Original article

Esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique following laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy: a case report of gastrointestinal stromal tumor at the gastric cardia and literature review

Expand
  • a. Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    b. Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    c. Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    d. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomach Neoplasm, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

Received date: 2019-12-19

  Online published: 2020-02-25

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique following laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy. Methods The clinical data of one patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor at the gastric cardia who underwent laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy in September 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. We reviewed the literature about esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique following proximal gastrectomy and summarized the clinical data. Results This case was a 67-year-old male patient. The patient was diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor at the gastric cardia by both preoperative imaging and postoperative pathologic examination. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique was performed. The total operative time and anastomosis time were 280 min and 100 min, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss was 40 mL. The time to the first postoperative flatus was 3 d. The time to the liquid diet was 4 d. The duration of postoperative hospital stay was 8 d. No postoperative short-term complication was found. No reflux esophagitis was shown two months postoperatively with endoscopy. The literature review showed that the occurrence of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic stenosis, and reflux esophagitis of esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique were 0-4.2%, 0-0.7%, 4.0%-29.1%, and 0-8.3%, respectively. Conclusions Esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique following laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy was safe and effective in terms of preventing gastroesophageal reflux. It can be applied in highly selected patient with upper-third gastric tumor. High attention is still required to prevent and treat the postoperative anastomotic stenosis.

Cite this article

YAN Chao, LU Sheng, HE Xiangyi, FENG Runhua, LI Chen, YAN Min, ZHU Zhenggang . Esophagogastrostomy using seromuscular double-flap technique following laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy: a case report of gastrointestinal stromal tumor at the gastric cardia and literature review[J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2020 , 25(01) : 50 -55 . DOI: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2020.01.011

References

[1] Muraoka A, Kobayashi M, Kokudo Y. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with the hinged double flap method[J]. World J Surg, 2016, 40(10):2419-2424.
[2] Kuroda S, Choda Y, Otsuka S, et al. Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double-flap technique as antireflux esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy (rD-FLAP Study)[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2019, 3(1):96-103.
[3] 杨力, 徐泽宽, 徐皓, 等. 腹腔镜下近端胃切除食管胃吻合肌瓣成形术(Kamikawa吻合)初步体会[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(2):227-230.
[4] Shibasaki S, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al. Robotic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy using double flap technique following proximal gastrectomy: technical aspects and short-term outcomes[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(10):4283-4297.
[5] Nunobe S, Hayami M, Hiki N. Morphological and functional reconstruction of the esophago-gastric junction with a double-flap technique after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy[J]. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg, 2017, 2:25.
[6] Shoji Y, Nunobe S, Ida S, et al. Surgical outcomes and risk assessment for anastomotic complications after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for upper-third gastric cancer[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2019, 22(5):1036-1043.
[7] Hosoda K, Washio M, Mieno H, et al. Comparison of double-flap and OrVil techniques of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy in preventing gastroesophageal reflux: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2019, 404(1):81-91.
[8] Kuroda S, Nishizaki M, Kikuchi S, et al. Double-flap technique as an antireflux procedure in esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2016, 223(2):e7-e13.
[9] Hosoda K, Yamashita K, Moriya H, et al. Laparoscopically assisted proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy using a novel "open-door" technique LAPG with novel reconstruction[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 21(7):1174-1180.
[10] Hayami M, Hiki N, Nunobe S, et al. Clinical outcomes and evaluation of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(6):1635-1642.
[11] Ueda Y, Shiroshita H, Etoh T, et al. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer[J]. Surg Today, 2017, 47(5):538-547.
[12] Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014(ver. 4)[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2017, 20(1):1-19.
[13] Jung DH, Ahn SH, Park DJ, et al. Proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. J Gastric Cancer, 2015, 15(2):77-86.
[14] Wang S, Lin S, Wang H, et al. Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(11):e0121.
[15] Nomura E, Kayano H, Lee SW, et al. Functional evaluations comparing the double-tract method and the jejunal interposition method following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an investigation including laparoscopic total gastrectomy[J]. Surg Today, 2019, 49(1):38-48.
Outlines

/