Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (06): 677-683.doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2022.06.003
• Interpretation of guideline • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-11-11
Online:
2022-12-25
Published:
2023-04-23
CLC Number:
影响安全或功能的标志 | 严重 | 标准 |
---|---|---|
生命安全情况 | 重症监护、气道支持、威胁安全的自主神经功能障碍 | 没有左边情况 |
行动能力 | 约束在床、可能受伤的运动障碍 | 没有约束在床 |
护理级别 | 全天候安全支持、一对一照护 | 不需要全天候的护理 |
精神症状 | 自杀想法、危险的冲动控制问题(受伤风险)、自伤行为 | 精神症状不会立刻影响生命安全 |
自理能力 | 不能自理、需要完全协助(如厕、穿衣和喂食) | 能够自理或部分自理 |
沟通能力 | 不能表达清楚 | 能沟通或表达需求 |
警觉性 | 对当前环境无反应 | 能大致注意当前环境的事件 |
癫痫发作 | 频繁需要抢救药物终止癫痫发作 | 癫痫发作不需要抢救药物干预 |
儿童版本的改良Rankin量表评分 | 4~5分 | 0~3分 |
评分分数 | 描述 | 注释 |
---|---|---|
0 | 无症状 | 无 |
1 | 不影响儿童日常活动和玩耍及学习习惯的非致残性症状 | 玩耍、学习习惯包括上学或幼儿园 |
2 | 轻度症状,导致儿童日常活动和玩耍、学习习惯受到一些限制,但不影响与年龄相符的基本功能 | 基本功能为饮水、进食、穿衣、脱衣、梳头、洗涤、沐浴 症状:可能包括轻度的身体、认知和/或相关症状 |
3 | 中度症状,严重干扰日常活动和玩耍、学习习惯,或不能完全独立地实现与年龄相符基本功能 | 基本功能和症状同上 |
4 | 中重度的症状,明显不能独立地实现与年龄相符基本功能,但患者不需要持续的关注 | 基本功能和症状同上 |
5 | 严重残疾,完全依赖,需要持续的关注 | 约束在床,可能有意识受损、躁动、自主神经障碍和严重的运动障碍 |
6 | 死亡 | 无 |
免疫治疗 | 使用类型 | 使用剂量/方式 |
---|---|---|
静注甲强龙 | 一线免疫治疗 | 每天20~30 mg/kg(最大1 g/d),3~5 d |
延长的一线免疫治疗 | 每天20~30 mg/kg(最大1 g/d),1~3 d,每月1次 | |
口服强的松 | 一线免疫治疗:静注皮质激素的替代方案 一线免疫治疗:静注皮质激素后减量 延长的一线免疫治疗 | 每天2 mg/kg(最大 60 mg/d),1 周,然后逐渐减量 |
口服地塞米松 | 一线免疫治疗:静注皮质激素的替代方案 | 每天20 mg/m2(分成2或3次, 最大12 mg 1 d 3次),3 d |
一线免疫治疗:静注皮质激素后减量 延长的一线免疫治疗 | 每天20 mg/m2(分成2或3次, 最大12 mg 1 d 3次),3 d,每3~4周 | |
治疗性血浆置换 | 一线免疫治疗 | 1个疗程通常是在7~10 d,进行5~7次单倍或双倍血浆体积置换 |
静注免疫球蛋白 | 一线免疫治疗 | 2 g/kg,分2~5 d给药 |
延长一线免疫治疗 | 1~2 g/kg,分1~2 d给药,每月1次 | |
静注利妥昔单抗 | 二线免疫治疗 | 以下剂量可接受:500~1 000 mg(体重<40 kg,500 mg;体重>40 kg,1 000 mg)2次,间隔2周给药,或375~750 mg/m2(最大1 g),2次间隔 2 周给药,或375 mg/m2(最大1 g)每周1次,连续4 周 |
维持免疫抑制(>6个月) | 当 CD19细胞出现再增殖(或第一个疗程后,约6个月),重复给利妥昔单抗(与上述剂量相同或根据当地建议减少剂量) | |
静注环磷酰胺 | 二线免疫治疗 | 500~1 000 mg/m2(最大 1 500 mg),每月1次冲击治疗,最长6个月 |
口服吗替麦考酚酯 | 维持免疫抑制(>6个月) | 每天600 mg /m2(最大1 g/次),每日2次 |
静注托珠单抗 | 升级二线免疫治疗 | 每月给予1次,12 mg/kg(<30 kg)或8 mg/kg(≥30 kg)(最大800 mg),超过6个月或更长时间(所需免疫抑制持续时间) |
[9] |
Eyre M, Hacohen Y, Lamb K, et al. Utility and safety of plasma exchange in paediatric neuroimmune disorders[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2019, 61(5):540-546.
doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14150 pmid: 30659589 |
[10] |
Mo Y, Wang L, Zhu L, et al. Analysis of Risk Factors for a Poor Prognosis in Patients with Anti- N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis and Construction of a Prognostic Composite Score[J]. J Clin Neurol, 2020, 16(3):438-447.
doi: 10.3988/jcn.2020.16.3.438 URL |
[11] |
Xu X, Lu Q, Huang Y, et al. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis: A single-center, longitudinal study in China[J]. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm, 2019, 7(1):e633.
doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000633 URL |
[12] |
Lee W J, Lee S T, Shin Y W, et al. Teratoma Removal, Steroid, IVIG, Rituximab and Tocilizumab (T-SIRT) in Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis[J]. Neurotherapeutics, 2021, 18(1):474-487.
doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00921-7 |
[13] | Yang X Z, Zhu H D, Ren H T, et al. Utility and Safety of Intrathecal Methotrexate Treatment in Severe Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptor Encephalitis: A Pilot Study[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2018, 131(2):156-160. |
[14] |
Scheibe F, Prüss H, Mengel A M, et al. Bortezomib for treatment of therapy-refractory anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis[J]. Neurology, 2017, 88(4):366-370.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003536 pmid: 28003505 |
[15] |
Titulaer M J, Mccracken L, Gabilondo I, et al. Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12(2):157-165.
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70310-1 pmid: 23290630 |
[16] |
Dale R C, Brilot F, Duffy L V, et al. Utility and safety of rituximab in pediatric autoimmune and inflammatory CNS disease[J]. Neurology, 2014, 83(2):142-150.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000570 pmid: 24920861 |
[17] |
Gong X, Chen C, Liu X, et al. Long-term Functional Outcomes and Relapse of Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis: A Cohort Study in Western China[J]. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm, 2021, 8(2):e958.
doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000958 URL |
[18] |
Nosadini M, Granata T, Matricardi S, et al. Relapse risk factors in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2019, 61(9):1101-1107.
doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14267 pmid: 31175679 |
[1] |
Vitaliani R, Mason W, Ances B, et al. Paraneoplastic encephalitis, psychiatric symptoms, and hypoventilation in ovarian teratoma[J]. Ann Neurol, 2005, 58(4):594-604.
doi: 10.1002/ana.20614 pmid: 16178029 |
[2] |
Dalmau J, Tüzün E, Wu H Y, et al. Paraneoplastic anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis associated with ovarian teratoma[J]. Ann Neurol, 2007, 61(1):25-36.
doi: 10.1002/ana.21050 pmid: 17262855 |
[3] | 中华医学会神经病学分会神经感染性疾病与脑脊液细胞学学组. 中国自身免疫性脑炎诊治专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2022, 55(9):931-949. |
Chinese Society of Neuroinfectious Diseases and Cerebrospinal Fluid Cytology. Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of autoimmune encephalitis (2022 edition)[J]. Chin J Neurol, 2022, 55(9):931-949. | |
[4] |
Graus F, Titulaer M J, Balu R, et al. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2016, 15(4):391-404.
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00401-9 pmid: 26906964 |
[5] | 中华医学会神经病学分会. 中国自身免疫性脑炎诊治专家共识[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2017, 50(2):91-98. |
Neurology Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of autoimmune encephalitis[J]. Chin J Neurol, 2017, 50(2):91-98. | |
[6] | Cellucci T, Van Mater H, Graus F, et al. Clinical approach to the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis in the pediatric patient[J]. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinfl-amm, 2020, 7(2):e663. |
[7] |
Ho A C C, Mohammad S S, Pillai S C, et al. High sensitivity and specificity in proposed clinical diagnostic criteria for anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2017, 59(12):1256-1260.
doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13579 pmid: 28972277 |
[8] |
Suppiej A, Nosadini M, Zuliani L, et al. Plasma exchange in pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis: A systematic review[J]. Brain Dev, 2016, 38(7):613-622.
doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2016.01.009 URL |
[19] |
Hardy D. Autoimmune Encephalitis in Children[J]. Pediatr Neurol, 2022, 132:56-66.
doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.05.004 pmid: 35640473 |
[1] | CHEN Sheng, ZHANG Yizongheng. Anti-IgLON5 disease: relationship between neuroimmunology and neurodegeneration [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(06): 663-668. |
[2] | ZHANG Chao, GAO Xue. Advances in clinical diagnosis of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(06): 669-676. |
[3] | REN Xinping, LI Junjian, ZHANG Jie, ZHAN Weiwei. Advances in the application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of focal liver lesions [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(06): 684-690. |
[4] | . [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(04): 425-430. |
[5] | . [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(04): 419-424. |
[6] | HUANG Chen, JING Feng, YANG Zhitao, et al . Exploration and practice of construction of nursing management system in shelter hospital [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(02): 286-290. |
[7] | LIANG Jing, HUANG Chen, JIANG Yan, et al . Management strategy of nursing for prevention and control of COVID-19 in emergency infusion room [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(02): 281-285. |
[8] | ZHANG Hong, ZHU Mengmeng, et al . Safety nursing for eating in the elderly during the COVID-19 pandemic [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(02): 277-280. |
[9] | ZHOU Jianping, YANG Zhenhua, WANG Yichen, et al . Practice and thinking of the medical team of the elderly medical assistance center in the prevention and control of COVID-19 in Shanghai [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(02): 265-269. |
[10] | ZHA Qinghua, WANG Xiaoning, ZHANG Yin, et al . Exploration and practice of nucleic acid sampling outside hospital during the epidemic period of COVID-19 pandemic [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(02): 229-233. |
[11] | YU Ping, QIU Weiyu, WANG Xu, et al . Practice and exploration of drug security management in large shelter hospitals [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(02): 221-224. |
[12] | JIANG Yan, LIN Wei, HUANG Chen, et al . Exploration and practice of emergency supplies management mode in emergency department under COVID-19 pandemic [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(02): 212-215. |
[13] | TANG Jie, MA Longxin, CAO Qing, et al . Study on the construction of smart shelter hospital based on new generation information technology [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(02): 196-204. |
[14] | JIANG Yan, CHEN Ting, HUANG Chen, PAN Peiqian, JING Feng, et al . Construction and practice of emergency response capability training program for all staff in emergency medical ward under COVID-19:Emergency response strategy [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(02): 189-195. |
[15] | MENG Jun, JIN Peipei, CHEN Changqiang, CHEN Jiuming, FAN Zhenjia, CHEN Shikai, DAI Jing, et al . Emergency transformation experience of the laboratory department of a hospital designated for admission of patients with novel coronavirus infection in emergency conversion [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2022, 21(02): 184-188. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||