Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice ›› 2020, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (01): 50-55.doi: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2020.01.011

• Original article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique following laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy: a case report of gastrointestinal stromal tumor at the gastric cardia and literature review

YAN Chaoa,c,d, LU Shenga,c,d, HE Xiangyib, FENG Runhuaa,c,d, LI Chena,c,d, YAN Mina,c,d(), ZHU Zhengganga,c,d()   

  1. a. Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    b. Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    c. Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    d. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomach Neoplasm, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2019-12-19 Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-02-25
  • Contact: YAN Min,ZHU Zhenggang E-mail:zzg1954@hotmail.com;ym10299@163.com

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique following laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy. Methods The clinical data of one patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor at the gastric cardia who underwent laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy in September 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. We reviewed the literature about esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique following proximal gastrectomy and summarized the clinical data. Results This case was a 67-year-old male patient. The patient was diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor at the gastric cardia by both preoperative imaging and postoperative pathologic examination. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique was performed. The total operative time and anastomosis time were 280 min and 100 min, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss was 40 mL. The time to the first postoperative flatus was 3 d. The time to the liquid diet was 4 d. The duration of postoperative hospital stay was 8 d. No postoperative short-term complication was found. No reflux esophagitis was shown two months postoperatively with endoscopy. The literature review showed that the occurrence of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic stenosis, and reflux esophagitis of esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique were 0-4.2%, 0-0.7%, 4.0%-29.1%, and 0-8.3%, respectively. Conclusions Esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique following laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy was safe and effective in terms of preventing gastroesophageal reflux. It can be applied in highly selected patient with upper-third gastric tumor. High attention is still required to prevent and treat the postoperative anastomotic stenosis.

Key words: Seromuscular double-flap technique, Esophagogastrostomy, Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy, Reflux esophagitis, Gastrointestinal stromal tumor

CLC Number: