RT-SLA理论构建:语用视角下的二语习得研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以语用关联原则为肇端,关联理论在国内外语用学界乃至语言学界产生了深远影响。二语习得融合关联理论的语用取向和理论要点,拓宽了研究视野,为若干重要问题带来崭新的研究思路。本文在回顾关联理论框架下二语习得主流研究成果的基础上,从理论构建和研究方法两方面探讨RT-SLA对二语习得的解释力,论证该理论模式的优势,同时亦指出其存在的局限性,并从三方面提出修正的看法。文章最后对未来的研究走势加以展望。

关键词: 关联理论, 二语习得, 理论构建, 语用学

Abstract: Beginning with the pragmatic principle of relevance, Relevance Theory engenders a profound impact on the field of pragmatics and linguistics. SLA, integrating the pragmatic orientation and major theoretical points of Relevance Theory, brings about a new revelation to a number of important issues. Based on the reviews of the mainstream research in SLA within the theoretical framework of Relevance Theory, this paper probes into the explanatory power of RT-SLA from the aspects of theory construction and research methods, demonstrates its advantages and limitations, proposes amendments from three aspects, and puts forward the trend for future research.

中图分类号:

H319

于翠红. RT-SLA理论构建:语用视角下的二语习得研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(04): 21-26.

YU Cuihong. The Theory Construction of RT-SLA: Second Language Acquisition Study from the Pragmatic Perspective[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2013, 13(04): 21-26.

参考文献

Bromberek-Dyzman, K., K. Rataj & J. Dylak. 2010. Mentalizing in the second language: Is irony online inferencing any different in L1 and L2? [A]. In I. Witczak-Plisiecka (ed.). Pragmatic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics [C]. New Castle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 197-216.
Carston, R. 2008. Linguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinctions [J]. Synthèse 165: 321-45.
Carston, R. 2010. Lexical pragmatics, ad hoc concepts and metaphor: A Relevance Theory perspective [J]. Italian Journal of Linguistics 22: 153-80.
Cruz, P. M. 2008. Three different pragmatic approaches to the teaching of the (im)politeness of phatic utterances in English[A]. In C. Estébanez Estébanez & L. Pérez Ruiz (eds.). Language Awareness in English and Spanish [C]. Valladolid : University of Valladolid.131-52.
Cruz, P.M. 2010. Teaching interjections in the ESL/EFL class: A pragmatic approach [A]. In L. Pérez Ruiz, I. Parrado Román & P. Tabarés Pérez (eds.). Estudios de Metodología de la Lengua Inglesa [C]. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid. 23-33.
Davis, W. 2012. Meaning, impliciture, and linguistic variability [J]. Intercultural Pragmatics 2: 245-69.
de Paiva, B. 2007a. Integrating relevance: An evaluation of theoretical accounts for the acquisition of pragmatic abilities in a second language [A]. In B. Kraft & R. Geluykens (eds.). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics and Interlanguage English [C]. München: Lincom.
de Paiva, B. 2007b. New frameworks in interlanguage pragmatics? The case of requests in Brazilian Portuguese [R]. Paper delivered at The 10th International Pragmatics Conference. Göteborg.
Dippold, D. 2007. Applying relevance theory to explain pragmatic behaviour: A comparison of L2 German and NS German speakers’ performance [R]. Paper delivered at The 10th International Pragmatics Conference. Göteborg.
Ellis R.2008.The Study of Second Language Acquisition [M].Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Falkum, I. L. 2011. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polysemy: A Relevance-Theoretic Account [D]. London: UCL.
Foster-Cohen, S.H. 2000. Relevance theory in first and second language acquisition [R]. Paper presented at the AAAL Conference. Vancouver, CA.
Foster-Cohen, S. H. 2002. The relevance of Relevance Theory to first and second language acquisition [R]. In M. Makri Tsilipakou (ed.). Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics from the 14th International Symposium [C]. Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University. 9-23.
Foster-Cohen S. 2004. Relevance Theory, Action Theory and second language communication strategy [J]. Second Language Research (3): 289-302.
Foster-Cohen, S. H. & B. M. M. de Paiva. 2004. Exploring the relationships between theories of second language acquisition and Relevance Theory [J]. Second Language Research (3): 281-88.
Fu, L. & X. Han. 2009. A bridge between the listeners’ mental representations and the utterances [R]. Paper delivered at the 11th International Pragmatics Conference. Melbourne.
Gil, J. M. 2011. Relevance theory and unintended transmission of information [J]. Intercultural Pragmatics (1): 1-40.
Givón, T. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-typological Introduction [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hall, A. 2011. Relevance theory, semantic content and pragmatic enrichment [A]. In A. Capone, F. Lo Piparo & M. Carapezza (eds.). Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy [C]. Berlin: Springer.
Jodlowiec, M. 2010. The role of relevance theory in SLA studies [A]. In P. Martin & S. Laura (eds.). Cognitive Processing in Second Language Acquisition [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 49-66.
Katalin, N.C. 2009. Pragmatic and cognitive aspects of the research into grammaticalization [J]. Argumentum (5): 110-27.
Larsen-Freeman, D. C. 1997. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition [J]. Applied Linguistics (18): 141-63.
Liszka, S.A. 2004. Exploring the effects of first language influence on second language pragmatic processes from a syntactic deficit perspective [J]. Second Language Research (3): 212-31.
Ma, K. & Y. Liu. 2007. The role of non-verbal behavior in English class-viewed from the cognitive perspective based on the relevance theory [J]. Journal of Shandong Administration Institute & Shandong Economic Management Personnel Institute (3): 111-13.
Miskovic-Lukovic, M. 2003. Procedural encodings and SLA: The case of the English phrases kind/sort of and in fact [J]. South Asian Language Review (13): 82-99.
Nizegorodcew, A. 2004. L2 classroom discourse in the light of input theory and relevance theory [A]. In E. Mioduszewska (ed.). Relevance Studies in Poland [C]. Warszawa: Uniwesytet Warszawsk.
Nizegorodcew, A. 2007. Input for Instructed L2 Learners: The Relevance of Relevance [M]. London: Multilingual Matters.
Nunn, R. 2006. The pragmatics of cooperation and relevance for teaching and learning [J]. The Linguistics Journal (1): 5-16.
Olmos, S. 2012. Spanish pero ‘but’ as a marker of contrast and its relation with focalising particles [A]. In W. Ewa & P. Agnieszka (eds.). Relevance Theory: More than Understanding [C]. New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 93-114.
Owtram, N.T. 2012. Can relevance theory be applied in the writing classroom? Pedagogical perspectives on the case of ‘this’ plus summary noun [R]. Paper delivered at EPICS V. Plablo de Olavide UIniversity. Seville, Spain.
Sequeiros, R. X. 2004. Interpretation of reflexive anaphora in second language VP-ellipsis: Relevance Theory and paradigms of explanation [J]. Second Language Research (3): 256-80.
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition [M]. Oxford: Blackwell.
Taguchi, N. 2002. An application of relevance theory to the analysis of L2 interpretation processes: The comprehension of indirect replies[J]. IRAL 40: 151-76.
Taguchi, N. 2008. The effect of working memory, semantic access, and listening abilities on the comprehension of conversational implicatures in L2 English [J]. Pragmatics & Cognition (3): 517-39.
Toth, P. D. 2004. When grammar instruction undermines cohesion in L2 Spanish classroom discourse [J]. The Modern Language Journal (1): 14-30.
Wilson, D. 2003. Relevance and lexical pragmatics [J]. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista. Di Linguisitica, (2): 343-60.
Yates, R. & J. Kenkel. 2003. Responding to sentence-level errors in writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 11: 29-47.
Ying, H.G. 2004. Relevance mapping: A study of second language learners’ processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences in English [J]. Second Language Study (3): 232-55.
Ying, H.G. 2005. Second language learners’ interpretation of reflexive anaphora in VP-ellipsis: A relevance theory perspective [J]. Language Sciences (5): 551-70.
Zegarac, V. 2004. Relevance Theory and ‘the’ in second language acquisition [J]. Second Language Research (3): 193-211.
Zegarac, V. 2012. U-Pragmatics, I-Pragmatics and E-Pragmatics [R]. Paper Delivered at Meaning, Context and Cognition. University of Lodz, Poland.
何自然、冉永平.2001.导读[A].Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition [M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社.
蒋严.2008.关联理论的认知修辞学说[J].修辞学习(3):1-9.
孙继平.2008.关联在二语词汇学习中的效果研究[D].中国石油大学.
尹洪山.2009.关联理论视角下的二语习得研究[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)(3):50-52.
于翠红.2011.关联理论框架下的二语习得研究:回顾、思考与展望[J].解放军外国语学院学报(2):56-60.
于翠红、张拥政.2012.关联理论框架下的二语词汇习得——一项基于词汇语义认知的实证研究[J].现代外语(3):270-77.

[1]	戴运财. 中国的二语习得理论建设:引进与创新[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(04): 26-36.
[2]	徐晓东, 吴诗玉. 语用信息加工的神经机制[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(02): 31-43.
[3]	杨雅平. 日常语言哲学的浴火重生[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(01): 97-105.
[4]	陈卉. 存在极项词习得情况的实证研究——基于界面假说[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(02): 37-42.
[5]	张娜娜;. 工作记忆与二语习得研究——《第二语言习得和加工过程中的工作记忆》评介[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(06): 102-104+107.
[6]	王晓璐;杨连瑞;闫海娟;. 动态系统论视角下的二语学习定向动机流研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(04): 49-54+110.
[7]	方少华, 常辉. 儿童母语习得与成人二语习得是否存在本质差异？——以双宾句习得为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(03): 90-95.
[8]	申云化;马毅;. 《改进和拓展二语研究的定量推理》评介[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(06): 105-107.
[9]	孙强;Lawrence Jun Zhang;. 元认知与二语/外语教学——Lawrence Jun Zhang教授访谈录[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(03): 16-19+93.
[10]	. 第一届当代外语研究“二语习得行为及认知研究:方法、实验和思想”研讨会[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(03): 44-.
[11]	姚剑鹏;. 二语习得视阈下会话自我修补研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(02): 33-37+93.
[12]	. 第一届当代外语研究“二语习得行为及认知研究:方法、实验和思想”研讨会[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(02): 91-92.
[13]	常辉;徐俪珑;Cook,V.;D.Singleton;. 《二语习得中的重要话题》评介[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(11): 74-76.
[14]	王雪玉. 商业广告语篇中的身份建构变迁:历史社交语用学视角[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(09): 39-43.
[15]	范振强. 新认知语用学视域下同语的语境效果和生成动因[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(07): 12-16.