Subsea Pipeline Span Analysis Based on Fatigue Life

Abstract

Abstract:

Traditionally, span analysis determines the maximum allowable free span length based on the condition that no vortex induced vibration (VIV) will happen and the assumption of strength ultimate limit state (ULS). The cost of span mitigation rises rapidly with the increase of water depth. Free span analysis based on fatigue life could remarkably increase the maximum allowable span length and cut the engineering cost. We present the free span analysis method and criteria for subsea pipeline. Based on the engineering project which is the first time to use fatigue limit for pipeline design, the free span analysis is conducted by fatigue limit state (FLS) and finite element method, and the results minimize the number of span mitigation.

Key words: subsea pipeline, free span, vortex induced vibration, fatigue limit state (FLS), span mitigation

CLC Number:

TE973.92

Xiu-feng LI, Xian-hong FENG. Subsea Pipeline Span Analysis Based on Fatigue Life[J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2015, 2(3): 196-200.

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1

Fig.1

Table 2

Fig.2

Table 3

References 8

[1]	Macara J C.Malampaya deepwater gas pipeline and flowlines: technical and engineering challenges faced in the execution of the Malampaya pipeline scope[C]. OTC, 2002:14040.
[2]	王玮,Kosor R,白勇.多跨海底管道的疲劳分析[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报,2011,32(5):560. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.2011.05.004 URL
[3]	李小超,王永学.稳定流作用下海底悬跨管线涡激振动研究[J]. 船舶力学,2012,16(7):798. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2012.07.010 URL
[4]	Det Norske Veritas.DNV-OS-F101. Submarine pipeline system[S]. 2005.
[5]	American Society of Mechanical Engineers. ASME B31.8-2012. Gas transmission and distribution piping systems[S]. 2012.
[6]	American Petroleum Institute.API RP 1111. Design, construction, operation, and maintenance of offshore hydrocarbon pipelines (limit state design)[S]. 2012.
[7]	Det Norske Veritas.DNV-RP-F105. Free spanning pipelines[S]. 2006.
[8]	Det Norske Veritas.DNV-RP-F203. Fatigue design of offshore steel structures[S]. 2006.

属性	数值
外径/mm	168.3
壁厚/mm	15.7
外防腐层厚度/mm	2.8
外防腐层密度/(kg·m^-3)	930
管道长度/m	9379
设计压力/MPa	27.0
介质密度/(kg·m^-3)	5.3
水深/m	357
剩余张力/kN	150

模态阶数	1	2	3	4	5
自振频率/Hz	0.228	0.476	0.762	1.098	1.493
单位管径位移下的应力/MPa	24.572	47.365	95.374	128.90	208.26

模态阶数	1	2	3	4	5
自振频率/Hz	0.091	0.182	0.216	0.277	0.369
单位管径位移下的应力/MPa	7.638	15.52	14.04	23.88	23.83

[1]	LUO Shi-yong, WANG De-jun, LIU Xiao-xia, HUANG Jun. Application of Flexible Pipe in Deepwater Subsea Pipeline [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2018, 5(增刊): 53-56.
[2]	WANG Chao. Small Groove SMAW Process Experiment Investigation in Deepwater Subsea Pipeline Welding [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2018, 5(增刊): 65-68.
[3]	SUN Guo-min, ZHANG Jie, Xü Zhi-hui. Damage Assessment of In-Service Subsea Pipeline [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2018, 5(6): 400-404.
[4]	YE Hai-bin. Practice of Pipe Grouting Technology for Free Span of Riser Gooseneck [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2018, 5(5): 346-351.
[5]	LIU Yu-xi, HUANG Huai-zhou, LIU Zhao. VIV Fatigue Damage Analysis for Tendons of Tension Leg Platform under In-Place Condition [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2018, 5(3): 186-190.
[6]	XING Guang-kuo, WANG Chang-tao, WANG Feng-yun, ZHANG Mei-rong, ZHANG Peng-fei. Installation Analysis of S-Lay Pipeline End Termination [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2018, 5(2): 129-132.
[7]	WANG Meng, ZHAO Dong-yan. Strength Assessment on Corroded Subsea Pipeline Based on the Code of DNV-RP-F101 [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2017, 4(5): 276-280.
[8]	HUANG Yu, BAO Jia. Development in Deepwater Pipe Laying [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2017, 4(5): 281-286.
[9]	LIU You-li, XIONG Rui, YUAN Ju-yang, HONG Sen. Application of New Field Joint Coating Process to Subsea Pipeline Laying [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2017, 4(3): 168-172.
[10]	YANG Lian-feng, ZHANG Xiao-jian. Application of Wet Recovery Technology in the Process of Subsea Pipeline Repairing [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2016, 3(4): 217-221.
[11]	WANG Peng-fei, LIN Zhen-yu. Big Free Span Correction Scheme by Cement Grouting in LW3-1 Project [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2016, 3(2): 122-128.
[12]	JIA Zhen. Development of an Auto On-Off Pouring Mold Used in Field Joint Installation of GSPU Thermal Insulation Pipe [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2016, 3(1): 52-57.
[13]	Jie ZHANG, Guo-min SUW, Hong-qi MA, Guo-yang LAN. Subsea Pipeline Appendage Finite Element Analysis and Comparison of Different Checking Criteria [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2015, 2(2): 93-98.
[14]	Jing YE, Lie-jin GUO, Sen-lin CHEN, Qing-ping LI, Nai-liang LI. Comparative Experimental Study on Severe Slugging Characteristics in Different Riser Shapes [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2015, 2(1): 18-22.
[15]	Xiu-feng LI, Xian-hong FENG, Dang ZHAO. Thermal Expansion of Deep-Sea Pipeline with Inline Manifold [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2015, 2(1): 28-31.