当代外语研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02): 31-43.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2019.02.005
徐晓东, 吴诗玉
出版日期:
2019-03-28
发布日期:
2019-04-25
作者简介:
徐晓东,博士,南京师范大学外国语学院副教授。主要研究方向为心理语言学、神经语言学。电子邮箱:412alix@gmail.com基金资助:
XU Xiaodong, WU Shiyu
Online:
2019-03-28
Published:
2019-04-25
摘要: 神经语用学研究是借助心理学尤其是认知神经科学手段探讨特定语境下话语产出或理解的神经机制问题。神经语用学研究方兴未艾,在一些传统的语用热点议题上,譬如,语用预设、格赖斯会话含义、语用推理、语篇回指等,已经获得了一些比较一致的研究发现。为了让国内学者及时掌握神经语用学的最新研究动态,本文综述了近十年来神经语用学领域的一些重要研究发现,并从中归纳出一些初步的研究结论。这些研究借助各种神经活动指标对语用学家提出的语用准则及假设的心理现实性问题进行了探究,从认知和神经机制层面增加了人们对语用现象本质的理解。
中图分类号:
徐晓东, 吴诗玉. 语用信息加工的神经机制[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(02): 31-43.
XU Xiaodong, WU Shiyu. The Neuro-mechanism of Processing Pragmatic Information[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(02): 31-43.
Arts, A.,A. Maes, L. Noordman & C.Jansen.2011.Overspecification facilitates object identification [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 43(1): 361-374. Bambini, V. 2010. Neuropragmatics: A forward [J]. Italian Journal of Linguistics (1): 1-20. Barbey, A. K., R. Colom & J. Grafman. 2014. Neural mechanisms of discourse comprehension: A human lesion study [J]. Brain 137: 277-287. Bašnáková, J., K. Weber, K. M. Petersson, J. van Berkum & P. Hagoort. 2014. Beyond the language given: The neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning[J]. Cerebral Cortex 24(10): 2572-2578. Bott, L. A. & I. A. Noveck. 2004. Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 51(3): 437-457. Breheny, R., H. J. Ferguson & N. Katsos. 2013. Investigating the time course of accessing conversational implicatures during incremental sentence interpretation [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(4): 443-467. Burkhardt, P. 2006. Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from Event-related brain potentials [J]. Brain and Language 98: 159-168. Chomsky, N. 1972. Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation [A]. In N.Chomsky (ed.). Studies in Semantics in Generative Grammar [C]. The Hague: Mouton: 69-119. Cowles, H. W., M. Walenski & R. Kluender. 2007. Linguistic and cognitive prominence in anaphor resolution: Topic, contrastive focus and pronouns [J]. Topoi 26: 3-18. Cowles, H. W. & V. S. Ferreira. 2011. The influence of topic status on written and spoken sentence production [J]. Discourse Processes 49: 1-28. Domaneschi, F., P. Canal, V. Masia, E. L. Vallauri & V. Bambini. 2018. N400 and P600 modulation in presupposition accommodation: The effect of different trigger types[J]. Journal of Neurolinguistics 45: 13-35. Engelhardt, P. E, K. G. D. Bailey & F. Ferreira. 2006. Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean maxim of quantity [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 54: 554-573. Engelhardt, P. E., S. B. Demiral & F. Ferreira. 2011. Over-specified referring expressions impair comprehension: An ERP study [J]. Brain and Cognition 77: 304-314. Feng, W., Y. Wu, C. Jan, H. Yu, X. Jiang & X. Zhou. 2017. The effects of contextual relevance on pragmatic inference during conversation: An fMRI study[J]. Brain and Language 171: 52-61. Fodor, J. A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press. Friederici, A. D. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing [J]. Trends in Cognitive Science 6:78-84. Friederici, A. D. 2011. The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function [J]. Physiological Review 91: 1357-1392. Garrod, S.C. & A. J. Sanford. 1994. Resolving sentences in a discourse context [A]. In M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.).Handbook of Psycholinguistics [C]. New York: Academic Press: 675-698. Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation [A]. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (eds.).The Logic of Grammar [C]. Encino: Dickenson. Grodner, D. J., N. M. Klein, K. M. Carbary & M. K. Tanenhaus. 2010. “Some”, and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment[J]. Cognition 116: 42-55. Hagoort, P. 2005. On Broca, brain and binding: A new framework [J]. Trends in Cognitive Science (9): 416-423. Hagoort, P., L. Hald, M. Bastiaansen & K. M. Petersson. 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension [J]. Science 304: 438-441. Hagoort, P. & S. C. Levinson. 2014. Neuropragmatics [A]. In M. S. Gazzaniga & G. R. Mangun (eds.).The Cognitive Neurosciences (5th edn)[C] Cambridge: MIT Press.667-674. Hirotani, M. & P. B. Schumacher. 2011. Context and topic marking affect distinct processes during discourse comprehension in Japanese [J]. Journal of Neurolinguistics (24): 276-292. Huang, Y. T. & J. Snedeker. 2009. Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface [J]. Cognitive Psychology 58: 376-415. Hung, Y. C. & P. B. Schumacher. 2012. Topicality matters: Position-specific demands on Chinese discourse processing [J]. Neuroscience Letters 511: 59-64. Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution [M]. New York: Oxford University Press. Jackendoff, R. 2007. A parallel architecture perspective on language processing [J]. Brain Research 1146: 2-22. Jang, G., S. A. Yoon, S. E. Lee, H. Park, J. Kim, J. H. Ko & H. J. Park. 2013. Everyday conversation requires cognitive inference: Neural bases of comprehending implicated meanings in conversations[J]. Neuroimage 81: 61-72. Jouravlev, O., L. Stearns, L. Bergen, M. Eddy, E. Gibson & E. Fedorenko. 2016. Processing temporal presuppositions: An event-related potential study[J]. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31: 1245-1256. Kaiser, E. 2011. Focusing on pronouns: Consequences of subjecthood, pronominalisation, and contrastive focus [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes (10): 1625-1666. Kuperberg, G., M. Paczynski & T. Ditman. 2011. Establishing causal coherence across sentences: An ERP study [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (23): 1230-1246. Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Matsui, T. 2000. Bridging and Relevance [M]. John Benjamins. Nieuwland, M. S., M. Otten & J. J. A. Van Berkum. 2007a. Who are you talking about? Tracking discourse-level referential processing with ERPs [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (19): 228-236. Nieuwland, M. S., K. M. Petersson & J. J. A. Van Berkum. 2007b. On sense and reference: Examining the functional neuroanatomy of referential processing [J]. Neuroimage 37: 993-1004. Nieuwland, M. S., T. Ditman & G. R. Kuperberg. 2010. On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (63): 324-346. Noveck, I. & A. Posada. 2003. Characterising the time course of an implicature [J]. Brain and Language 85: 203-210. Qiu, L., T. Y. Swaab, H. C. Chen & S. Wang. 2012. The role of gender information in pronoun resolution: Evidence from Chinese [J]. Plos ONE 7(5):e36156. Schwarz, F. 2007. Processing presupposed content [J]. Journal of Semantics: An International Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of the Semantics of Natural Language 24(4): 373-416. Tiemann, S., M. Kirsten, S. Beck, I. Hertrich & B. Rolke. 2015. Presupposition processing and accommodation: An experiment on ‘wieder’ (again) and consequences for other triggers[A]. In F. Schwarz (ed.). Experimental Perspectives on Presuppositions[C]. Switzerland:Springer.39-65. Van Berkum, J. J. A., C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort. 1999. Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (41): 147-182. Van Berkum, J. J. A., C. M. Brown, P. Hagoort & P. Zwitserlood. 2003. Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension [J]. Psychophysiology 40: 235-248. Van Berkum, J. J. A., A. W. Koornneef, M. Otten & M. S. Nieuwland. 2007. Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective [J]. Brain Research 1146: 158-171. Wu, S. & Z. Ma. 2016. Suppression and working memory in auditory comprehension of L2 narratives: Evidence from cross-modal priming[J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45: 1115-1135. Xu, X. D., M. Z. Pan, H. Y. Dai, H. Zhang & Y. Y. Lu. 2018. How referential uncertainty is modulated by conjunctions: ERP evidence from advanced Chinese-English L2 learners and English L1 speakers[J]. Second Language Research, doi:10.1177/0267658318756948. Xu, X. D., X. M. Jiang & X. L. Zhou. 2013. Processing biological gender and number information during Chinese pronoun resolution: ERP evidence for functional differentiation [J]. Brain and Cognition 81: 223-236. Xu, X. D. & X. L. Zhou. 2016a. Topic shift impairs pronoun resolution during sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials [J]. Psychophysiology 53: 129-142. Xu, X. D. & X. L. Zhou. 2016b. “Who” should be focused? The influence of focus status on pronoun resolution[J]. Psychophysiology 53: 1679-1689. Xu, X. D. 2015. The influence of information status on pronoun resolution in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from ERPs[J]. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 873. Xu, X. D, X. M. Jiang & X. L. Zhou. 2015. When a causal assumption is not satisfied by reality: Differential brain responses to concessive and causal relations during sentence comprehension [J]. Language, Cognition & Neuroscience 30(6): 704-715. Yang, C. Y., C. A. Perfetti & F. Schmalhofer. 2007. Event-related potential indicators of text integration across sentence boundaries [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33(1): 55-89. Yu, J., Y. Zhang, J. E. Boland & L. Cai. 2015. The interplay between referential processing and local syntactic/semantic processing: ERPs to written Chinese discourse [J]. Brain Research, 1597 139-158. 何自然、冉永平. 2009. 新编语用学概论[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社. 蓝纯.2009.语言学概论[M]. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社. 冉永平、莫爱屏、王寅. 2006. 认知语用学[M]. 上海:上海外语教育出版社. 魏在江. 2014. 语用预设的认知语用研究[M]. 上海:上海外语教育出版社. 徐晓东. 2014. 汉语焦点信息影响代词回指的电生理机制[J]. 心理科学进展22(6): 902-910. 徐晓东、倪传斌、陈丽娟. 2013. 话题结构和动词语义对代词回指的影响——一项基于语言产生和语言理解任务的实证研究[J]. 现代外语36(4): 331-339. 徐晓东、陈丽娟、倪传斌. 2017. 汉语话题回指如何受动词语义关系约束——来自脑电研究的证据[J].外语教学与研究49(3):323-334. |
[1] | 付昊, 周波华, 马萌晨. 可规定性能的自适应滑模制导律[J]. 空天防御, 2020, 3(3): 63-70. |
[2] | 梅轩;. 含义理论视域下的道德断言新解[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(06): 57-61+109. |
[3] | 张绍杰;. 语言研究中的思辨与实证[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(05): 1-4+34. |
[4] | 苏坤;黄莹;. 论语用预设在石黑一雄作品《别让我走》的语篇功能[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(01): 60-65+78. |
[5] | 吴炳章;. 示能性和意向归属[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(06): 17-20+77. |
[6] | 华鸿燕;. 会话含义为什么可能——意识涌现的视角[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(06): 29-31. |
[7] | 何自然;. 主持人语[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(07): 18-. |
[8] | 张绍杰;张延飞;. 默认理论与关联理论——解释“一般会话含义”的两种对立方法[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(07): 19-23+28+76. |
[9] | 胡壮麟;. 谈程雨民先生语言研究的基本轨迹——庆贺程雨民先生八五华诞[J]. 当代外语研究, 2011, 11(09): 1-4. |
[10] | 魏在江;. “孩奴”的语用预设意义及其认知理据[J]. 当代外语研究, 2011, 11(07): 13-16+60. |
[11] | 袁建军;梁道华;. 文化语用预设理论视阈下的跨文化翻译[J]. 当代外语研究, 2010, 10(08): 35-39+63. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||