激活素A对胃癌细胞迁移和有氧糖酵解的影响
收稿日期: 2022-01-13
网络出版日期: 2022-08-08
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(8157100762)
Effects of activin A on migration and aerobic glycolysis of gastric cancer cells
Received date: 2022-01-13
Online published: 2022-08-08
目的: 探索转化生长因子-β超家族细胞因子激活素A(activin A)对胃癌细胞迁移和有氧糖酵解的影响,及其编码基因抑制素βA亚基(inhibin βA, INHBA)表达水平与胃癌患者预后的相关性。方法: 用不同浓度激活素 A处理胃癌细胞,蛋白质免疫印迹(Western blotting,Wb)检测激活素信号通路下游磷酸化Smad2/3(phosphorylated Smad2/3,pSmad2/3)水平上调情况,确定合适的激活素 A作用浓度。Transwell和划痕实验评价激活素 A对胃癌细胞迁移的影响,检测乳酸生成和葡萄糖摄取探索激活素 A对胃癌细胞有氧糖酵解的影响。癌症基因组图谱(the Cancer Genome Atlas,TCGA)数据库基因表达水平相关性分析联合Wb验证,探索激活素 A可能影响哪些上皮间质转化(epithelial mesenchymal transformation, EMT)和糖酵解相关基因。利用TCGA、基因表达综合数据库(Gene Expression Omnibus,GEO)等公共数据库分析INHBA在胃癌组织和癌旁胃黏膜组织中表达的差异,及其表达水平对患者生存的影响。结果: 20 ng/mL以上浓度的激活素 A作用24 h可显著上调pSmad2/3水平,故选择20 ng/mL的激活素 A进行后续功能实验。激活素 A处理后胃癌细胞迁移能力增强,葡萄糖摄取和乳酸产生均增加。INHBA与多个EMT相关基因及缺氧诱导因子-1α(hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, HIF1A)、葡萄糖转运蛋白3(glucose transporter 3, GLUT3)表达呈显著正相关[SNAI1: r=0.47, P=0;SNAI2: r=0.51, P=0;波形蛋白(vimentin,VIM): r=0.37, P=2.1×10-14;基质金属蛋白酶(matrix metalloproteinase,MMP)2: r=0.64, P=0;MMP9: r=0.27, P=2.8×10-8;HIF1A: r=0.45, P=0;SLC2A3: r=0.42, P=0]。激活素 A处理后,snail、slug、VIM、MMP2、GLUT3等蛋白表达升高(P<0.05)。INHBA在胃癌组织中表达明显高于癌旁胃黏膜组织,高表达INHBA的患者预后差。结论: 激活素 A可促进胃癌细胞迁移和有氧糖酵解,其机制可能是激活素 A 促进了EMT相关基因及GLUT3的表达,INHBA高表达是胃癌患者的不良预后标志。
赵丽琴, 郭伟剑, 余诺亚, 吴珺玮, 张俊 . 激活素A对胃癌细胞迁移和有氧糖酵解的影响[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2022 , 17(04) : 317 -323 . DOI: 10.16138/j.1673-6087.2022.04.009
Objective To investigate the role of activin A, a member of transforming growth factor-β superfamily cytokine, in regulating migration and aerobic glycolysis of gastric cancer cells, and the prognostic value of the expression of its coding gene inhibin βA(INHBA) in survival of gastric cancer patients. Methods The gastric cells were first titrated with various concentration of activin A and the expression of pSmad2/3 was examined by Western blot(WB) to determine the concentration range of activin A used in the study. The effect of activin A on the migration of gastric cancer cells was monitored by transwell and wound healing assays. The lactate production and glucose uptake of gastric cancer cells were followed to evaluate the role of activin A on the regulation of aerobic glycolysis. The association between activin A and epithelial mesenchymal transformation(EMT)/glycolysis related genes was analyzed in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) gastric cancer database, and further validated by WB studies. The expression of INHBA in gastric cancer and normal mucosa tissue were analyzed in TCGA, Gene Expression Omnibus(GEO) and other publicly available databases to explore the association of INHBA expression level with patients’ survival. Results The activin A at 20 ng/mL sufficiently upregulate the level of pSmad2/3, and the concentration was thus used in the study. Activin A promoted migration and aerobic glycolysis of gastric cancer cells. There was a significant positive correlation between the expression of INHBA and several EMT related genes, hypoxia inducible factor-1 α(HIF1A), glucose transporter 3 (GLUT3) [SNAI1: r=0.47, P=0;SNAI2: r=0.51, P=0; VIM: r=0.37, P=2.1×10-14; matrix metalloproteinase(MMP)2: r=0.64, P=0; MMP9: r=0.27, P=2.8×10-8; HIF1A: r=0.45, P=0; SLC2A3: r=0.42, P=0]. After treatment with activin A, the expression of snail, slug, vimentin, MMP2 and GLUT3 increased significantly(P<0.05). The expression of INHBA in gastric cancer was significantly higher than that in normal gastric mucosa tissue, and the prognosis of patients with higher expression of INHBA was poor. Conclusions Activin A can promote migration and aerobic glycolysis, which might attribute to its upregulation of EMT related genes and GLUT3. High level of INHBA is indicative of prognosis for gastric cancer patients.
Key words: Gastric cancer; Activin A; Migration; Glycolysis
[1] | Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. |
[2] | 郑荣寿, 孙可欣, 张思维, 等. 2015年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2019, 41(1): 19-28. |
[3] | Baracos VE, Martin L, Korc M, et al. Cancer-associated cachexia[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2018, 4: 17105. |
[4] | Morianos I, Papadopoulou G, Semitekolou M, et al. Activin-A in the regulation of immunity in health and disease[J]. J Autoimmun, 2019, 104: 102314. |
[5] | Ries A, Schelch K, Falch D, et al. Activin A: an emerging target for improving cancer treatment?[J]. Expert Opin Ther Targets, 2020, 24(10): 985-996. |
[6] | Thissen JP, Loumaye A. Role of activin A and myostatin in cancer cachexia[J]. Ann Endocrinol (Paris), 2013, 74(2): 79-81. |
[7] | Lee SJ, Lehar A, Meir JU, et al. Targeting myostatin/activin A protects against skeletal muscle and bone loss during spaceflight[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2020, 117(38): 23942-23951. |
[8] | Ghosh AC, O’Connor MB. Systemic activin signaling independently regulates sugar homeostasis, cellular metabolism, and pH balance in Drosophila melanogaster[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014, 111(15): 5729-5734. |
[9] | Zhao L, Zhang J, Qu X, et al. Microsatellite instability-related ACVR2A mutations partially account for decreased lymph node metastasis in MSI-H gastric cancers[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2020, 13: 3809-3821. |
[10] | Kaneda H, Arao T, Matsumoto K, et al. Activin A inhibits vascular endothelial cell growth and suppresses tumour angiogenesis in gastric cancer[J]. Br J Cancer, 2011, 105(8): 1210-1217. |
[11] | Kim YI, Lee HJ, Khang I, et al. Selective inhibition of cell growth by activin in SNU-16 cells[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2006, 12(19): 3000-3005. |
[12] | Dean M, Davis DA, Burdette JE. Activin A stimulates migration of the fallopian tube epithelium, an origin of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, through non-canonical signaling[J]. Cancer Lett, 2017, 391: 114-124. |
[13] | Jung BH, Beck SE, Cabral J, et al. Activin type 2 receptor restoration in MSI-H colon cancer suppresses growth and enhances migration with activin[J]. Gastroenterology, 2007, 132(2): 633-644. |
[14] | Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions[J]. Cancer Discov, 2022, 12(1): 31-46. |
[15] | Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5930): 1029-1033. |
[16] | Hanahan D, Coussens LM. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment[J]. Cancer Cell, 2012, 21(3): 309-322. |
[17] | Gill KS, Fernandes P, O’Donovan TR, et al. Glycolysis inhibition as a cancer treatment and its role in an anti-tumour immune response[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2016, 1866(1): 87-105. |
[18] | Huang Y, Chen ZC, Lu T, et al. HIF-1α switches the functionality of TGF-β signaling via changing the partners of smads to drive glucose metabolic reprogramming in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2021, 40(1): 398. |
[19] | Chan DA, Sutphin PD, Nguyen P, et al. Targeting GLUT1 and the Warburg effect in renal cell carcinoma by chemical synthetic lethality[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2011, 3(94): 94ra70. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |