“颜值”作为语言现象的生成路径、意义延展与体认理据

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.05.006

当代外语研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 49-57.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.05.006

“颜值”作为语言现象的生成路径、意义延展与体认理据

林克勤()

四川外国语大学,重庆,400031

出版日期:2022-10-28 发布日期:2022-11-11
作者简介:林克勤,博士,四川外国语大学国际传播学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为体认语言学、文化话语。电子邮箱:collin1233@163.com
基金资助:
国家社科基金西部项目“马克思主义新闻观的当代阐释与对外传播”(编号19XXW001)

“Face Score”: Its Route of Birth, Meaning of Development and Argument of Embodiment-Cognition from the Perspective of Linguistic Phenomenon

LIN Keqin()

Online:2022-10-28 Published:2022-11-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

流行新词“颜值”的诞生受到视觉文化广泛传播的影响,在崇尚视觉美学的信息时代,“颜值”一词的拟构应运而生,形成了一场先有价值内容后有语言表征的造词运动。体认语言学的视阈下,新词汇的产生是人作为主体对客观世界进行应时映射的结果,其核心原则表现为“现实—认知—语言”。语言的体认观强调人的身体体验在语言形成中的重要作用,这种体验互动中创设的模因复合体根植于语言的模槽和模标,批量生产出了“颜值”等一大批新词汇。尽管语言本身具有模糊性和多义性,但人脑的认知加工机制在不同的言说主体立场上,推动其语义在人的意识进场后从原来单指容貌向着多义性、象似性、含混性、包容性的方向延展。

关键词: 颜值, 身体体验, 语言模因, 认知加工

Abstract:

The birth of the neologism “Face Score” was influenced by the wide spread of visual culture. In the times of advocating Visual Aesthetics, the expression “Face Score” was produced through a movement of creating words based on the frame of value applied before linguistic surface features. From the perspective of ECL, the birth of new words is the outcome of mapping the objective world by human beings as subjectivity, which magnify ECL’s core principle of “reality-cognition-language”. The linguistic idea of embodiment-cognition emphasizes the important role of embodiment in the process of language emerging. Those meme complexes appearing from the embodied reactions manufactured many new words such as “Face Score” based on the cavity and module affix of language. Though language has fuzziness and ambiguity from its birth, the system of cognitive processing in the brain reconstructs and extends a trend of fuzziness, ambiguity, iconicity and inclusiveness from its original meaning.

Key words: face score, embodiment, language meme, cognitive processing

中图分类号:

林克勤. “颜值”作为语言现象的生成路径、意义延展与体认理据[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(5): 49-57.

LIN Keqin. “Face Score”: Its Route of Birth, Meaning of Development and Argument of Embodiment-Cognition from the Perspective of Linguistic Phenomenon[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 49-57.

参考文献 19

[1]	Adorno, T. W. 1981. In search of Wagner(trans. by R. Livingstone)[M]. London: Verso Press.
[2]	Berger, J. 1973. Ways of Seeing[M]. London: Penguin.
[3]	Blackmore, S. 1999. The Meme Machine[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[4]	Dawkins, R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection[M]. Oxford: Freeman.
[5]	Lachman, R., J. L. Lachman & E. C. Butterfield. 1979. Cognitive Psychology and Information Processing: An Introduction[M]. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[6]	Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[7]	Merleau-Ponty, M. M. 1974. The Phenomenology of Perception (trans. by C. Smith)[M]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[8]	Newell, A. & H. A. Simon. Human Problem Solving[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
[9]	陈文敏、林克勤. 2021. “视界是屏的”:技术化观视的演进理路与视知觉体认[J]. 编辑之友(4):67-74.
[10]	李宇明. 2002. 语法研究录[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆.
[11]	马克思、恩格斯. 1960. 马克思恩格斯全集(第3卷)[M]. 北京: 人民出版社.
[12]	乔纳森·克拉里. 2017. 观察者的技术(蔡佩君译)[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
[13]	沈家煊. 2001. 语言的“主观性”和“主观化”[J]. 外语教学与研究(4):268-275,320.
[14]	王德春. 2006. 语言学通论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[15]	王寅. 2020. 体认语言学:认知语言学的本土化研究[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆.
[16]	杨江、赵晗冰. 2020. 英汉多义词模体的计量特征[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版) 23(1):152-159.
[17]	杨朝军. 2008. 生态语言学理论概述——兼论《语言:生态学视域》[J]. 外语教育 8(00):17-23.
[18]	张先亮、李妙文. 2016. 从语言生态看新词语的产生和流行——以“颜值”为例[J]. 浙江社会科学(7):124- 130,159-160.
[19]	朱雯. 2005. “读图时代”与传播[EB/OL]. [2021-8-30]. http://www.zijin.net.

“颜值”作为语言现象的生成路径、意义延展与体认理据

“Face Score”: Its Route of Birth, Meaning of Development and Argument of Embodiment-Cognition from the Perspective of Linguistic Phenomenon

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 19

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	方颖. “花园路径”叙事效应的读者反应——以阿瑟·米勒的剧本为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(06): 112-118.
[2]	李冬梅. FOXP2基因与语言的相关性研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(11): 47-51.
[3]	夏宁满;. 语言模因方法在外语写作过程中的使用情况探究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(04): 36-41.