Application of advanced integrated two-stage laparoscopic simulation training course in standardized training of surgical residents

doi:10.16139/j.1007-9610.2024.03.11

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To explore the feasibility and rationality of advanced integrated two-stage laparoscopic simulation training course in standardized training of surgical residents. Methods From December 2019 to December 2021, the advanced integrated two-stage laparoscopic simulation training course was carried out among 2019—2020 surgical residents who received standardized training in our hospital. The course was divided into two stages. In the first stage, BEST (best essential surgical technology training) course, adopted Darwin^® endoscopic training system, Tianyan^® endoscopic training system, Microport^® 3D laparoscopic training system and simple simulative models were used. The second stage, BEST PLUS course, same platform as that in BEST course and in vitro animal models were used. The questionnaire survey method (before and after class questionnaire) was adopted to evaluate the curriculum setting, such as curriculum form, simulators, teaching method, time arrangement, curriculum difficulty, training effect, curriculum satisfaction and so on. Results A total of 37 surgical residents completed the two-stage course training and the questionnaire survey. The overall satisfaction rate with the curriculum setting was 100%. There were 32 residents (86.5%) thought that first stage training course could significantly improve their clinical skills, 35 residents (94.6%) thought that second stage training course could significantly improve their clinical skills, and 36 resident (97.3%) thought that the first stage curriculum could significantly help them improve performance in the second stage curriculum. Conclusions The trainees had a high degree of recognition and satisfaction for the advanced integrated two-stage laparoscopic simulation training course. The overall design of course was reasonable and feasible, and was attractive to trainees.

Key words: Standardized training for surgical residents, Laparoscopic simulation training, Advanced integrated two-stage course

CLC Number:

ZHANG Luyang, JU Ping, ZHOU Xueliang, SHAO Yanfei, WU Chao, WANG Jiayu, SUN Jing, PAN Ruijun, CAI Wei. Application of advanced integrated two-stage laparoscopic simulation training course in standardized training of surgical residents[J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(03): 249-253.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig 1

Fig 2

Tab 1

Tab 2

Tab 3

Tab 4

References 8

[1]	郑民华, 赵轩. 腔镜外科三十年扬帆启航续新篇[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2021, 24(8):653-656.
	ZHENG M H, ZHAO X. Next era of the thirty-year Chinese laparoscopic surgery: past, present, and future[J]. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 2021, 24(8):653-656.
[2]	GUMBS A A, HOGLE N J, FOWLER D L. Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2007, 204(2):308-313.
[3]	潘睿俊, 薛佩, 孙晶, 等. 基于微信平台的腹腔镜基础技能培训课程有效性分析及经验分享[J]. 中国毕业后医学教育, 2018, 2(4):258-260,278.
	PAN R J, XUE P, SUN J, et al. Effectiveness analysis and experience sharing of laparoscopic basic skills training course based on wechat platform[J]. Chin J Graduate Med Educ, 2018, 2(4):258-260,278.
[4]	李宇, 李毅, 刘晓东, 等. 腹腔镜模拟教学培训体系在临床教学中的应用研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(7):554-556.
	LI Y, LI Y, LIU X D, et al. Research on the application of laparoscopic simulation teaching and training system in clinical teaching[J]. J Laparosc Surg, 2019, 24(7):554-556.
[5]	LOVASIK B P, FAY K T, PATEL A, et al. Development of a laparoscopic surgical skills simulation curriculum: enhancing resident training through directed coaching and closed-loop feedback[J]. Surgery, 2022, 171(4):897-903.
[6]	匡洁, 史霆, 许臻晔, 等. 情景模拟课程在住院医师规范化培训中的应用探讨[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2017, 9(29):5-7.
	KUANG J, SHI T, XU Z Y, et al. Exploring the application of scenario simulation courses in standardized training of resident physicians[J]. China Contin Med Educ, 2017, 9(29):5-7.
[7]	DAWE S R, WINDSOR J A, BROEDERS J A, et al. A systematic review of surgical skills transfer after simulation-based training: laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259(2):236-248. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000245 pmid: 24100339
[8]	WILLUTH E, HARDON S F, LANG F, et al. Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model: a randomized crossover study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(2):1064-1079.

Self-evaluation before training	5	4	3	2	1	Mean value
Theoretical knowledge	3(8.1)	8(21.6)	16(43.2)	4(10.8)	6(16.2)	2.9±1.2
Laparoscopic technique	3(8.1)	3(8.1)	18(48.6)	5(13.5)	8(21.6)	2.7±1.2
Laparoscopic suture knotting technique	2(5.4)	3(8.1)	13(35.1)	6(16.2)	13(35.1)	2.3±1.2
Laparoscopic camera-holding technique	5(13.5)	12(32.4)	10(27.0)	3(8.1)	7(18.9)	3.1±1.3

Level of satisfaction	High	Medium	Low
First stage training
Theory and video explanation	35 （94.6）	2 (5.4）	0
Trainer’s guidance	34 (91.9)	3 (8.1)	0
Environment and atmosphere	35 （94.6）	2 (5.4）	0
Time of training	33 （89.2）	3 (8.1)	1 （2.7）
Degree of difficulty	34 (91.9)	3 (8.1)	0
Training equipment and molds	28 （75.7）	7 (18.9)	2 （5.4）
Second stage training
Theory and video explanation	36 （97.3）	1 （2.7）	0
Trainer’s guidance	37 (100.0)	0	0
Environment and atmosphere	36 （97.3）	1 （2.7）	0
Time of training	34 (91.9)	2 （5.4）	1 （2.7）
Degree of difficulty	29 (78.4)	7 (18.9)	1 （2.7）
Training equipment and molds	35 （94.6）	2 （5.4）	0

Stage	Significant improvement	Slight improvement	No improvement
Effect of first stage training	32（86.5）	4（10.8）	1（2.7）
Effect of second stage training	35（94.6）	2（5.4）	0
Effect of integrated two-stage training course	36（97.3）	1（2.7）	0
Recognition of training course design	37（100.0）	0	0

Course	Time（min）
First stage training （n=35）
Ring shifting among track	0.9±0.2
Rope shifting through tunnel	2.2±0.4
Bean shifting to high-low column	4.1±0.6
Second stage training
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=25)	9.8±2.7
Laparoscopic gastric perforation repair (n=32)	11.1±2.8

[1]	TANG Jianxiong, MENG Yunxiao. Evolution and progress of hernia repair techniques in the past 30 years in China [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(04): 279-284.
[2]	LI Jianwen, ZHANG Yun, YUE Fei. Abdominal wall functional reconstruction in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(04): 285-291.
[3]	CHEN Shuang, HUANG Enmin, ZHOU Taicheng. Surgical treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(04): 292-295.
[4]	JI Zhenling. Diagnosis and treatment of diseases with diaphragmatic anatomic abnormalities [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(04): 296-299.
[5]	MAO Minghuan, YANG Binze, PENG Xueqiang, LI Hangyu. Innovation in the era of big data: advancing abdominal wall mechanics research through machine learning and artificial intelligence [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(04): 300-303.
[6]	LIU Yuchen, WANG Minggang. Opportunities and challenges for high-quality development of day surgery services in hernia and abdominal wall surgery [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(04): 304-310.
[7]	HAN Haifeng, LU Jinghui. Treatment of primary abdominal wall tumors via minimally invasive surgery [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(04): 311-316.
[8]	XU Jing, ZHUANG Qiulin, DONG Ruizhao, YANG Ziang. Interpretation of the updated international guidelines for groin hernia management (2023) [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(04): 316-322.
[9]	ZHANG Yizhong, TANG Rui, WANG Tingfeng, SI Xianke, YE Lebin, LIU Nan, XIANG Shijun, WU Weidong. Lateral approach single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a report of 110 cases [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(04): 323-328.
[10]	LIU Lu, ZHU Xiaoqiang, LIU Nan, LIU Jiajie, TANG Rui. Preliminary evaluation of surgical treatment for postpartum diastasis recti [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(04): 329-335.
[11]	MA Yubo, LI Qi, ZHANG Dong, GENG Zhimin. Advances in research of pancreaticobiliary maljunction-associated gallbladder cancer [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(04): 365-369.
[12]	LI Wei, WU Sheng, TIAN Yujian, TANG Xiaoming, CAI Chuang, XU Zhiwei. Risk factors and prevention strategies for intraperitoneal hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(03): 243-248.
[13]	CAI Zhenghao, ZHENG Minhua, GU Qian, HE Lin, GONG Zhenye, HU Weiguo, HE Yonggang, ZANG Lu. A Cohort study of synchronized immersion course to improve teaching effectiveness of clinical practice of surgery for eight-year program students [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(03): 254-259.
[14]	XING Xujian, CHEN Liang, HE Wen, FEI Jian. Skin thermal injury at site of hypodermic electrodes placed for intraoperative neuromonitoring during thyroidectomy: one case report [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(03): 260-263.
[15]	LI Shule, LU Lu. Development and prospect of laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy [J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2024, 29(02): 121-125.