诊断学理论与实践 ›› 2017, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03): 250-254.doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2017.03.003
陈慧, 姜美娇
收稿日期:2017-05-08
出版日期:2017-06-25
发布日期:2017-06-25
Received:2017-05-08
Online:2017-06-25
Published:2017-06-25
中图分类号:
陈慧, 姜美娇. 子宫内膜容受性的超声评估和研究认识[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2017, 16(03): 250-254.
| [1] Revel A.Defective endometrial receptivity[J]. Fertil Steril,2012,97(5):1028-1032. [2] Lessey BA.Assessment of endometrial receptivity[J]. Fertil Steril,2011,96(3):522-529. [3] Teklenburg G, Salker M, Heijnen C, et al.The molecular basis of recurrent pregnancy loss: impaired natural embryo selection[J]. Mol Hum Reprod,2010,16(12):886-895. [4] Paulson RJ.Hormonal induction of endometrial receptivity[J]. Fertil Steril,2011,96(3):530-535. [5] Friedler S, Schenker JG, Herman A, et al.The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review[J]. Hum Reprod Update,1996,2(4):323-335. [6] Ma NZ, Chen L, Dai W, et al.Influence of endometrial thickness on treatment outcomes following [7] Yuan X, Saravelos SH, Wang Q, et al.Endometrial thickness as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes in 10787 fresh IVF-ICSI cycles[J]. Reprod Biomed Online,2016,33(2):197-205. [8] Bonilla-Musoles F, Raga F, Osborne NG, et al.Endometrial receptivity: evaluation with ultrasound[J]. Ultrasound Q,2013,29(1):3-20. [9] Habibzadeh V, Nematolahi Mahani SN, Kamyab H.The correlation of factors affecting the endometrial thickness with pregnancy outcome in the IUI cycles[J]. Iran J Reprod Med,2011,9(1):41-46. [10] Fang R, Cai L, Xiong F, et al.The effect of endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration on pregnancy outcome in the first fresh IVF/ICSI cycle[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol,2016,32(6):473-476. [11] Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, et al.Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hum Reprod Update,2014,20(4):530-541. [12] Gonen Y, Casper RF.Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for [13] Smith SK.Regulation of angiogenesis in the endometrium[J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab,2001,12(4):147-151. [14] Chien LW, Au HK, Chen PL, et al.Assessment of ute-rine receptivity by the endometrial-subendometrial blood flow distribution pattern in women undergoing [15] Riad ON, Hak AA.Assessment of endometrial receptivity using Doppler ultrasonography in infertile women undergoing intrauterine insemination[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol,2014,30(1):70-73. [16] Gao MZ, Zhao XM, LI WY, et al.Assessment of uterine receptivity by endometrial and subendometrial blood flows measured by vaginal color doppler ultrasound in women undergoing IVF treatment[J]. J Reprod Contracept,2007,18(3):205-212. [17] Maugey-Laulom B, Commenges-Ducos M, Jullien V, et al.Endometrial vascularity and ongoing pregnancy after IVF[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2002,104(2):137-143. [18] Uysal S, Ozbay EP, Ekinci T, et al.Endometrial spiral artery Doppler parameters in unexplained infertility patients: is endometrial perfusion an important factor in the etiopathogenesis?[J]. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc,2012,13(3):169-171. [19] Zebitay AG, Tutumlu M, Verit FF, et al.A comparative analysis of arterial blood flow in unexplained infertility, tubal infertility and fertile groups[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol,2016,32(6):442-445. [20] Schild RL, Knobloch C, Dorn C, et al.Endometrial receptivity in an [21] Chen M, He Y, Zhang P, et al.Comparison of uterine receptivity between fertile and unexplained infertile women by assessment of endometrial and subendometrial perfusion using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: which index is better--peak intensity or area under the curve?[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol,2016,42(3):654-663. [22] Zollner U, Specketer MT, Dietl J, et al.3D-Endometrial volume and outcome of cryopreserved embryo replacement cycles[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2012,286(2):517-523. [23] Ng EH, Yeung WS, Ho PC.Endometrial and subendometrial vascularity are significantly lower in patients with endometrial volume 2.5 ml or less[J]. Reprod Biomed Online,2009,18(2):262-268. [24] Engels V, Sanfrutos L, Pérez-Medina T, et al.Evaluation of endometrial and subendometrial vascularization and endometrial volume by 3-D power Doppler ultrasound and its relationship with age and pregnancy in intraute-rine insemination cycles[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest,2011, 72(2):117-122. [25] Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, et al.Relationship between uterine blood flow and endometrial and subendometrial blood flows during stimulated and natural cycles[J]. Fertil Steril,2006,85(3):721-727. [26] Choudhary M, Chowdhary J, Swarankar M, et al.Predictive value of subendometrial - endometrial blood flow assessment by transvaginal 3D power doppler on the day of HCG on clinical outcome of IVF cycles[J]. Int J Res Med Sci,2015,3(11)::3114-3118. [27] Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, et al.Comparison of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound between stimulated and natural cycles in the same patients[J]. Hum Reprod,2004,19(10):2385-2390. [28] El-Mazny A, Abou-Salem N, Elshenoufy H.Doppler study of uterine hemodynamics in women with unexplained infertility[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2013,171(1):84-87. [29] Kim A, Han JE, Yoon TK, et al.Relationship between endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound and pregnancy after intrauterine insemination[J]. Fertil Steril,2010, 94(2):747-752. [30] Kim A, Jung H, Choi WJ, et al.Detection of endometrial and subendometrial vasculature on the day of embryo transfer and prediction of pregnancy during fresh in vitro fertilization cycles[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol,2014,53(3):360-365. [31] Mercé LT, Barco MJ, Bau S, et al.Are endometrial parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler angiography related to [32] Wu HM, Chiang CH, Huang HY, et al.Detection of the subendometrial vascularization flow index by three-dimensional ultrasound may be useful for predicting the pregnancy rate for patients undergoing [33] Alcázar JL.Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol,2006,4:56. [34] Zhang T, He Y, Wang Y, et al.The role of three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound parameters measured on hCG day in the prediction of pregnancy during in vitro fertilization treatment[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2016,203:66-71. [35] Dorn C, Reinsberg J, Willeke C, et al.Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound of the subendometrial blood flow under the administration of a contrast agent (Levovist)[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2004,270(2):94-98. [36] Abdallah Y, Naji O, Saso S, et al.Ultrasound assessment of the peri-implantation uterus: a review[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2012,39(6):612-619. |
| [1] | 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院肺小结节诊治和管理学科群专家组. 肺结节活检术风险管理瑞金专家共识[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(01): 22-31. |
| [2] | 杨晓辰, 朱圆, 孙琼, 余小萍, 张娴. 主观认知下降的影响因素、评估与干预研究新进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(01): 90-94. |
| [3] | 陈曦, 杜鹃. 多发性骨髓瘤预后风险的精准评估[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(06): 522-528. |
| [4] | 李海. 慢加急肝衰竭的诊断标准及管理[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(05): 434-438. |
| [5] | 叶晨静, 张弦, 周淑颖, 张晨莉, 龚艳春, 童建菁, 阎骅. 操作技能直接观察评估考核在全科住院医师规范化培训中的应用及效果评价[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(03): 311-313. |
| [6] | 陈信光, 张凤祥. 特定人群室性心律失常风险评估进展及策略[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(06): 549-554. |
| [7] | 刘彤, 王鑫. 心房颤动预后不良风险的评估策略[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(06): 555-558. |
| [8] | 游利. 重视骨转换指标的临床应用及评估[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(03): 214-218. |
| [9] | 丁凤鸣, 周妍, 田雪, 廖若敏, 张杏怡. 胜任力模型在呼吸与危重症医学科进修医师培训中的应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(02): 203-205. |
| [10] | 马文明, 李强, 卓然, 冒永鑫, 戴军, 罗艳, 孙福康. 嗜铬细胞瘤术前CT影像学参数与围手术期参数的相关性研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(02): 172-176. |
| [11] | 毛毅敏, 黄伸伸, 和雪改. 围手术期静脉血栓栓塞症形成风险评估及抗凝药物管理[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(1): 16-20. |
| [12] | 蒋荣珍, 钱智敏. 子痫前期的预测、预防研究现状及进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(06): 605-712. |
| [13] | 林建华, 缪慧娴. 妊娠合并心脏病的分类诊断和妊娠风险评估[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(06): 613-618. |
| [14] | 李欣欣, 肖淑珍, 谭希婧, 倪语星, 韩立中. 评估新型奈瑟嗜血杆菌药敏试剂盒测试流感嗜血杆菌药敏结果[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(05): 526-531. |
| [15] | 张玉奇, 鲍圣芳. 血管环的产前超声心动图诊断及预后评估[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(05): 487-490. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
