当代外语研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 61-70.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2021.03.007
出版日期:
2021-06-28
发布日期:
2021-09-30
作者简介:
马炳军,阜阳师范大学外国语学院副教授。主要研究方向为二语习得、外语教学。电子邮箱: 基金资助:
Online:
2021-06-28
Published:
2021-09-30
摘要:
首先,简要回顾了二语研究和汉语二语研究的发展历程,指出从二语习得研究到二语加工研究的必要性和必然性。其次,重点梳理了目前的汉语二语句法加工研究,包括汉语二语句子加工策略、“把”字句、“被”字句、关系从句和话题句等,以及这些研究对“统一竞争模型”和“浅层结构假说”的验证;对现有研究在研究内容、研究方法和理论等方面进行了深入剖析,并指出存在的问题。最后,指出未来汉语二语句法加工领域需要开展的一些研究工作,以及汉语二语句法加工研究的使命。
中图分类号:
马炳军, 常辉. 汉语二语句法加工研究:理论与实验[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(3): 61-70.
MA Bingjun, CHANG Hui. Research on L2 Chinese Syntactic Processing: Theories and Empirical Studies[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 21(3): 61-70.
[1] | Bates, E., & B. MacWhinney. 1981. Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: Pragmatic, semantic and perceptual strategies[A].In H. Winitz (ed.). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on Native and Foreign Language Acquisition[C]. New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences. 190-214. |
[2] | Bates E., & B. MacWhinney 1982. Functionalist approaches to grammar[A].In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (eds.). Language Acquisition: The State of the Art [C]. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 173-218. |
[3] | Bates E., & B. MacWhinney. 1989. Functionalism and the competition model[A].In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (eds.). The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing [C]. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 3-76. |
[4] | Chen L., H. Shu, Y. Liu, J. Zhao, & P. Li. 2007. ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning[J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition (10):161-174. |
[5] | Chen S. H, S. H. Tseng, & S. C. Chen. 2012. The development of L2 given/new interpretation by L2 learners of Chinese: Based on the Competition Model[J]. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching (9):1-31. |
[6] |
Clahsen, H., & C. Felser. 2006. Grammatical processing in language learners[J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 27:3-42.
doi: 10.1017/S0142716406060024 URL |
[7] |
Clahsen, H., & C. Felser. 2017. Some notes on the shallow structure hypojournal[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:693-706.
doi: 10.1017/S0272263117000250 URL |
[8] | Corder S. P. 1967. The significance of learners’ errors[J]. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (5):161-170. |
[9] | Cui Y. Q. 2013. L2 processing of relative clauses in Mandarin[J]. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching 20:20-39. |
[10] |
Ferreira F. 2003. The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences[J]. Cognitive Psychology 47:164-203.
doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7 URL |
[11] | Keenan, E., & B. Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar[J]. Linguistic Inquiry 8:63-99. |
[12] | Hernandez A., P. Li, & B. MacWhinney. 2005. The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences (9):220-225. |
[13] | Hsu D. B. 2017. Second language learners’ use of good-enough representation in grammatical processing[J]. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 15:77-116. |
[14] | Li, Q, X., Y, Guo, Y. R. Yao, & N. Müller . 2016. Relative clause preference in learners of Chinese as a second language[J]. Journal of Applied Linguistics 39:199-214. |
[15] |
Liu, H, E. Bates,& P. Li . 1992. Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Chinese[J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 13:451-484.
doi: 10.1017/S0142716400005762 URL |
[16] | MacWhinney, B. 1989. Competition and connectionism[A]. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (eds.). The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing [C]. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 442-457. |
[17] | MacWhinney B. 2008. A unified model[A].In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (eds.). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition[C]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 341-372. |
[18] | MacWhinney B. 2012. The logic of the Unified Model>[A].In S. Gass & A. Mackey (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition[C]. New York, NY: Routledge. 211-227. |
[19] | Packard J. L. 2008. Relative clause processing in L2 speakers of Mandarin and English[J]. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 43:107-146. |
[20] |
Perani, D., & J. Abutalebi. 2005. The neural basis of first and second language processing[J]. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15:202-206.
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.007 URL |
[21] |
Pinker S. 1991. Rules of language[J]. Science 253:530-535.
pmid: 1857983 |
[22] |
Pinker S. 1998. Words and Rules[J]. Lingua 106:219-242.
doi: 10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00035-7 URL |
[23] | Pinker S. 1999. Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language[M]. New York: Basic Books. |
[24] | Pinker, S., & M. Ullman. 2002. The past and future of the past tense[J]. Trends in Cognitive Science (6):456-463. |
[25] | Sabourin, L., & M. Haverkort. 2003. Neural substrates of representation and processing of a second language[A].In R. Van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken & R. Towell (eds.). The Lexicon-syntax Interface in Second Language Acquisition[C]. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 175-195. |
[26] | Selinker L. 1972. Interlanguage[J]. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10:209-230. |
[27] | Song K Y, & H. Chang. (to appear) Processing of Mandarin Chinese base-generated-topic sentences by L1-Korean learners of Chinese: Evidence from an Eye-tracking study[J]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics. |
[28] |
Su, I. Ru. 2001. Transfer of sentence processing strategies: A comparison of L2 learners of Chinese and English[J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 22:83-112.
doi: 10.1017/S0142716401001059 URL |
[29] | Sung Y. T., J. Y. Tu, J. H. Cha, & M. D. Wu. 2016. Processing preference toward object-extracted relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese by L1 and L2 speakers: An eye-tracking study[J]. Frontiers in Psychology (7):1-14. |
[30] |
Xu Y. 2014. Processing relative clauses in Chinese as a second language[J]. Second Language Research 30:439-461.
doi: 10.1177/0267658313511485 URL |
[31] |
Ullman M. T. 2001. The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar[J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30:37-69.
pmid: 11291183 |
[32] |
Ullman M. T. 2004. Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model[J]. Cognition 92:231-270.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 URL |
[33] | Ullman M. T. 2005. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model[A].In C. Sanz (ed.). Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory and Practice[C]. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 141-178. |
[34] | Ullman M. T. 2006. The declarative/procedural model and the shallow structure hypojournal[J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 27:97-105. |
[35] | Wang, J., & C. X. Xu. 2015. Cue competition between animacy and word order: Acquisition of Chinese notional passives by L2 learners[J]. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics (5):213-224. |
[36] |
Weber, A., & A. Cutler. 2003. Lexical competition in non-native spoken word recognition[J]. Journal of Memory and Language 50:1-25.
doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00105-0 URL |
[37] | Xu Y. 2009. The Syntax, Processing and Second Language Acquisition of Chinese Relative Clauses[D]. Tucson: University of Arizona. |
[38] | Yuan B. 2017. Can L2 sentence processing strategies be native-like? Evidence from English speakers’ L2 processing of Chinese base-generated-topic sentences[J]. Lingua 191-192:42-64. |
[39] | 曹贤文, 牟蕾. 2013. 汉语二语处理中句法启动效应的实验研究[J]. 汉语学习 (4):80-86. |
[40] | 常辉, 陈永捷. 2006. 普遍语法可及性新说[J]. 当代语言学 (3):244-257. |
[41] | 常辉. 2009. 冠词习得与中介语句法损伤研究[J]. 外国语 (6):35-46. |
[42] | 常辉. 2014. 接口假说与接口知识习得研究[J]. 外语与外语教学 (6):44-50. |
[43] | 李凌, 高立群. 2012. 句法、语义和语用对汉语句子认知加工的影响[J]. 语言教学与研究 (1):7-14. |
[44] | 吕必松. 1993. 对外汉语教学研究[M]. 北京: 北京语言学院出版社. |
[45] | 吕骏, 吴芙芸. 2017. 试论指量词在汉语关系从句中不对称分布的可习得性——来自二语语料库及产出实验的证据[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报 (4):62-70. |
[46] | 施家炜. 2006. 国内汉语第二语言习得研究二十年[J]. 语言教学与研究 (1):15-26. |
[47] | 宋扬. 2014. 汉语作为第二语言习得研究述评[J]. 云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版) (2):51-60. |
[48] | 徐子亮. 2004. 对外汉语学习理论研究二十年[J]. 世界汉语教学 (4):63-73. |
[49] | 杨洋. 2012. 汉语本族语者和德语本族语者加工汉语被字句的认知神经模式对比——一项ERP研究[D]. 上海: 上海外国语大学. |
[50] | 查芸芸, 吴思娜. 2014. 汉语句法启动效应实验研究[J]. 语言教学与研究 (1):13-19. |
[1] | 翁静乐, 翁凤翔. 商务英语发展热点问题评述[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(6): 106-114. |
[2] | 李睿. 德语口语句首前置的形式和功能——兼谈现代汉语作为口语导向型语言的可能性[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(6): 115-125. |
[3] | 王克非. 外语教师之困局与新局[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(6): 5-11. |
[4] | 高彦梅, 周江平. 语义密度、句法复杂度与学科知识编码[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(6): 55-67. |
[5] | 战双鹃. 大学英语课程思政发展:可为、应为与何为[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(6): 68-75. |
[6] | 李艳, 李涛. 英语写作教学中同伴互评思辨效应研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(6): 76-85. |
[7] | 臧庆, 徐海铭, 管晶晶. 读写双链二语写作教学模式:理据与实践[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(6): 86-94. |
[8] | 卓丽, 尤泽顺. 中方贸易白皮书之国家道义立场构建[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(6): 95-105. |
[9] | 王杨钰. 英语通用语意识在课堂教学中的实证研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(5): 146-154. |
[10] | 周卫京, 王苏婉. 我国基于语料库的英语口语教学研究20年综述 (2002~2021)[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 460(4): 123-132. |
[11] | 邹绍艳, 范劲松. 评分员视角下外语写作测试分项评分标准的界定[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 460(4): 133-143. |
[12] | 杨伊, 陈昌来. 多模态话语分析:教师话语研究的一种新范式[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 460(4): 144-153. |
[13] | 陈朗, 孙忠广. 口译能力研究多元构拟[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 460(4): 58-69. |
[14] | 钟丽佳, 郭聪. 促进交替传译中有效心理加工的实证研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 460(4): 87-97. |
[15] | 盖飞虹. 语言迁移研究30年变迁[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(3): 113-121. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||