D-二聚体联合半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C预测急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后的主要不良心血管事件
收稿日期: 2021-09-02
网络出版日期: 2022-08-09
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(81970327);国家自然科学基金项目(82000368);上海交通大学医学院高峰高原计划——“研究型医师”项目(RC20190086)
Value of D-dimer combined with cystatin C in predicting the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Received date: 2021-09-02
Online published: 2022-08-09
目的:探讨D-二聚体联合半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂(胱抑素)C对接受经皮冠脉介入术(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)治疗的急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction, AMI)患者发生主要不良心血管事件(major adverse cardiovascular event, MACE)的预测价值。方法:选取我院2014年1月至2017年12月期间,接受PCI治疗并且基线资料完整的AMI住院患者287例,根据患者入院后血清D-二聚体、胱抑素C中位数水平,将患者分为4组,其中组1:D-二聚体<0.33 mg/L、胱抑素C<1.06 mg/L;组2:D-二聚体<0.33 mg/L、胱抑素C≥1.06 mg/L;组3:D-二聚体≥0.33 mg/L、胱抑素C<1.06 mg/L;组4:D-二聚体≥0.33 mg/L、胱抑素C≥1.06 mg/L。采用多因素Cox回归分析评估D-二聚体联合胱抑素C预测MACE发生的价值。结果:中位随访时间2.89年。多因素Cox回归分析显示,校正年龄、性别和传统危险因素后,组4 MACE发生率显著升高[风险比(hazard ratio, HR)=2.71, 95%置信区间(confidence interval,CI):1.37~5.36, P<0.01]。结论:D-二聚体联合胱抑素C可有效预测接受PCI治疗的AMI患者远期MACE发生。
席锐, 范骎, 王芳, 陶蓉, 顾刚 . D-二聚体联合半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C预测急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后的主要不良心血管事件[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2022 , 17(03) : 227 -232 . DOI: 10.16138/j.1673-6087.2022.03.010
Objective To investigate the predictive value of D-dimer combined with cystatin C level in the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular event(MACE) in the patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods From January 2014 to December 2017, 287 patients with acute myocardial infarction who received undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were selected. According to the median levels of serum D-dimer and cystatin C after admission, the patients were divided into four groups, group 1: D-dimer<0.33 mg/L, cystatin C<1.06 mg/L; group 2: D-dimer<0.33 mg/L, cystatin C≥1.06 mg/L; group 3: D-dimer≥0.33 mg/L, cystatin C<1.06 mg / L; group 4: D-dimer≥0.33 mg/L, cystatin C≥1.06 mg/L. The multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the value of D-dimer combined with cystatin C level in predicting the occurrence of MACE. Results The median time of follow up was 2.89 years. The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that, the incidence of MACE was significantly increased in the group with high D-dimer and cystatin C levels [hazard ratio (HR)=2.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37-5.36, P<0.01] after adjustment of age, gender and traditional risk factors. Conclusions The D-dimer combined with cystatin C can effectively predict the occurrence of MACE in the patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI.
[1] | 中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组. 中国心血管健康与疾病报告2019概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2020, 35(9): 833. |
[2] | Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction(2018)[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 72(18): 2231-2264. |
[3] | Weitz JI, Fredenburgh JC, Eikelboom JW. A test in context: D-dimer[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 70(19): 2411-2420. |
[4] | Bayes-Genis A, Mateo J, Santaló M, et al. D-dimer is an early diagnostic marker of coronary ischemia in patients with chest pain[J]. Am Heart J, 2000, 140(3): 379-384. |
[5] | Akgul O, Uyarel H, Pusuroglu H, et al. Predictive value of elevated D-dimer in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis, 2013, 24(7): 704-710. |
[6] | Huang D, Gao W, Wu R, et al. D-dimer level predicts inhospital adverse outcomes after primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2020, 305: 1-4. |
[7] | Pasala S, Carmody JB. How to use… serum creatinine, cystatin C and GFR[J]. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed, 2017, 102(1): 37-43. |
[8] | Onopiuk A, Tokarzewicz A, Gorodkiewicz E. Cystatin C: a kidney function biomarker[J]. Adv Clin Chem, 2015, 68: 57-69. |
[9] | Bargnoux AS, Barguil Y, Cavalier E, et al. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate using cystatin C[J]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris), 2019, 77(4): 375-380. |
[10] | Akgul O, Uyarel H, Ergelen M, et al. Predictive value of elevated cystatin C in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. J Crit Care, 2013, 28(5): 882. |
[11] | Tang L, Fang ZF, Zhou SH, et al. Association of serum cystatin C levels with myocardial perfusion and cardiac functional recovery in patients with anterior wall ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention[J]. Heart Vessels, 2016, 31(9): 1456-1466. |
[12] | Charoensri N, Pornratanarangsi S. D-dimer plasma levels in NSTE-ACS patient[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2011, 94 Suppl 1: S39-S45. |
[13] | Choi S, Jang WJ, Song YB, et al. D-dimer levels predict myocardial injury in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(8): e0160955. |
[14] | Luo E, Wang D, Liu B, et al. The value of dimer level in predicting contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after PCI[J]. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2020, 26: 1076029620944492. |
[15] | Guerchicoff A, Stone GW, Mehran R, et al. Analysis of biomarkers for risk of acute kidney injury after primary angioplasty for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the HORIZONS-AMI trial[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2015, 85(3): 335-342. |
[16] | Silva D, Cortez-Dias N, Jorge C, et al. Cystatin C as prognostic biomarker in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2012, 109(10): 1431-1438. |
[17] | Chen Y, Fan Y, Men M, et al. High cystatin C levels predict long-term mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing late percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2019, 42(5):572-578. |
[18] | Fu Z, Yang X, Shen M, et al. Prognostic ability of cystatin C and homocysteine plasma levels for long-term outcomes in very old acute myocardial infarction patients[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2018, 13: 1201-1209. |
[19] | Wang GN, Sun K, Hu DL, et al. Serum cystatin C levels are associated with coronary artery disease and its severity[J]. Clin Biochem, 2014, 47(16-17):176-181. |
[20] | Jin S, Xu J, Shen G, et al. Predictive value of circulating cystatin C level in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis[J]. Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 2020, 81(1): 1-7. |
[21] | Lázaro I, Rueda F, Cediel G, et al. Circulating omega-3 fatty acids and incident adverse events in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020, 76(18): 2089-2097. |
[22] | Kahles F, Rückbeil MV, Mertens RW, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 levels predict cardiovascular risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Eur Heart J, 2020, 41(7): 882-889. |
[23] | Asleh R, Enriquez-Sarano M, Jaffe AS, et al. Galectin-3 levels and outcomes after myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73(18): 2286-2295. |
[24] | Caidahl K, Hartford M, Ravn-Fischer A, et al. Homeostatic chemokines and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 74(6): 774-782. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |