组织工程与重建外科杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (6): 339-342.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0364.2014.06.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种细胞辅助脂肪移植隆乳的临床效果观察

王琳,陆毅,傅敏刚,何继银,黄一雄,范志宏   

  1. 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院整形外科
  • 发布日期:2020-07-23

Evaluation on Two Kinds of Cell-assisted Lipotransfer for Breast Augmentation

WANG Lin,LU Yi,FU Mingang,HE Jiyin,HUANG yixiong,FAN Zhihong   

  1. Department of Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine;
  • Published:2020-07-23

摘要: 目的观察两种细胞辅助脂肪移植技术(Cell-assisted lipotransfer,CAL)隆乳的临床疗效。方法 CAL技术隆胸30例,根据术中提取的基质血管成分细胞(Stromal vascular fraction,SVF)来源分为两组,来源于脂肪组织的称为固相组(S组,n=24),来源于吸脂液的为液相组(L组,n=6)。术后均随访12个月。流式细胞仪检测两种来源SVF中脂肪干细胞(Adipose-derived stem cells,ADSCs)比例,MRI检测术前及术后6、12个月的乳房体积,计算移植脂肪组织的吸收率。结果两组新鲜分离的SVF细胞群中,ADSCs平均比例分别为S组40.73%、L组3.75%。MRI测量及统计结果显示,S组术后6、12个月时乳房体积均明显大于术前(P0.05)。12个月时脂肪吸收率为(51.83±15.28)%,与6个月时相比无明显差异(P>0.05);L组12个月时脂肪吸收率为(75.47±12.20)%,与6个月时相比无明显差异(P>0.05);MRI影像见囊肿2例,均来自S组。结论脂肪组织相比吸脂液,其SVF细胞群中ADSCs含量明显更高;CAL辅助脂肪移植技术隆乳术安全有效,术后6个月乳房体积即可保持基本稳定。

关键词: 细胞辅助脂肪移植技术, 隆乳术, 乳房体积

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of two kinds of cell-assisted lipotransfer for breast augmentation. Methods Thirty patients accepted breast augmentation using cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL), and completed 12-month follow-up. According to the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) distilled from adipose tissue or aspirated liquid, the patients were divided into 2 groups:S group and L group. Flow-cytometry was used to detect the percentage of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) in distilled SVF. The breast volumes and images were evaluated by MRI pre-operative, 6 and 12 months post-operative. The data of breast volume were marked and the resorption rate of transplanted adipose tissue was calculated. Results Averagely, the percentage of ADSCs in freshly distilled SVF in S group is 40.73% and 3.75% in L group. MRI showed that the breast volume 6-month post-operative and 12-month post-operative were both larger than that of preoperative in S group (P〈0.05), while no significant difference between the breast volume 6-month post-operative and 12-month post-operative were observed (P〉0.05), neither the resorption rate of 6 and 12-month post-operative (P〉0.05), and the resorption rate of transplanted adipose tissue 12-month post-operative in S group was (51.83±15.28)%. However, there were no significant difference of breast volume among three time points in L group (P〉0.05), neither the resorption rate of 6 and 12-month post-operative (P〉0.05), and the resorption rate of transplanted adipose tissue 12-month post-operative in L group was (75.47±12.20)%. In addition, no calcification was seen in all MRI images but cysts were found in two cases of S group. Conclusion In process of breast augmentaion using cell-assissted lipotransfer, the distilled SVF from adipose tissue contains more ADSCs than that from aspirated liquid. The cell-assisted lipotransfer for breast augmentation is effective, safe, and the shrinkage stalls at 6-month post-operative.

Key words: Cell-assissted lipotransfer, Breast augmentation, Breast volume

中图分类号: