外科理论与实践 ›› 2020, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (04): 301-305.doi: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2020.04.007
赵诗葳1,2, 沈子贇1,2, 王建承1,2, 彭承宏1,2, 张俊1,2(), 吴卫泽1,2()
收稿日期:
2020-06-02
出版日期:
2020-07-25
发布日期:
2022-07-18
通讯作者:
张俊,吴卫泽
E-mail:zj11477@rjh.com.cn;wuweize2003@163.com
基金资助:
ZHAO Shiwei1,2, SHEN Ziyun1,2, WANG Jiancheng1,2, PENG Chenghong1,2, ZHANG Jun1,2(), WU Weize1,2()
Received:
2020-06-02
Online:
2020-07-25
Published:
2022-07-18
Contact:
ZHANG Jun,WU Weize
E-mail:zj11477@rjh.com.cn;wuweize2003@163.com
摘要:
目的:研究术前胆道引流方式对围术期并发症发生的影响。方法:回顾本中心2012年1月至2019年12月共448例术前胆道引流低位恶性梗阻性黄疸病人完成胰十二指肠切除术的临床资料。238例行经皮肝穿刺胆道引流术(percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage, PTCD),210例行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ERCP)引流。行ERCP引流的病人中,101例行内镜胆道支架置入术(endoscopic bi-liary stenting,EBS),其余109例接受鼻胆管胆道引流术。分析不同胆道引流方式的操作失败率及围术期并发症发生。结果:相比于PTCD,ERCP的操作失败率较高(P=0.034)。ERCP术后胰瘘及再次手术发生率较高(P=0.005和P=0.025)。亚组分析,EBS组的术后总体并发症发生率比PTCD组高(P=0.014),主要体现在胰瘘及再次手术发生率(P<0.001和P=0.041)。其他并发症发生率差异无统计学意义。结论:对于低位恶性梗阻性黄疸病人,在胰十二指肠切除术前使用PTCD进行胆道引流比ERCP有更大的优势。
中图分类号:
赵诗葳, 沈子贇, 王建承, 彭承宏, 张俊, 吴卫泽. 术前胆道引流方式对合并梗阻性黄疸病人胰十二指肠切除术的影响[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(04): 301-305.
ZHAO Shiwei, SHEN Ziyun, WANG Jiancheng, PENG Chenghong, ZHANG Jun, WU Weize. Effect of biliary drainage methods on patients with obstructive jaundice undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2020, 25(04): 301-305.
表1
恶性梗阻性黄疸病人的临床特征
临床特征 | 数据 |
---|---|
性别(n) | |
男 | 304 |
女 | 144 |
平均年龄(岁) 平均BMI | 63.8±10.4 22.7±3.0 |
最终采取的引流方式(n) | |
ERCP EBS ENBD PTCD | 210 101 109 238 |
手术方式(n) 开腹 机器人 | 376 72 |
术后病理(n) | |
胰腺导管腺癌 胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤 胆总管恶性肿瘤 壶腹部腺癌 十二指肠乳头恶性肿瘤 | 314 1 37 58 38 |
减黄前总胆红素(中位,IQR,μmol/L) 术前总胆红素(中位,IQR,μmol/L) | 250.1(188.5~335.2) 115.7(76.7~173.5) |
术前引流时间(中位,IQR,d) | 8.0(6.0~14.0) |
表3
ERCP组与PTCD组术后并发症发生比较[n(%)]
项目 | ERCP组(n=210) | PTCD组(n=238) | P值 |
---|---|---|---|
总体并发症 | 110(52.4) | 109(45.8) | 0.164 |
围术期死亡 | 5(2.4) | 8(3.4) | 0.537 |
再次手术 | 16(7.6) | 7(2.9) | 0.025a) |
胰瘘 | 51(24.3) | 33(13.9) | 0.005a) |
胆瘘 | 7(3.3) | 8(3.4) | 0.987 |
胃肠吻合口瘘 | 4(1.9) | 4(1.7) | 0.858 |
腹腔感染 | 41(19.5) | 58(24.4) | 0.217 |
腹腔出血 | 19(9.0) | 21(8.8) | 0.934 |
切口感染 | 18(8.6) | 17(7.1) | 0.574 |
胃排空延迟 | 37(17.6) | 35(14.7) | 0.402 |
心功能不全 | 8(3.8) | 9(3.8) | 0.988 |
肺功能不全 | 8(3.8) | 8(3.4) | 0.799 |
肝功能不全 | 6(2.9) | 9(3.8) | 0.587 |
肾功能不全 | 4(1.9) | 6(2.5) | 0.659 |
中位术后住院时间(d) | 20.5(16.0~28.0) | 19.0(14.8~28.3) | 0.115 |
表4
EBS组与PTCD组术后并发症发生比较[n(%)]
项目 | EBS组(n=101) | PTCD组(n=238) | P值 |
---|---|---|---|
总体并发症 | 61(60.4) | 109(45.8) | 0.014a) |
围术期死亡 | 2(2.0) | 8(3.4) | 0.492 |
再次手术 | 8(7.9) | 7(2.9) | 0.041a) |
胰瘘 | 33(32.7) | 33(13.9) | <0.001a) |
胆瘘 | 2(2.0) | 8(3.4) | 0.492 |
胃肠吻合口瘘 | 1(1.0) | 4(1.7) | 0.630 |
腹腔感染 | 27(26.7) | 58(24.4) | 0.646 |
腹腔出血 | 10(9.9) | 21(8.8) | 0.753 |
切口感染 | 10(9.9) | 17(7.1) | 0.391 |
胃排空延迟 | 16(15.8) | 35(14.7) | 0.789 |
心功能不全 | 4(4.0) | 9(3.8) | 0.937 |
肺功能不全 | 6(5.9) | 8(3.4) | 0.275 |
肝功能不全 | 1(1.0) | 9(3.8) | 0.165 |
肾功能不全 | 0 | 6(2.5) | 0.107 |
中位术后住院时间(d) | 21.0 (16.0~27.0) | 19.0(14.8~28.3) | 0.250 |
[1] |
Rungsakulkij N, Mingphruedhi S, Tangtawee P, et al. Risk factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective study in a Thai tertiary center[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 9(12):270-280.
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i12.270 pmid: 29359033 |
[2] |
Balachandran P, Sikora SS, Raghavendra Rao RV, et al. Haemorrhagic complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2004, 74(11):945-950.
pmid: 15550080 |
[3] |
Marcus SG, Dobryansky M, Shamamian P, et al. Endoscopic biliary drainage before pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancies[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 1998, 26(2):125-129.
pmid: 9563924 |
[4] |
Lygidakis NJ, van der Heyde MN, Lubbers MJ. Evaluation of preoperative biliary drainage in the surgical mana-gement of pancreatic head carcinoma[J]. Acta Chir Scand, 1987, 153(11-12):665-668.
pmid: 3434110 |
[5] |
Gundry SR, Strodel WE, Knol JA, et al. Efficacy of preoperative biliary tract decompression in patients with obstructive jaundice[J]. Arch Surg, 1984, 119(6):703-708.
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390180065011 URL |
[6] |
Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Chiorean EG, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, version 1.2019[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2019, 17(3):202-210.
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0014 URL |
[7] |
Duan F, Cui L, Bai Y, et al. Comparison of efficacy and complications of endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2017, 17(1):27.
doi: 10.1186/s40644-017-0129-1 URL |
[8] |
Lee PJ, Podugu A, Wu D, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2018, 20(6):477-486.
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.12.007 URL |
[9] |
van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(2):129-137.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903230 URL |
[10] |
Shen Z, Zhang J, Zhao S, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage of severely obstructive jaundiced patients decreases overall postoperative complications after pancrea-ticoduodenectomy: A retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Pancreatology, 2020, 20(3):529-536.
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.02.002 URL |
[11] |
Leng JJ, Zhang N, Dong JH. Percutaneous transhepatic and endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant biliary tract obstruction: a meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2014, 12(1):272.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-272 URL |
[12] | 张啸, 郭英辉, 林秀英. 预切开窗后插管失败再次胆管插管的体会[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2014, 31(4):210-212. |
[13] |
Colan-Hernandez J, Aldana A, Concepción M, et al. Optimal timing for a second ERCP after failure of initial bi-liary cannulation following precut sphincterotomy: an analysis of experience at two tertiary centers[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(9):3711-3717.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5410-z pmid: 28127713 |
[14] |
Dorcaratto D, Hogan NM, Muñoz E, et al. Is percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage better than endosco-pic drainage in the management of jaundiced patients awaiting pancreaticoduodenectomy? a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2018, 29(5):676-687.
doi: S1051-0443(18)30766-8 pmid: 29548873 |
[15] |
Fujii T, Yamada S, Suenaga M, et al. Preoperative internal biliary drainage increases the risk of bile juice infection and pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective observational study[J]. Pancreas, 2015, 44(3):465-470.
doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000265 URL |
[16] |
Son JH, Kim J, Lee SH, et al. The optimal duration of preoperative biliary drainage for periampullary tumors that cause severe obstructive jaundice[J]. Am J Surg, 2013, 206(1):40-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.07.047 URL |
[17] |
Sandini M, Honselmann KC, Birnbaum DJ, et al. preo-perative biliary stenting and major morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy: does elapsed time matter? The FRAGERITA Study Group[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 268(5):808-814.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002838 pmid: 30303874 |
[18] | 王坚, 吴志勇. 恶性梗阻性黄疸术前胆道引流的争议[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2007, 12(4):320-322. |
[19] |
Ahn KS, Kang KJ, Kim YH, et al. Impact of preoperative endoscopic cholangiography and biliary drainage in Ampulla of Vater cancer[J]. Surg Oncol, 2018, 27(1):82-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.12.002 URL |
[20] |
Miura F, Sano K, Wada K, et al. Prognostic impact of type of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Am J Surg, 2017, 214(2):256-261.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.010 URL |
[1] | 胡冰. 困难胆管结石的ERCP诊治[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(3): 189-192. |
[2] | 张敏敏, 邹多武. 超声内镜在可疑胆总管结石诊治中的作用[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(3): 193-197. |
[3] | 翁昊, 王雪峰. 侧视镜治疗毕Ⅱ式胃切除术后胆管结石的要领与策略[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(3): 203-209. |
[4] | 翁昊, 翁明哲, 束翌俊, 顾钧, 张文杰, 王雪峰. 乳头球囊扩张及机械碎石先后顺序对ERCP治疗胆总管结石影响的前瞻性研究[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(3): 210-214. |
[5] | 龚笑勇, 陈胜, 任家俊, 叶枫, 蔡强, 蔡琳燕, 刘远滨, 隋亮. SpyGlass内镜直视系统治疗内镜和外科手术治疗失败的困难胆管结石[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(3): 215-220. |
[6] | 石加利, 程思乐, 金杭斌, 张筱凤. ERCP联合SpyGlass DS直视下液电碎石治疗困难胆总管结石[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(02): 165-168. |
[7] | 杜重临, 李晓静, 范秋维, 夏一梦. 右美托咪定复合舒芬太尼麻醉在ERCP的效果分析[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(03): 240-243. |
[8] | 周海斌, 金杭斌, 黄海涛, 杨晶, 吕文, 张筱凤, 杨建锋. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术诊治胰胆汇合异常[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(02): 163-166. |
[9] | 翁明哲, 翁昊, 陶怡菁, 顾钧, 张文杰, 王雪峰. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影在小儿胰胆管汇合异常中的诊疗作用(附74例报告)[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(06): 468-472. |
[10] | 王宏光, 陶丽莹, 郭庆梅. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合SpyGlass DS胆道镜治疗胆囊颈结石和急性胆囊炎[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(06): 481-485. |
[11] | 刘宇虹, 邓刚, 陈俊宗(综述), 汤地(审校). 胰胆管汇合异常的诊治进展[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(06): 523-528. |
[12] | 吴卫泽, 张圣道. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的发展和现况[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(04): 273-276. |
[13] | 龚笑勇, 陈胜, 任家俊, 叶枫, 和志文, 刘远滨, 隋亮. 新冠肺炎疫情期间内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的必要性和安全性[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(04): 294-300. |
[14] | 唐睿, 丁俊, 李甫, 黄金鑫, 张晞文. 早期经胰管方向Oddi括约肌预切开可减少ERCP术后胰腺炎发生[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(04): 306-310. |
[15] | 王申捷, 毛志海, 郑民华. 胆囊结石合并胆总管结石时的一期治疗临床研究:术中ERCP与腹腔镜胆总管探查术的比较[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(01): 65-68. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||