Journal of Tissue Engineering and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2015, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 174-177.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0364.2015.03.016

• Original article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Biomechanical Analysis of Embedded Cross-stitch Suture and Its Application on Extensor Tendon Repair in Zone Ⅶ

ZHOU Shengbo,MAO Hailei,YANG Xi,XU Qiming,WANG Yue,JIANG Yongkang,WANG Bin   

  • Published:2020-07-23
  • Contact: 国家自然科学基金;上海市重中之重临床医学中心;复旦大学青年教师科研能力提升项目

Abstract: Objective To investigate the biomechanical properties of embedded cross-stitch suture and its preliminary application for extensor tendon repair in zone Ⅶ. Methods Thirty-three fresh porcine extensor tendons were randomly divided into 3 groups and repaired with cross-stitch, embedded cross-stitch or Halsted suture method respectively. The tendons were subjected to an Instron tensile testing machine to test 2-mm gap formation force, ultimate strength, stiffness and energy to failure. Embedded cross-stitch was performed for repairing extensor tendons in zone V~ of 56 fingers. Protected passive and active motion protocol was used in each case after operation. Strickland TAM classification was applied to evaluate the function postoperatively. Results Under linear tension mode, embedded cross-stitch was superior to cross-stitch and Halsted method with its 2-mm gap formation force at (49.2±5.6) N, ultimate strength at (68.3±6.3) N, Stiffness at (6.9±0.7) N/mm, and energy to failure at (0.79±0.07) J (P〈0.05). Patients were followed up for 26 months, no tendon rupture was observed in any of the repaired fingers. Strickland TAM classification showed excellent in 50 fingers, good in 4 fingers, fair in 2 fingers, and the total good rate was 96.4%. Conclusion Embedded cross-stitch suture employs strong biomechanical characters with fewer suture exposure, which can fulfill the requirements for early motion protocol. Therefore, it is suggested for extensor tendon repair.

Key words: Embedded cross-stitch suture, Biomechanics, Tendon repair

CLC Number: