On the Relationship between College English Teachers' Information Literacy and Teaching Effectiveness in the Information Age

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2016.04.004

Abstract

Abstract: The rapid development of information and communication technology has posed great challenges and set new requirements to teachers' information literacy. The article has examined the relationship between college English teachers' information literacy and their teaching effectiveness by using SPSS to analyze data collected by a questionnaire, classroom observation, and an interview, which reveals that teachers' information literacy, especially their ability in integrating information technology into their teaching activities, plays a crucial role in their teaching effectiveness, and students' acquisition of explicit language knowledge. Therefore, the improvement of English teachers' information literacy calls for the efforts from teachers, higher education institutions, and the national educational policy makers as well.

CLC Number:

H319

LI Xiaoxiang, CHEN Xi. On the Relationship between College English Teachers' Information Literacy and Teaching Effectiveness in the Information Age[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2016, 16(04): 39-44.

References

Bialystok, E. 1994. Representation and ways of knowing: Three issues in second language acquisition [A]. In N. Ellis (eds). Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages [C]. London: Academic Press. 549-569.
Ellis, R. 2005. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language:A psychometric study [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27(2): 141-172.
Ellis, R. 2006. Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge [J]. Applied Linguistics 28(3): 431-463.
Ellis, R., S. Loewen & R. Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(2): 339-368.
Green, P. S. & K. Hecht. 1992. Implicit and explicit grammar: An empirical study [J]. Applied Linguistics 13(2): 168-184.
The Fair Go Project. 2006. School is for me: Pathways to student engagement [R]. Sydney: NSW Dept. of Education and Training.
Tuckman, B. W. 1995. Assessing effective teaching [J]. Peabody Journal of Education 70(2): 127-138.
UNESCO, I. C. T. 2008. Competency standards for teachers: Implementation guidelines, Version 1.0 [R]. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Warschauer, M. & D. Healey. 1998. Computers and language learning: An overview [J]. Language Teaching 31(2): 57-71.
Warschauer, M, H. Shetze & C.Meloni. 2000. Internet for English Teaching [M]. Alexandria: TESOL Publications.
Zurkowski, P. G. 1974. The Information Service Environment Relationships and Priorities. Related Paper No. 5 [R]. Washington D.C.: National Commission on Libraries and Information Sciences.
陈坚林、王静. 2016. 外语教育信息化进程中的常态变化与发展——基于教育信息化的可视化研究[J]. 外语电化教学(2): 3-9.
陈坚林. 2010. 计算机网络与外语课程的整合[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
陈颖、龚方红. 2010. 从教师信息素养的视角研究信息技术与外语课程整合的有效性[J]. 实验技术与管理27(12): 183-186.
戴曼纯. 2005. 二语习得的 “显性” 与 “隐性” 问题探讨[J]. 外国语言文学22(2): 101-111.
高海英、戴曼纯. 2004. 中国学生英语关系从句外置结构的习得——显性教学与隐性教学实证研究[J]. 外语教学与研究: 外国语文双月刊36(6): 444-450.
顾琦一. 2005. 隐性知识, 显性知识及其接口之争[J]. 外语教学26(6): 45-50.
李航. 2008. 有效教学研究及其对外语教学的启示[J]. 外语界(1): 33-39.
任杨、何高大. 2014. 教育信息技术下大学英语教学有效性研究的思考[J]. 现代远距离教育(3): 49-54.
邵红万、陈新仁. 2012. 信息技术与外语课程: 从辅助到常态化的学科性融合[J]. 外语电化教学(6): 34-41.
束定芳. 2010. 大学英语课堂教学,我们教什么,怎么教?——写在首届“外教社杯”全国大学英语教学大赛闭幕之际[J]. 外语界(6): 26-32.
苏建红. 2011. 学习者思维方式个体差异对英语语言技能的影响——以显性/隐性知识为中介[J]. 外语教学与研究:外国语文双月刊43(1): 118-129.
苏建红. 2012. 二语习得中显性知识与隐性知识关系的实证研究[J]. 外语与外语教学(1): 26-30.
王林海、张晴、马兰. 2014. 教育生态学视域下的现代信息技术与大学英语课程整合状况分析[J]. 外语电化教学(6): 46-51.
严晓蓉、何高大. 2015. 视觉学习视角下的语言可视化表征与教学应用[J]. 远程教育杂志33(2): 46-54.
阳志清、张帆. 2009. 外语教学绩效研究的系统观[J]. 中国外语6(1): 61-64.
曾永红. 2009. 英语专业学生隐性语法知识应用实证研究[J]. 外语教学与研究(4): 298-302.
张凤娟、曲鑫. 2013. 电子语言素养——信息技术与外语课程整合的生长点[J]. 情报科学31(2): 110-114.
张跃国、张渝江. 2012. 透视“翻转课堂”[J]. 中小学信息技术教育(3): 8-10.
周淑卿. 2015. 信息科技下的教学型态与有效性评价[J]. 全球教育展望(2): 122-128.
周小勇. 2010. 信息技术支撑的外语教学——逻辑框架构建[J]. 外语电化教学(4): 32-36.
朱宏洁、朱赟. 2013. 翻转课堂及其有效实施策略刍议[J]. 电化教育研究(8): 79-83.
祝智庭、刘名卓. 2014. “后MOOC”时期的在线学习新样式[J]. 开放教育研究20(3): 36-43.

[1]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 35-41.
[2]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 72-81.
[3]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 82-91.
[4]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 92-96.
[5]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 97-102.
[6]	XU Ying, BI Yu, ZHANG Yaqing. A Review of Vocabulary and English for Specific Purposes Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 104-108.
[7]	GUO Hongjie, ZHANG Daqiu, DING Dong. An Integrated and Innovative Talents-fostering Model with Practices for FLL Discipline at Chinese Financial Universities in the New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 35-44.
[8]	PAN Haiying, LIU Shuling. Innovation and Development of College Foreign Languages Teaching in the Construction of New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 45-52.
[9]	MA Bingjun, CHANG Hui. Research on L2 Chinese Syntactic Processing: Theories and Empirical Studies [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 61-70.
[10]	TAO Jifen. POA-based Reading and Speaking Approach to Oral English Teaching [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 96-103.
[11]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 106-110.
[12]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 84-95.
[13]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 96-105.
[14]	Lihe HUANG. Foreign Language Teaching and Research in the Post- pandemic Era: A Multimodal Paradigm [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 75-85.
[15]	Yongyan ZHENG. Multilingual Research in a Post-COVID Era: Reflection and Prospection [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 64-74.