外科理论与实践 ›› 2019, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (03): 226-229.doi: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2019.03.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

血友病A病人行ERCP治疗的安全有效性分析(附7例报告)

任家俊, 陆晔, 马迪, 王俊青, 龚笑勇, 杨宇尘, 叶枫, 陈拥军, 陈胜   

  1. 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院外科,上海 200025
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-17 发布日期:2019-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 陈胜,E-mail: 13701777536@163.com

Effectiveness and safety of ERCP in treatment of hemophilia A patients: a report of 7 cases

REN Jiajun, LU Ye, MA Di, WANG Junqing, GONG Xiaoyong, YANG Yuchen, YE Feng, CHEN Yongjun, CHEN Sheng   

  1. Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2017-05-17 Published:2019-06-25

摘要: 目的 探讨血友病A病人行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ERCP)治疗相关肝胆胰疾病的有效性和安全性。方法 回顾性分析2013年12月至2017年3月在我院外科行ERCP治疗的7例血友病A病人临床资料,其中5例轻型,2例中型。有5例为胆总管结石,其中1例伴感染,2例为胰头恶性肿瘤引起胆总管下端梗阻。对血友病病人围术期充分补充抗血友病球蛋白(anti-hemophilic globulin, AHG),严密监测相关凝血指标和生命体征。结果 2例行十二指肠乳头球囊扩张+网篮取石,2例行括约肌切开+网篮取石,2例行金属支架,1例单独行鼻胆管引流。4例胆总管结石病人予鼻胆管引流术。7例病人均顺利出院,平均住院时间为(9.6±3.2)(7~16) d。术前病人FⅧ:C为(18.7%±11.1%)(1.2%~28.2%),术前输AHG(2 743±964)(2 000~4 000) U/d。所有病人术后血红蛋白(100±30)(51~131) g/L和红细胞比容(0.293±0.084)(0.160~0.396),与术前[(105±35)(50~150) g/L和(0.307±0.097)(0.161~0.423)相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后平均血淀粉酶为(105±80)(28~237) U/L。所有病例均无围术期出血、消化道穿孔、胰腺炎等ERCP相关并发症发生。结论 在补充AHG等治疗下,对血友病A病人行ERCP治疗安全有效。

关键词: 血友病A, 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术, 抗血友病球蛋白, 凝血因子Ⅷ

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of ERCP in treatment of hemophilia A patients. Methods The data of 7 cases with hemophilia A including 5 cases mild type and 2 cases moderate type in our hospital performed ERCP from December 2013 to March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Five cases had choledocholithiasis including 1 case combined with biliary infection and other 2 cases with biliary obstruction of pancreatic head cancer. Anti-hemophilic globulin (AHG) was given perioperatively combined with accurate monitor of coagulation factor level as well as vital signs. Results There were 2 cases with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and bile duct stone removal, 2 cases with endosco-pic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal, 2 cases with endoscopic metal biliary drainage and 1 case with endosco-pic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) only. Totally, ENBD was performed for 4 cases of bile duct stone. All patients discharged with hospital stay (9.6± 3.2) (7-16) d. The preoperative FⅧ:C was (18.7%± 11.1%) (1.2%-28.2%) and AHG dose was (2 743± 964) (2 000~4 000) U/d. There was no significant difference in the postoperative hemoglobin (100± 30)(51~131) g/L and hematocrit (0.293± 0.084) (0.160-0.396) when compared with those preoperatively (105± 35) (50-150) g/L and (0.307± 0.097) (0.161-0.423). The postoperative serum amylase was (105± 80)(28-237) U/L. No any ERCP perioperative complications were found including bleeding, gastronintestinal perforation and acute pancreatitis. Conclusions ERCP could be effective and safe for patients with hemophilia A after infusion of AHG and careful monitoring and perioperative treatment.

Key words: Hemophilia A, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Anti-hemophilic globulin, Coagulation factor Ⅷ

中图分类号: