Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (03): 328-332.doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2025.03.012

• Original article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Correlation between severe coronary stenosis and recurrence after atrial fibrillation cryoablation

LUO Xiaoying(), DONG Fengwei, XU Yan, WU Liqun, QI Wenhang   

  1. Department of Cardiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2025-01-03 Accepted:2025-04-07 Online:2025-06-25 Published:2025-06-25
  • Contact: LUO Xiaoying E-mail:luoxiaoying2003@qq.com

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the correlation between severe coronary stenosis detected by coronary CT angio-graphy (CCTA) before cryoablation and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Methods From January 2021 to November 2022, 613 consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing first-time cryoablation and successful preprocedural CCTA screening were enrolled. Severe coronary stenosis on CCTA was defined as >70% stenosis in at least one major coronary vessel. Patients were divided into two groups: severe stenosis group (n=53) and non-severe stenosis group (n=560). All patients were regularly followed up after ablation to observe safety endpoints such as AF recurrence and surgical complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess AF-free survival rate, and multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify predictors of AF recurrence. Results 22.5% of patients were diagnosed with coronary heart disea-se (CHD), of whom 8.6% (53/560) had severe stenosis on pre-ablation CCTA. Compared to the non-severe stenosis group, the severe coronary stenosis group had higher age [(69.6±10.3) years vs. (62.3±11.9) years], higher prevalence of persistent AF (59.3% vs. 31.6%), higher CHA2DS2 -VASc score (2.3±1.6 vs. 1.5±1.4), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [(48.8%±10.3%) vs. (57.2%±8.9%)], higher left atrial volume index (LAVI) [(50.3±11.7) mL/m² vs. (37.0±12.3) mL/m²], and higher E/A ratio (1.6±0.4 vs. 1.1±0.5) (all P<0.05). Among the 53 patients with severe stenosis detected by CCTA, 50 (94.3%) were newly diagnosed with CHD. After a median follow-up of 28 months, the AF recurrence rate was 20.1% (123/613). The severe stenosis group showed an AF recurrence rate of 35.8% (19/53), significantly higher than the 18.6% (104/560) in the non-severe stenosis group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the safety endpoint between the two groups (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed lower AF-free survival rate in the severe stenosis group (71.6% vs. 84.8%, P=0.039). Multivariate Cox regression identified age (OR=1.20, 95%CI: 1.09-1.39, P=0.033), persistent AF (OR=2.750, 95%CI: 1.64-5.37, P=0.001), and LAVI (OR=1.14, 95%CI: 1.10-1.38, P=0.008) as independent predictors of AF recurrence. Conclusions Patients with severe coronary stenosis before ablation screening have lower AF-free survival rate, but severe coronary stenosis itself is not an independent predictor of AF recurrence after cryoablation.

Key words: Cryoablation, Coronary CT angiography, Severe coronary stenosis, Atrial fibrillation recurrence

CLC Number: