On Security Value of Language in Global Governance

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.02.002

Abstract

CLC Number:

SHEN Qi. On Security Value of Language in Global Governance[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2020, 20(2): 7-13.

References 24

[1]	Bauman, Z. 2006. Liquid Fear[M]. London: Polity.
[2]	Jernudd, B. H. & J. Rubin. 1971. Towards a theory of language planning[A]. In J. Rubin & B. H. Jernudd (eds.). Can Language Be Planned? [C]. Honolulu: The University of Hawaii Press. 195-215.
[3]	Müller, K.E. 1986. Language Competence: Implications for National Security[M]. New York: Praeger Publishers.
[4]	Ruiz, R. 1984. Orientations in language planning[J]. NABE Journal 8(2):15-34. doi: 10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464 URL
[5]	Ruiz, R. 2010. Reorienting language-as-resource [A]. In J. Petrovic (ed.). International Perspectives on Bilingual Education[C]. Charlotte, NC: Information Age. 155-172.
[6]	巴瑞·布赞、奥利·维夫、迪·怀尔德. 2003. 新安全论(朱宁译)[M]. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社.
[7]	戴曼纯. 2011. 国家语言能力、语言规划与国家安全[J]. 语言文字应用 (4):123-131.
[8]	戴曼纯. 2015. 语言与国家安全:以苏联语言政策为例[J]. 语言政策与规划研究 2(1):1-14, 85.
[9]	戴庆厦. 2010. 语言关系与国家安全[J]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 42(2):1-6.
[10]	董希骁. 2019. 从语言名称争议看中东欧语言民族主义新动向[J]. 国际论坛 21(1):143-154, 160.
[11]	范徵、范培华、贾思雪. 2018. 中国企业“走出去”跨文化环境因素探究[J]. 管理世界 34(7):178-179.
[12]	黄德宽. 2014. 国家安全视域下的语言文字工作[J]. 语言科学 13(1):10-14.
[13]	李艳红. 2015. 美国关键语言教育政策的国家安全诉求[J]. 语言政策与规划研究 2(2):1-10, 79.
[14]	李宇明. 2019. 语言学的问题意识、话语转向及学科问题[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版) 18(5):96-105.
[15]	刘永涛. 2014. 话语政治: 符号权力和美国对外政策[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社.
[16]	刘跃进. 2011. 国家安全体系中的语言文字问题[J]. 语言教学与研究 (6):38-43.
[17]	乔书亚·费什曼[美]. 1971. 语言社会学(黄希敏译)[M]. 台北: 巨流图书公司.
[18]	沈骑. 2014. 非传统安全领域的语言规划研究:问题与框架[J]. 语言教学与研究 (5):103-112.
[19]	沈骑. 2016. “一带一路”建设中的语言安全战略[J]. 语言战略研究 1(2):20-25.
[20]	盛静. 2017. 国家安全视域下的语言科技:应用与展望[J]. 语言政策与规划研究(2): 85-92, 120.
[21]	王建勤. 2011. 语言问题安全化与国家安全对策研究[J]. 语言教学与研究 (6):31-37.
[22]	余潇枫、潘一禾、王江丽. 2006. 非传统安全概论[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社.
[23]	张日培. 2018. 国家安全语言规划:总体国家安全观下的范式建构[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 39(6):33-44.
[24]	赵世举. 2019. 语言在国家安全中的角色和功能[J]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 51(2):31-39.

On Security Value of Language in Global Governance

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 24

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	JIANG Feng. The Dual Capabilities and Triple Foundations in the Professional and Discipline Development of Area Studies [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 12-16,21.
[2]	YANG Zhenyuan. From Footnoting to Being Footnoted: On the Luian Mindological Awareness of Benxin for Outward Translation of Chinese Literature [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 126-132.
[3]	TIAN Lu, LIU Zequan. Knowledge Recognition and Multimodal Narration in the Translation of Children’s Popular Science Picturebooks: A Case Study of The Magic School Bus [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 140-147.
[4]	HUANG Youyi. Heralding a New Phase in T&I Education [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 17-21.
[5]	MU Lei, LIU Xinyuan. Analyzing Doctor of Translation and Interpreting in the Context of Transformation of Knowledge Production Mode [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 22-29.
[6]	HUANG Qin, WANG Yajun. On the Translation of Peking Opera as Local Knowledge and its Global Paths [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 37-45.
[7]	LIU Xiaoyu. On Emergency Language Comforting [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 110-119.
[8]	LI Hongru. Rationality and Frontier of Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics from the Perspective of History of Philosophy: The Philosophical Foundation of Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics II [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 40-48.
[9]	LIN Keqin. “Face Score”: Its Route of Birth, Meaning of Development and Argument of Embodiment-Cognition from the Perspective of Linguistic Phenomenon [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 49-57.
[10]	QUAN Lihong, MA Jinlong. Two Question Formats in Mandarin Chinese Conversation: An Epistemic Approach [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 58-69.
[11]	ZHOU Haiming. Theoretical Interpretation of Ontogenesis in SFL: Connotation, Origins and Implications [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 70-79.
[12]	LIN Yi. Language and Its Crisis in the Post-Truth Era [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 80-87.
[13]	HA Changchen, HUANG Guowen. New Thought of Ecolinguistics and Its Implications to Ecological Discourse Analysis [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 88-96.
[14]	WANG Yu, DU Shihong. A Reductive Analysis of Conceptual Metaphor from the Perspective of Philosophy of Dialogue [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 97-109.
[15]	WU Jianguo, XIE Sisi, LI Jing. Investigating Legitimization in Political Discourse from the Perspective of CMA:An Analysis of the US Governmental Discourse on China-US Trade Talks [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 460(4): 111-122.