德语口语句首前置的形式和功能——兼谈现代汉语作为口语导向型语言的可能性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.06.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

句首前置主要指直接或间接位于前场之前的结构。以左移位和自由主题为代表的句首前置结构主要出现在德语口语中,具有重要的语用功能。本文的研究目的是探讨德语口语中句首前置结构的主要形式和功能,并联系作为“话题优先型语言”的汉语的话题结构,进一步探讨现代汉语作为“口语导向型语言”的可能性。本文首先对前前场、左外场等概念进行梳理,并对左移位和自由主题进行区分,在概述话题标记的形式手段之后,分析德语口语句首前置结构的主要功能,最后联系汉语的情况进行讨论。左移位和自由主题是句子外部话题实现的两种主要类型,这种话题标记结构属于德语口语的特征。现代汉语是一种句法化程度较低的语言,其口语性特征使其更多地呈现出一种语用模式,汉语之所以展现出更强的话题优先性,正与此相关,这可与话题标记结构属于德语口语特征相互印证。

关键词: 左移位, 自由主题, 话题优先, 框架

Abstract:

The pre-front field position, represented by left dislocation and hanging topic, is mainly found in spoken German and has important pragmatic functions. The aim of this paper is to investigate the main forms and functions of the pre-front field structures in spoken German, and to further explore the possibility of modern Chinese as a speech-oriented language in relation to the topic structure of Chinese as a topic-prominent language. In this paper, we first sort out the concepts of pre-prefield and left external field and distinguish between left dislocation and hanging topic. After an overview of the formal means of topic marking, we analyze the main functions of the pre-front field structures in spoken German, and finally discuss them in relation to the information structure of modern Chinese. Left dislocation and hanging topic are two main types of topic realization outside the sentence.Topic marking structures belong to the features of spoken German.Modern Chinese is a less grammaticalized language, and its colloquial characters make it more of a pragmatic mode. The reason why Chinese features topic-prominent characters is related to this, which can be confirmed by the fact that the topic marking structures belongs to the features of spoken German.

Key words: left dislocation, hanging topic, topic-prominent, frame

中图分类号:

H319

李睿. 德语口语句首前置的形式和功能——兼谈现代汉语作为口语导向型语言的可能性[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(6): 115-125.

LI Rui. Forms and Functions of the Pre-Front Field Position in Spoken German: On the Possibility of Modern Chinese as a Speech-Oriented Language[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 115-125.

参考文献 36

[1]	Altmann H. 1981. Formen der “Herausstellung” im Deutschen. Rechtsversetzung, Linksversetzung, Freies Thema und verwandte Konstruktionen[M]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
[2]	Auer P. 1991. Vom Ende deutscher Sätze[J]. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 19: 139-157.
[3]	Auer P. 1996. The pre-front field position in spoken German and its relevance as a grammaticalization position[J]. Pragmatics 6(3): 295-322.
[4]	Auer P. 1997. Formen und Funktionen der vor-vorfeldbesetzung im gesprochenen Deutsch[A]. In P.Schlobinski (ed.). Syntax des gesprochenen Deutsch[C]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 55-91.
[5]	Chafe W. L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, Definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view[A]. In CharlesN. Li (ed.). Subject and Topic[C]. New York: Academic Press. 25-55.
[6]	Eisenberg P. 2006. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik[M]. Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler.
[7]	Erdmann P. 1993. Subjekt-und topikprominenz im Deutschen, Englischen und koreanischen[A]. In M.Bonner, E.Braun & H.Fix (eds.). Nachbarschaften. Festschrift für Max Mangold[C]. Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker Druckerei und Verlag. 319-336.
[8]	Fiehler R., B. Barden M. Elstermann & B. Kraft. 2004. Eigenschaften Gesprochener Sprache[M]. Tübingen: Narr.
[9]	Givón T. 1979. Syntacticization[A]. In T.Givón.(ed.) On Understanding Grammar. Perspectives in Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistics[C]. Orlando/London: Academic Press. 207-233.
[10]	Grosu A. 1975. On the status of positionally-defined constraints in syntax[J]. Theoretical Linguistics 2: 159-201.
[11]	Hetland J. & V. Molnár. 2001. Informationsstruktur und reliefgebung[A]. In M.Haspelmath, E.König, W. Oesterreicher&W. raible (eds.). Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien. Ein internationales Handbuch[C]. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. 617-633.
[12]	Konerding K.P. 2003. probleme mit topik und Fokus im Deutschen[J]. Deutsche Sprache 31: 209-237.
[13]	Lambrecht K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14]	LaPolla R. 1990. Grammatical Relations in Chinese: Synchronic and Diachronic Considerations[M]. Berkeley: University of California.
[15]	LaPolla R. 1993. Arguments against “subject” and “direct object” as viable concepts in Chinese[J]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica 63:759-812.
[16]	Li C. N. & S. A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic. A new typology of language[A]. In C. N.Li (ed.). Subject and Topic[C]. New York: Academic Press. 457-489.
[17]	Li C. N. & S. A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[18]	Mair V. H. 1994. Buddhism and the Rise of the Written Vernacular in East Asia: The Making of National Languages[J]. The Journal of Asian Studies 53(3): 707-751. doi: 10.2307/2059728 URL
[19]	Primus B. 1993. Word Order and Information Structure: A Performance-based account of topic positions and focus positions[A]. In J. Jacobs et al.(ed.). Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung[C]. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. 880-896.
[20]	Scheutz H. 1997. Satzinitiale Voranstellungen im gesprochenen Deutsch als mittel der themensteuerung und referenzkonstitution[A]. In P.Schlobinski (ed.). Syntax der Gesprochenen Sprache[C]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 27-54.
[21]	Schlobinski P. 1992. Funktionale Grammatik und Sprachbeschreibung: Eine Untersuchung Zum Gesprochenen Deutsch Sowie Zum Chinesischen[M]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
[22]	Selting M. 1993. Voranstellungen vor den Satz. zur grammatischen form und interaktiven funktion von linksversetzung und freiem thema im Deutschen[J]. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 21: 277-290.
[23]	Tsao, Feng-fu(曹逢甫). 1979. A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese. The First Step Towards Discourse Analysis[M]. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.
[24]	Zifonun G., L Hoffmann & B. Strecker. et al. 1997. Grammatik der Deutschen Sprache[M]. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
[25]	曹逢甫. 1995. 主题在汉语中的功能研究——迈向语段分析的第一步[M]. 北京: 语文出版社.
[26]	曹逢甫. 2005. 汉语的句子与子句结构[M]. 北京: 北京语言大学出版社.
[27]	陈平. 2018. 论现代汉语语法研究中的证据问题[J]. 当代修辞学(5):1-12.
[28]	高明乐、潘晓颖. 2020. 主语的语法性质和语言类型学意义[J]. 外语教学(2):39-43.
[29]	胡旭辉. 2009. 汉语话题结构制约的认知语义与语用分析[J]. 外国语 32(3):60-68.
[30]	蒋绍愚. 2019. 汉语史的研究和汉语史的语料[J]. 语文研究(3):1-14.
[31]	刘丹青. 2016. 汉语中的非话题主语[J]. 中国语文(3):259-275,382.
[32]	刘丹青. 2022. 语言类型学与国际中文教育[J]. 语言文字应用(1):31-43.
[33]	罗天华. 2022. 作格语言的主语和汉语的主语[J]. 外语教学 43(2):23-28.
[34]	沈家煊. 2019. 谈谈功能语言学各流派的融合[J]. 外语教学与研究 51(4): 483-495, 639.
[35]	邢公畹. 1994. 现代汉语教程[M]. 天津: 南开大学出版社.
[36]	徐烈炯、刘丹青. 2007. 话题的结构与功能[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社.