2018, 21(2):67-75. |
[15] | Horeweg N, van Rosmalen J, Heuvelmans MA, et al. Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(12):1332-1341. |
[16] | Pastorino U, Rossi M, Rosato V, et al. Annual or biennial CT screening versus observation in heavy smokers: 5-year results of the MILD trial[J]. Eur J Cancer Prev, 2012, 21(3):308-315. |
[17] | Snoeckx A, Reyntiens P, Desbuquoit D, et al. Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule: size matters, but do not ignore the power of morphology[J]. Insights Imaging, 2018, 9(1):73-86. |
[18] | Walter JE, Heuvelmans MA, de Jong PA, et al. Occurrence and lung cancer probability of new solid nodules at incidence screening with low-dose CT: analysis of data from the randomised, controlled NELSON trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2016, 17(7):907-916. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |