疝修补材料的研究进展及展望

doi:10.16139/j.1007-9610.2022.04.021

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

疝是普外科医师临床诊治的常见疾病之一,手术为主要治疗方式。开腹和腹腔镜无张力修补术需使用疝修补材料。疝修补材料根据材质不同分为不可吸收、可吸收人工合成补片以及生物补片和复合补片。此外,还有编织方式、孔径大小和密度的分类。本文综述不同材质分类补片的特点。展望疝修补材料未来,材料需具有最大化的生物惰性、最小化的总体面积、最优化的表面性质、最适宜的补片重量以及生物力学强度。在认识疝病理生理及补片材质特性的基础上作进一步的研究。

关键词: 疝, 补片材料, 生物补片, 复合补片

Abstract:

Hernia is one of common diseases diagnosed and treated in clinic by general surgeons with surgery as major procedure of treatment. Hernia repair materials are used in conventional and laparoscopic tension-free repair. Classification of repair materials based on material quality includes non-absorbable or absorbable man made synthetic mesh, biologic mesh and compound mesh. The mesh would also be classified according to woven way, pore size and density. The hernia repair material in future will be prospected which may have the maximized biologic inertia, minimized overall area, the most excellent surface nature, the most optimized weight of mesh, and biomechanical strength. Further study will be needed on the base of recognition of pathophysiology and material property of mesh.

Key words: Hernia, Mesh material, Biological mesh, Compound mesh

中图分类号:

R656.2

于凡, 伍波, 康杰. 疝修补材料的研究进展及展望[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(04): 375-379.

YU Fan, WU Bo, KANG Jie. Study on hernia repair materials: progress and prospect[J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2022, 27(04): 375-379.

参考文献 29

[1]	Disease GBD, Injury I, Prevalence C. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2018, 92(10159):1789-1858.
[2]	HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1):1-165.
[3]	王芳. 生物补片材料在盆底功能重建中的应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2012, 16(25):4719-4726.
[4]	Romanowska M, Okninski T, Pawlak J. Modern materials applied in hernioplasty[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2016, 88(4):226-231. doi: 10.1515/pjs-2016-0057 pmid: 27648626
[5]	Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, et al. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias[J]. Arch Surg, 1998, 133(4):378-382. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.4.378 URL
[6]	Stavert B, Chan DL, Ozmen J, et al. Laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal groin hernia repair with self-gripping polyester mesh: a series of 780 repairs[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2019, 89(10):1261-1264. doi: 10.1111/ans.15378 URL
[7]	Cevasco M, Itani KM. Ventral hernia repair with synthe-tic, composite, and biologic mesh: characteristics, indications, and infection profile[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2012, 13(4):209-215. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.123 URL
[8]	O′Dwyer PJ, Chew C, Qandeel H. Long term outcome and elasticity of a polyester mesh used for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(2):489-493. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02486-6 URL
[9]	Serrano-Aroca A, Pous-Serrano S. Prosthetic meshes for hernia repair: state of art, classification, biomaterials, antimicrobial approaches, and fabrication methods[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2021, 109(12):2695-2719. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37238 pmid: 34021705
[10]	Peeters E, Spiessens C, Oyen R, et al. Sperm motility after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with lightweight meshes: 3-year follow-up of a randomised clinical trial[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(3):361-367. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-1028-9 pmid: 23269401
[11]	El-Komy H, El-Gendi A, Abdel-Salam W, et al. Self-fixing parietex progrip versus the standard sutured prolene mesh in tension-free repair of inguinal hernia: effect on testicular volume and testicular blood flow[J]. Updates Surg, 2018, 70(4):513-520. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0554-0 pmid: 29948662
[12]	Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(2):289-321. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3917-8 pmid: 25398194
[13]	Wolf MT, Carruthers CA, Dearth CL, et al. Polypropylene surgical mesh coated with extracellular matrix mitigates the host foreign body response[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2014, 102(1):234-246. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34671 URL
[14]	Heymann F, von Trotha KT, Preisinger C, et al. Polypropylene mesh implantation for hernia repair causes myeloid cell-driven persistent inflammation[J]. JCI Insight, 2019, 4(2):e123862.
[15]	顾榴俊. 聚四氟乙烯及其应用研究进展[J]. 浙江化工, 2020, 51(3):1-5.
[16]	张春泽, 付文政, 贾岩峰, 等. 应用膨化聚四氟乙烯补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝修补术的临床分析[J]. 腹部外科, 2015, 28(1):50-53.
[17]	Morales-Conde S, Gomez-Menchero J, Alarcon I, et al. Retroprosthetic seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is related to mesh used?[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(3):241-245. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0646 pmid: 31742465
[18]	陈志伟. 聚丁二酸丁二醇酯的合成及其应用研究进展[J]. 广东化工, 2018, 45(13):178-180.
[19]	Martin DP, Badhwar A, Shah DV, et al. Characterization of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh for hernia repair applications[J]. J Surg Res, 2013, 184(2):766-773. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.044 pmid: 23582230
[20]	Ruiz-Jasbon F, Norrby J, Ivarsson ML, et al. Inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh: results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(5):723-730. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1249-1 pmid: 24770701
[21]	Hufford T, Tremblay JF, Mustafa Sheikh MT, et al. Local parastomal hernia repair with biological mesh is safe and effective[J]. Am J Surg, 2018, 215(1):88-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.005 URL
[22]	唐健雄, 黄磊, 李绍杰. 生物材料在腹壁疝治疗中的现状和前景[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(7):720-724.
[23]	Miserez M, Lefering R, Famiglietti F, et al. Synthetic versus biological mesh in laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair (LAPSIS): results of a multinational, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 273(1):57-65. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004062 pmid: 33332873
[24]	Wen W, Majerus B, van De Moortel M, et al. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a composite mesh with polypropylene and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: a prospective, multicentre registry[J]. Acta Chir Belg, 2017, 117(5):295-302. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1313526 pmid: 28438090
[25]	Scheidbach H, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, et al. In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties du-ring endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs[J]. Surg Endosc, 2004, 18(2):211-220. pmid: 14691711
[26]	Yang S, Wu B, Wang Y, et al. Repair of a medium-sized ventral hernia with the UltraPro Hernia System[J]. Surg Today, 2021, 51(6):1068-1073. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02172-7 URL
[27]	Kockerling F, Schug-Pass C. What do we know about titanized polypropylene meshes? an evidence-based review of the literature[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(4):445-457. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1187-3 URL
[28]	Ott R, Hartwig T, Tannapfel A, et al. Biocompatibility of bacterial contaminated prosthetic meshes and porcine dermal collagen used to repair abdominal wall defects[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2007, 392(4):473-478. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0080-2 URL
[29]	Gordon AC, Gillespie C, Son J, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic large hiatus hernia repair with nonabsorbable mesh[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2018, 31(5).doi: 10.1093/dote/dox156. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox156