中文朗读和默读下词频与笔画数的副中央凹-中央凹效应

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.01.002

当代外语研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01): 5-11.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.01.002

中文朗读和默读下词频与笔画数的副中央凹-中央凹效应

张慢慢, 张心如, 符颖, 杜红, 臧传丽

天津师范大学,天津,300074

出版日期:2017-01-28 发布日期:2020-07-25
作者简介:张慢慢,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院助理研究员。主要研究方向为中文阅读、眼动控制。电子邮箱:zhangmanman289@126.com
张心如,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院本科生。主要研究方向为应用心理学。电子邮箱:370300142@qq.com
符颖,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院硕士生。主要研究方向为基础心理学。电子邮箱:1206104828@qq.com
杜红,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院硕士生。主要研究方向为基础心理学。电子邮箱:18222735696@163.com
臧传丽,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院副教授。主要研究方向为中文阅读、眼动控制。电子邮箱:zangchuanli@163.com
基金资助:
*本文受国家自然科学基金项目“自然阅读中的词跳读:视觉和语言信息的交互作用”(编号31571122)和“汉语阅读障碍儿童行为及脑机制的多模态研究”(编号81471629)的资助。

The Parafoveal-fovel Effects of Word Frequency and Complexity during Chinese Silent and Oral Reading

ZHANG Manman, ZHANG Xinru, FU Ying, DU Hong, ZANG Chuanli

Online:2017-01-28 Published:2020-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以往研究显示,中文朗读与默读中的眼动模式存在差异。与朗读相比,从副中央凹获得的预视信息更能促进默读的进行,但两种阅读方式下副中央凹预视对中央凹的信息加工的影响是否相同,目前还不清楚。为此,本实验采用正常的句子阅读范式,操纵了副中央凹预视词的词频(高、低)与笔画数(少、多),对比了40名大学生被试在朗读与默读下对中央凹词注视的差异。结果显示,在单次注视时间上,发现了词频、笔画数与阅读方式的三阶交互作用,即在默读任务中出现了正向的词频与笔画数交互的副中央凹-中央凹效应,表现为在默读中当副中央凹词为高频、少笔画时对中央凹词的注视时间短于高频、多笔画条件,而在朗读任务中则没有发现这种效应;在凝视时间上,出现了正向的词频的副中央凹-中央凹效应,且不受阅读方式的影响,表现为副中央凹词为高频时,对中央凹词的加工时间更短。实验结果支持平行加工模型的观点。

关键词: 中文朗读, 中文默读, 副中央凹-中央凹效应

Abstract: Previous studies showed that eye movements characteristics during Chinese silent reading was different from that in Chinese oral reading. Chinese readers tended to placing more reliance on parafoveal previews in silent reading than in oral reading; however, whether it is the same or not about how parafoveal previews affecting foveal processing during the two reading modes is unclear. Thus, the present experiment compared the difference of foveal processing between silent and oral reading by recording eye movements of 40 undergraduates while reading normal sentence of which the parafoveal words varied from frequency (high, low) and stroke (less, more). The results showed that on single fixation duration, frequency and strokes of parafoveal words had different effects on foveal word processing in silent reading from that in oral reading, showing an interacted and positive parafoveal-foveal effect of word frequency and word strokes in silent reading rather than oral reading. That is, single fixation duration on foveal words was shorter when parafoveal words were high frequency and had less strokes than words of high frequency and more strokes. Meanwhile, on gaze duration, there was word frequency parafoveal-fovel effect both in silent and oral reading, with shorter gaze duration on foveal words when parafoveal words were high frequency than when those were low frequency. The results were in consistent with the issues of the parallel graded attention models of reading.

中图分类号:

H319

张慢慢, 张心如, 符颖, 杜红, 臧传丽. 中文朗读和默读下词频与笔画数的副中央凹-中央凹效应[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(01): 5-11.

ZHANG Manman, ZHANG Xinru, FU Ying, DU Hong, ZANG Chuanli. The Parafoveal-fovel Effects of Word Frequency and Complexity during Chinese Silent and Oral Reading[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(01): 5-11.

参考文献

Ashby, J., J. Yang, K. H. C. Evans & K. Rayner. 2012. Eye movements and the perceptual span in silent and oral reading [J]. Attention Perception & Psychophysics 74(4):634-640.
Cai, Q. & M. Brysbaert. 2010. SUBTLEX–CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitle [J]. PLoS ONE 5(6): e10729.
Drieghe, D., M. Brysbaert & T. Desmet. 2005. Parafoveal–on–foveal effects on eye movements in reading: Does an extra space make a difference? [J].Vision Research 45(13): 1693-1706.
Engbert, R. & R. Kliegl. 2011. Parallel graded attention models of reading [A]. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist & S. Everling (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements [C].Oxford: Oxford University Press.787-800.
Henderson, J. M. & F. Ferreira. 1990. Effects of foveal processing dificulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16(3): 417-429.
Hyönä, J. & R. Bertram. 2004. Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading?[J]. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16(1-2): 104-127.
Inhoff, A. W. & R. Radach. 2014. Parafoveal preview benefits during silent and oral reading: Testing the parafoveal information extraction hypothesis [J]. Visual Cognition 22(3): 354-376.
Kennedy, A. & J. Pynte. 2005. Parafoveal–on–foveal effects in normal reading [J]. Vision Research 45(2): 153-68.
Kennedy, A., J. Pynte & S.Ducrot. 2002. Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55(4): 1307-1337.
Liversedge, S. P., C. Zang, M. Zhang, X. Bai, G. Yan & D. Drieghe. 2014. The effect of visual complexity and word frequency on eye movements during Chinese reading [J]. Visual Cognition 22(3-4): 441-457.
Rayner, K. 2009. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62(8): 1457-1506.
Rayner, K., B. J. Juhasz & S. J. Brown. 2007. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33(1): 230-245.
Rayner, K., A. Pollatsek, J. Ashby & C. Clifton. 2012. The Psychology of Reading [M]. New York: Psychology Press.
Reichle, E. D. 2011. Serial–attention models of reading [A]. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist & S. Everling (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.767-786.
White, S. J. 2008. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34(1): 205-223.
White, S. J. & S. P. Liversedge. 2006. Foveal processing difficulty does not modulate non–foveal orthographic influences on fixation positions [J]. Vision Research 46(3): 426-437.
Yang, J., S. Wang, X. Tong & K. Rayner. 2012. Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading [J]. Reading and Writing 25(5):1031-1052.
白学军. 2016. 实验心理学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.
白学军、胡笑羽、闫国利. 2009a.非注视词特性对注视词加工作用的眼动研究[J].心理科学(2):308-311.
白学军、胡笑羽、闫国利. 2009b.中文阅读的副中央凹–中央凹效应:词n的语义透明度对词n–1加工的影响[J]. 心理学报(5):377-386.
白学军、刘娟、臧传丽、张慢慢、郭晓峰、闫国利. 2011.中文阅读过程中的副中央凹预视效应[J].心理科学进展(12):1721-1729.
白学军、田丽娟、张涛、梁菲菲、闫国利.2009.朗读条件下词切分方式对说明文阅读影响的眼动研究[J].天津工程师范学院学报(3):39-44.
毕鸿燕、翁旭初.2006.出声阅读中语音通达的双通路模型[J]. 生物物理学报(5):325-330.
崔磊、王穗苹、闫国利、白学军. 2010. 中文阅读中副中央凹与中央凹相互影响的眼动实验[J]. 心理学报(5):547-558.
高敏、徐迩嘉、任桂琴、隋雪. 2016. 出声阅读和默读之间的差异[J].心理科学进展(1):21-30.
胡笑羽、白学军、闫国利. 2010. 副中央凹–中央凹效应的研究现状及展望[J].心理科学进展(3): 412-419.
刘丽萍、刘海健、胡笑羽. 2006. SWIFT–II: 阅读中眼跳发生的动力学模型[J].心理与行为研究(3):230-235.
王穗苹、佟秀红、杨锦绵、冷英. 2009. 中文句子阅读中语义信息对眼动预视效应的影响[J].心理学报(3):220-232.
闫国利、巫金根、胡晏雯、白学军. 2010. 当前阅读的眼动研究范式述评[J].心理科学进展 18(12):1966-1976.
闫国利、熊建萍、臧传丽、余莉莉、崔磊、白学军. 2013. 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述[J]. 心理科学进展(4):589-605.
臧传丽、张慢慢、郭晓峰、刘娟、闫国利、白学军. 2012. 中文词汇加工的若干效应: 基于眼动研究的证据[J].心理科学进展(9):1-11.
臧传丽、张慢慢、岳音其、白学军、闫国利. 2013. 副中央凹信息量对中文朗读和默读的调节作用[J].心理与行为研究(4):444-450.

[1]	徐斌. 高校外语课程思政中的国家意识培育[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 35-41.
[2]	苗兴伟. 新文科背景下师范类院校外语专业人才培养体系建设[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 72-81.
[3]	屈文生. 新文科理念下的新时代高等外语教育意象——以“大外语”等命题为中心[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 82-91.
[4]	常辉. 新文科背景下上海交通大学英语专业改革与人才培养探索[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 92-96.
[5]	纪秀明, 曾春葙. 新文科视域下外语学科改革的几个平衡点与适度性问题[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 97-102.
[6]	郭鸿杰, 张达球, 丁冬. 一体三通,融创合一:新文科背景下财经类高校外语人才培养模式创新[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 35-44.
[7]	潘海英, 刘淑玲. 新文科建设背景下大学外语课程创新发展的若干思考[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 45-52.
[8]	马炳军, 常辉. 汉语二语句法加工研究:理论与实验[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 61-70.
[9]	陶继芬. POA“读说”模式英语口语课堂教学设计[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 96-103.
[10]	李建波, 张格堃. 文化观念和文学典籍交相辉映——《文化观念流变中的英国文学典籍研究》评述[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 106-110.
[11]	田秘, 赵永峰. 概念整合理论的批评认知语言学阐释——以“the *ly challenged”委婉构式为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 84-95.
[12]	杨港, 彭楠. 数字时代高校外语教材研究的自传式叙事范式[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 96-105.
[13]	魏育青. 关于“小语种”T字型人才培养的再思考[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 451(1): 61-63.
[14]	郑咏滟. 后疫情时代的多语研究:反思与展望[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 451(1): 64-74.
[15]	黄立鹤. 多模态范式与后疫情时代的外语教学[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 451(1): 75-85.

中文朗读和默读下词频与笔画数的副中央凹-中央凹效应

The Parafoveal-fovel Effects of Word Frequency and Complexity during Chinese Silent and Oral Reading

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价