Research on Teacher's Learning Based on Curriculum Resources Development for Follow-up Courses of College English

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.03.013

Abstract

Abstract: The present research, by case analysis, mainly studies the influence of curriculum resources development in the circumstances of College English Follow-up Courses on teacher's learning, the characteristics of the learning and its influence on teachers' professional development. The study shows that resources development provides motivation and direction for teacher's learning. The learning has increased teachers' multiple types of knowledge, and it has enabled the formation of teacher's professional learning community. Teacher's leaning in this process has four characteristics: (1) problem-driven; (2) practically reflective; (3) interactive in the process and multiple-knowledge increasing. The learning exerts positive influence on teachers' teaching practices as well as providing direction for teachers' academic research, and finally contributes to teachers' professional development.

CLC Number:

H319.3

ZHANG Yan. Research on Teacher's Learning Based on Curriculum Resources Development for Follow-up Courses of College English[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(03): 74-79.

References

Carter K. 1990. Teachers' knowledge and learning to teach [A]. In W. R. Houston(ed.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education [C]. New York: Macmillan.291-310.
Grossman, P. L., S. S. Wineburg & S. Woolworth. 2001. Toward a theory of teacher community [J]. Teachers College Record (6): 942-1012.
Hargreaves, A. 1996. Transforming knowledge: Blurring the boundaries between research, policy and practice [J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 18(2):105-122.
Maroko. G.M. 2013.Development of language materials for national development: A language management perspective [J]. International Journal of Education and Research (1):1-14.Meirink, J. A., P. C. Meijer, N. Verloop & T. C. M. Bergen. 2009. Understanding
teacher learning in secondary education: The relations of teacher activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education (25): 89-100.
Shulman, L.1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform [J]. Harvard Educational Review 57: 1-21.
Tomlinson, B.1998.Materials Development in Language Teaching [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, M. & R. Burden. 2000. Psychology for Language Teachers [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
陈向明.2000.质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社.
崔琳琳. 2013.外语教师学习研究述评:理论、主题与方法[J]. 中国外语(6):103-109.
郭遂红. 2014.基于教学情境的外语教师非正式学习与专业发展研究[J]. 外语界(1):88-96.
韩曙花、刘永兵.2011. 西方教师知识与教师专业发展研究述评[J]. 外国教育研究 (11):62-67.
胡庆芳. 2005.教师专业发展背景下的学习与学习文化的重建[J]. 上海教育科研 (5): 23-25.
李定仁、段兆兵.2005. 论课程资源开发与教师专业成长[J]. 教育理论与实践25(6): 42-45.
柳淑瑛.2014.基于“学生需求”的外语教师学习研究[J]. 教师教育研究 (6):69-79.
束定芳. 2006. 外语课堂教学新模式刍议[J].外语界 (4):21-29.
孙钦美、郑新民. 2015.共同体视域下高校英语教师个性化学习的个案研究[J]. 外语界(5): 88-96.
王俊菊.2012.外语课堂环境下的教师学习研究[J]. 中国外语 (1):56-63.
王艳. 2011.优秀外语教师实践性知识的个案研究[J]. 外语教学理论与实践(1): 68-76.
徐继存、段兆兵、陈琼.2002.论课程资源及其开发与利用[J].学科教育(2):1-5,26.
许悦婷、刘永灿.2008. 大学英语教师形成性评估知识的叙事探究[J]. 外语教学理论与实践(3): 61-67.
张莲、王艳.2014.通过课堂话语分析促进外语教师学习:一项实证案例研究[J]. 外语与外语教学(3):36-41.
张晓蕾.2015. 知识论视角下西方教师学习研究的变迁及趋势[J]. 四川师范大学学报(4):109-115.
张艳、许竹君. 2013.高职外语教师课程资源开发与利用现状调查[J]. 河北师范大学学报(10):80-85.
张艳、伍杏英.2012. 课程资源开发:外语教师专业发展的途径选择[J].广东技术师范学院学报(1):125-127.
朱淑华、伍思静.2012. 论大学外语教师专业学习共同体的构建[J]. 东北师大学报(3):134-137.

[1]	CHEN Xiaoxiang, JIANG Qiao, ZENG Xiaoyan. The Acquisition of English Progressive Aspect Marker by Chinese Learners [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(03): 65-73.
[2]	HUANG Xueping. The Mediating Role of Self-efficacy in the Relationship between Tolerance of Ambiguity and Foreign Language Learning Anxiety [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(04): 39-42.