Exploring the Moderated Mediation Mechanism Between Teacher Support and Perseverance in Foreign Language Learning

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2024.05.014

Abstract

Abstract:

This study is set against the backdrop of online English learning and aims to explore the relationship between the English teacher support perceived by students and the development of their perseverance in English learning. The researchers proposed a Moderated Mediation Model to investigate the mediating role of gender roles and the moderating role of gender. The research participants were 818 students from a high school in northern China who participated in online English learning, including 495 boys and 323 girls. The results of the Mediation Model first indicate that gender roles (masculine and feminine) play a partial mediating role between the English teacher support perceived by students and the perseverance in English learning. The results of the Moderated Mediation Model further show that gender only plays a moderating role in the path from “teacher support” to “feminine gender role”. Among them, the positive relationship between English teacher support and feminine gender role is stronger in boys. The research results clarify that in the process of online learning, positive interaction with English teachers is conducive to the development of students’ androgynous characteristics - that is, the joint development of masculine and feminine related traits, which is beneficial to the development of students’ perseverance in English learning; the influence of this kind of encouragement and support from teachers on the development of feminine traits in boys is more significant than that in girls. For relevant research significance, please refer to the discussion section.

Key words: English teacher support, gender role, perseverance, gender, online foreign language (English) learning

CLC Number:

H315.9

QI Yan. Exploring the Moderated Mediation Mechanism Between Teacher Support and Perseverance in Foreign Language Learning[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(5): 150-162.

Figures/Tables 5

因变量	预测变量	模型4			模型59
因变量	预测变量	B	SE	t	B	SE	t
男性化	常数	3.64	0.18	20.53^***	0.00	0.03	0.06
	TS	0.34	0.05	7.20^***	0.34	0.05	7.20^***
	Gender^a				-0.02	0.06	-0.31
	TS*Gender				0.13	0.10	1.39
	$R 2$ = 0.06				$R 2$ = 0.06
女性化	常数	4.14	0.14	28.91	0.00	0.03	0.13
	TS	0.38	0.04	10.12^***	0.39	0.04	10.23^***
	Gender				0.03	0.05	0.56
	TS*Gender				0.23	0.08	2.96^**
	$R 2$ = 0.11				$R 2$ = 0.12
坚毅品质
	常数	1.23	0.13	9.53^***	2.93	0.02	186.46^***
	TS	0.16	0.03	6.35^***	0.16	0.03	6.26^***
	MAS	0.10	0.02	5.05^***	0.10	0.02	4.99^***
	FEM	0.11	0.02	4.80^***	0.11	0.02	4.53^***
	Gender				0.02	0.03	0.70
	Gender*TS				-0.01	0.05	-0.26
	Gender*MAS				0.04	0.04	0.90
	Gender*FEM				0.07	0.05	1.46
	$R 2$ = 0.18				$R 2$ = 0.19

References 29

[1]	Alamer A. 2021. Grit and language learning: construct validation of L2-Grit scale and its relation to later vocabulary knowledge[J]. Educational Psychology 41(5):544-562.
[2]	Bem S. L. 1993. The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press.
[3]	Cohen J. 1992. Statistical power analysis[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1(3):98-101.
[4]	De Freitas D. R. 2015. Sex role identity, emotional intelligence and satisfaction at work[D]. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
[5]	Duckworth A. L. & P. D. Quinn. 2009. Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale(Grit-S)[J]. Journal of Personality Assessment 91:166-174. doi: 10.1080/00223890802634290 pmid: 19205937
[6]	Harman D. 1967. A single factor test of common method variance[J]. Journal of Psychology 35:359-378.
[7]	Huselid R. F. & M. L. Cooper. 1992. Gender roles as mediators of sex differences in adolescent alcohol use and abuse[J]. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 33(4)348-362. pmid: 1464719
[8]	Li M., X. Liu & Z. Yu. 2023. Students’ emotional perceptions and attitudes toward English teacher feedback in cloud classroom learning environments during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD) 13(1):1-17.
[9]	Ma X., M. Jiang & L.C. Nong. 2023. The effect of teacher support on Chinese university students’ sustainable online learning engagement and online academic persistence in the post-epidemic era[J]. Frontiers in Psychology 14:1076552.
[10]	MacKinnon D. P., C., M. Lockwood & J. M. Hoffman, et al. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects[J]. Psychological Methods 7:83-104. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 pmid: 11928892
[11]	Martin. 2008. How domain specific is motivation and engagement across school, sport, and music? A substantive-methodological synergy assessing young sportspeople and musicians[J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33(4): 785-813.
[12]	OECD. 2015. PISA 2012 Technical Report. PISA, Paris: OECD Publishing[DB/OL]. [2015-4-21]. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2012-technical-report_6341a959-en.html .
[13]	Podsakoff P. M., S. B. Mackenzie & J. Y. Lee, et al. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 pmid: 14516251
[14]	Shields S. A. 2008. Gender: An intersectionality perspective[J]. Sex Roles 59(5-6):301-311.
[15]	Teimouri Y., L. Plonsky & F. Tabandeh. 2020. L2 grit: Passion and perseverance for second-language learning[J]. Language Teaching Research 26(5): 893-918.
[16]	Whitley B. E. 1985. Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses[J]. Sex Roles 12:207-225.
[17]	Williams J. E. & D. L. Best. 1990. Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study, Rev[M]. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
[18]	Witt S. D. 1997. Parental influence on children’s socialization to gender roles[J]. Adolescence 32(126):253-270. pmid: 9179321
[19]	Wood W. & A. H. Eagly. 2002. A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences[J]. Psychological Bulletin 128(5):699-727. pmid: 12206191
[20]	黎晓娜. 2020. 教师支持、延迟满足与学生坚毅品质养成的关系研究[J]. 学校党建与思想教育 621(6):92-94.
[21]	刘电芝、黄会欣、贾凤芹, 等. 2011. 新编大学生性别角色量表揭示性别角色变迁[J]. 心理学报 43(6): 664-676.
[22]	马艳、傅根跃. 2004. 学校教育对小学生性别刻板印象发展的影响与塑造[J]. 外国中小学教育(2): 36-39.
[23]	陶云瑛、麻小珍、廖传景. 2015. “90后”大学生性别角色类型调查与比较研究[J]. 浙江工贸职业技术学院学报(1):64-67.
[24]	吴佳桧、傅海伦、张玉环. 2023. 感知社会支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:学习投入的中介作用[J]. 心理科学进展 31(4):552. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.00552
[25]	阳泽、张竞文、谭颖, 等. 2022. 手机依赖对大学生学习投入的影响: 社会支持和延迟满足的链式中介作用[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版) 44(2):178-184.
[26]	杨枫. 2019. 高等外语教育的国家意识、跨学科精神及应用理念[J]. 当代外语研究(2):1-2.
[27]	于晓平、林幸台. 2010. 角色楷模课程对高中数理资优女生性别角色,生涯自我效能与生涯发展影响之研究[J]. 教育科学研究期刊 55(1):27-61.
[28]	张燕琳、陆道恩. 2021. 教师支持和学业自我效能感对大学生英语在线学习投入的影响研究[J]. 海外英语 16:165-167.
[29]	中华人民共和国教育部. 2017. 普通高中课程方案[S]. 北京: 人民教育出版社.

	M
1.英语教师在线支持	3.71	0.67	--
2.女性化	5.56	0.77	0.33^*	--
3.男性化	4.90	0.93	0.24^*	0.46^*	--
4.在线英语学习的坚毅品质	2.93	0.50	0.32^*	0.33^*	0.32^*