外科理论与实践 ›› 2022, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (04): 375-379.doi: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2022.04.021
收稿日期:
2022-02-23
出版日期:
2022-07-25
发布日期:
2022-09-20
通讯作者:
康杰
E-mail:kangjie007@163.com
Received:
2022-02-23
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-09-20
Contact:
KANG Jie
E-mail:kangjie007@163.com
摘要:
疝是普外科医师临床诊治的常见疾病之一,手术为主要治疗方式。开腹和腹腔镜无张力修补术需使用疝修补材料。疝修补材料根据材质不同分为不可吸收、可吸收人工合成补片以及生物补片和复合补片。此外,还有编织方式、孔径大小和密度的分类。本文综述不同材质分类补片的特点。展望疝修补材料未来,材料需具有最大化的生物惰性、最小化的总体面积、最优化的表面性质、最适宜的补片重量以及生物力学强度。在认识疝病理生理及补片材质特性的基础上作进一步的研究。
中图分类号:
于凡, 伍波, 康杰. 疝修补材料的研究进展及展望[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(04): 375-379.
YU Fan, WU Bo, KANG Jie. Study on hernia repair materials: progress and prospect[J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2022, 27(04): 375-379.
[1] | Disease GBD, Injury I, Prevalence C. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2018, 92(10159):1789-1858. |
[2] | HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1):1-165. |
[3] | 王芳. 生物补片材料在盆底功能重建中的应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2012, 16(25):4719-4726. |
[4] |
Romanowska M, Okninski T, Pawlak J. Modern materials applied in hernioplasty[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2016, 88(4):226-231.
doi: 10.1515/pjs-2016-0057 pmid: 27648626 |
[5] |
Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, et al. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias[J]. Arch Surg, 1998, 133(4):378-382.
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.4.378 URL |
[6] |
Stavert B, Chan DL, Ozmen J, et al. Laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal groin hernia repair with self-gripping polyester mesh: a series of 780 repairs[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2019, 89(10):1261-1264.
doi: 10.1111/ans.15378 URL |
[7] |
Cevasco M, Itani KM. Ventral hernia repair with synthe-tic, composite, and biologic mesh: characteristics, indications, and infection profile[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2012, 13(4):209-215.
doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.123 URL |
[8] |
O′Dwyer PJ, Chew C, Qandeel H. Long term outcome and elasticity of a polyester mesh used for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(2):489-493.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02486-6 URL |
[9] |
Serrano-Aroca A, Pous-Serrano S. Prosthetic meshes for hernia repair: state of art, classification, biomaterials, antimicrobial approaches, and fabrication methods[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2021, 109(12):2695-2719.
doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37238 pmid: 34021705 |
[10] |
Peeters E, Spiessens C, Oyen R, et al. Sperm motility after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with lightweight meshes: 3-year follow-up of a randomised clinical trial[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(3):361-367.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-1028-9 pmid: 23269401 |
[11] |
El-Komy H, El-Gendi A, Abdel-Salam W, et al. Self-fixing parietex progrip versus the standard sutured prolene mesh in tension-free repair of inguinal hernia: effect on testicular volume and testicular blood flow[J]. Updates Surg, 2018, 70(4):513-520.
doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0554-0 pmid: 29948662 |
[12] |
Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(2):289-321.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3917-8 pmid: 25398194 |
[13] |
Wolf MT, Carruthers CA, Dearth CL, et al. Polypropylene surgical mesh coated with extracellular matrix mitigates the host foreign body response[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2014, 102(1):234-246.
doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34671 URL |
[14] | Heymann F, von Trotha KT, Preisinger C, et al. Polypropylene mesh implantation for hernia repair causes myeloid cell-driven persistent inflammation[J]. JCI Insight, 2019, 4(2):e123862. |
[15] | 顾榴俊. 聚四氟乙烯及其应用研究进展[J]. 浙江化工, 2020, 51(3):1-5. |
[16] | 张春泽, 付文政, 贾岩峰, 等. 应用膨化聚四氟乙烯补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝修补术的临床分析[J]. 腹部外科, 2015, 28(1):50-53. |
[17] |
Morales-Conde S, Gomez-Menchero J, Alarcon I, et al. Retroprosthetic seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is related to mesh used?[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(3):241-245.
doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0646 pmid: 31742465 |
[18] | 陈志伟. 聚丁二酸丁二醇酯的合成及其应用研究进展[J]. 广东化工, 2018, 45(13):178-180. |
[19] |
Martin DP, Badhwar A, Shah DV, et al. Characterization of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh for hernia repair applications[J]. J Surg Res, 2013, 184(2):766-773.
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.044 pmid: 23582230 |
[20] |
Ruiz-Jasbon F, Norrby J, Ivarsson ML, et al. Inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh: results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(5):723-730.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1249-1 pmid: 24770701 |
[21] |
Hufford T, Tremblay JF, Mustafa Sheikh MT, et al. Local parastomal hernia repair with biological mesh is safe and effective[J]. Am J Surg, 2018, 215(1):88-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.005 URL |
[22] | 唐健雄, 黄磊, 李绍杰. 生物材料在腹壁疝治疗中的现状和前景[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(7):720-724. |
[23] |
Miserez M, Lefering R, Famiglietti F, et al. Synthetic versus biological mesh in laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair (LAPSIS): results of a multinational, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 273(1):57-65.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004062 pmid: 33332873 |
[24] |
Wen W, Majerus B, van De Moortel M, et al. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a composite mesh with polypropylene and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: a prospective, multicentre registry[J]. Acta Chir Belg, 2017, 117(5):295-302.
doi: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1313526 pmid: 28438090 |
[25] |
Scheidbach H, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, et al. In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties du-ring endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs[J]. Surg Endosc, 2004, 18(2):211-220.
pmid: 14691711 |
[26] |
Yang S, Wu B, Wang Y, et al. Repair of a medium-sized ventral hernia with the UltraPro Hernia System[J]. Surg Today, 2021, 51(6):1068-1073.
doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02172-7 URL |
[27] |
Kockerling F, Schug-Pass C. What do we know about titanized polypropylene meshes? an evidence-based review of the literature[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(4):445-457.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1187-3 URL |
[28] |
Ott R, Hartwig T, Tannapfel A, et al. Biocompatibility of bacterial contaminated prosthetic meshes and porcine dermal collagen used to repair abdominal wall defects[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2007, 392(4):473-478.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0080-2 URL |
[29] |
Gordon AC, Gillespie C, Son J, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic large hiatus hernia repair with nonabsorbable mesh[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2018, 31(5).doi: 10.1093/dote/dox156.
doi: 10.1093/dote/dox156 |
[1] | 杨良根, 朱俊强, 胡星辰. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗嵌顿性腹股沟疝[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(06): 551-554. |
[2] | 马丽英, 孙隆慈, 张斌, 吴志勇. 腹会阴联合切除术后腹膜内与腹膜外造口的比较和研究[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(06): 555-557. |
[3] | 于凡, 伍波, 康杰. 腹股沟疝Lichtenstein手术后的切口感染[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(04): 357-358. |
[4] | 姚君良, 俞建平, 姜笑明, 顾超, 孙荣勋. CT三维成像技术研究肌耻骨孔解剖[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(03): 249-252. |
[5] | 蒋维荣, 俞永江. 预防性应用抗生素对无张力疝修补术后疗效的荟萃分析[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022, 27(02): 173-179. |
[6] | 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 疝和腹壁外科20年发展的经验[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(05): 373-376. |
[7] | 李健文, 乐飞, 张云. 腹腔内和腹膜外微创技术治疗腹壁切口疝的思考[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(05): 377-382. |
[8] | 黄磊. Lichtenstein手术在当今腹股沟疝治疗中的地位和再认识[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(05): 386-389. |
[9] | 王平, 黄永刚. 腹腔镜疝与腹壁外科手术缝合技术与缝合材料选择中国专家共识(2021版)解读——切口疝修补[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(05): 390-393. |
[10] | 杨建军, 宋致成, 顾岩. 肥胖合并食管裂孔疝的外科治疗策略[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(05): 394-398. |
[11] | 胡志伟, 汪忠镐, 吴继敏. 胃食管反流病的外科手术治疗[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(05): 399-403. |
[12] | 杨媛媛, 黄鹤光. 机器人手术在造口旁疝修补手术中的应用价值[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(05): 404-406. |
[13] | 陈浩, 姚琪远. 造口旁疝的修补方式与预防[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(05): 407-410. |
[14] | 李航宇, 魏士博. 成人腹股沟疝质量控制——以辽宁省基层医院实践经验为例[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(05): 411-415. |
[15] | 李绍春, 李绍杰, 黄磊, 蔡昭, 孟云潇, 唐健雄. Halsted术式在急诊疝修补中的应用体会[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(05): 416-419. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||