Analyzing Doctor of Translation and Interpreting in the Context of Transformation of Knowledge Production Mode

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.06.004

Abstract

Abstract:

The establishment of Doctor of Translation and Interpreting (DTI) from conception to reality requires scholars of Translation Studies (TS) to seriously consider fundamental questions. The ten-year argumentation and survey on the professional degree of DTI have reflected the needs of the transformation of the knowledge production model for TS as a discipline. It is necessary to compare the educational philosophy between DTI and PhD of TS in terms of student selection, curriculum, education quality assessment system, and talent management and employment, with a closing discussion on the faculty development for different degrees in TS.

Key words: Doctor of Translation and Interpreting, knowledge production mode, faculty

CLC Number:

H059

MU Lei, LIU Xinyuan. Analyzing Doctor of Translation and Interpreting in the Context of Transformation of Knowledge Production Mode[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 22-29.

Figures/Tables 1

References 10

[1]	Gibbons M., , C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott & M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies[M]. London: SAGE.
[2]	Orlando M. 2019. Training and educating interpreter and translator trainers as practitioners-researchers-teachers[J]. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 13(3):216-232. doi: 10.1080/1750399X.2019.1656407 URL
[3]	黄友义、王少爽. 2022. 新文科背景下我国翻译学科与国际传播能力建设——黄友义先生访谈录[J]. 语言教育(3): 3-21.
[4]	李燕. 2015. 我国科技创新领军人才的过去、现在与未来[J]. 中国人力资源开发 21: 65-71,91.
[5]	穆雷. 2021. 翻译博士专业学位设置的相关问题再探[J]. 英语研究(1): 21-31.
[6]	穆雷, 等. 2021. 翻译学研究的方法与途径[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
[7]	王立非. 2021. 序[A]. 崔启亮. 京津冀协同发展语言服务调查报告[R]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学出版社.
[8]	王晓玲、张德祥. 2020. 试论学科知识生产的三种模式[J]. 复旦教育论坛 18(2): 12-17.
[9]	朱华伟. 2022. 知识生产模式转型背景下跨学科研究生培养探究[J]. 高等工程教育研究 (5): 170-176.
[10]	祝爱武. 2020. 知识生产模式转型背景下博士生培养质量评价[J]. 研究生教育研究 (1): 74-79,97.

类型	特征	解决的问题类型
模式Ⅰ	拓展和创新本学科的理论体系,并从原有学科细分出新的研究对象、研究方法,重新构建分支学科理论体系,创建新学科。	学科内部系统和社会发展的基础理论问题
模式Ⅱ	借鉴其他学科理论体系和研究方法实现本学科的知识生产和创新,或者通过其他学科的视角来研究本学科问题,以及通过不同学科之间充分的交叉融合,构建新的交叉性学科理论体系。	复杂理论或实践问题
模式Ⅲ	站在经济社会发展的整体高度,通过对学科知识与社会实践、个体认知实践的整合,构建集政府、产业、大学与社会公众于一体的创新生态系统,对知识进行全面整合和再创新。	重大而复杂的经济社会实践问题

[1]	YANG Zhenyuan. From Footnoting to Being Footnoted: On the Luian Mindological Awareness of Benxin for Outward Translation of Chinese Literature [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 126-132.
[2]	TIAN Lu, LIU Zequan. Knowledge Recognition and Multimodal Narration in the Translation of Children’s Popular Science Picturebooks: A Case Study of The Magic School Bus [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 140-147.
[3]	HUANG Youyi. Heralding a New Phase in T&I Education [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 17-21.
[4]	HUANG Qin, WANG Yajun. On the Translation of Peking Opera as Local Knowledge and its Global Paths [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 37-45.
[5]	WANG Hongtao. Exploring the Translation and Transmission of the Classical Chinese Literary Theories in the Western Anglophone World: A Survey Based on the Questionnaires Conducted in the UK, USA and Australia [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(4): 33-45.
[6]	LVU Hui, CHEN Daliang. Development of a Translation Horizon Assessment Model for Classical Chinese Poetry [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(4): 77-86.
[7]	FENG Zhiwei, DING Xiaomei. Neural Network Models in Natural Language Processing [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(4): 98-110.
[8]	MENG Xiangchun. Transknowletology: Its Naming and Concept Construction, [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(3): 55-64.
[9]	YUE Feng, CHEN Zeyu. On Translating zhishi fanyixue into Metatranslatology in the Light of its Principle of Real Meanings, Full Preparations and TT Aesthetic Conceptions [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(3): 65-73.
[10]	ZHOU Hongmin. An Incongruity Theory-based Approach to Interpreting and Translating Literary Humor: A Case Study of The Republic of Wine [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(2): 148-155.
[11]	DING Jianxin, ZHAO Yi. The Desire for Discourse: Perspectives on Richthofen’s “Seidenst Rossen” [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(2): 156-160.
[12]	FENG Quangong. The Overall Approach to Studying Translator Groups:A Review of A Study on English Translators of Jiangsu Classic Literature [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(1): 153-160.
[13]	QIN Jianghua. Translation as Knowledge Production, Management, and Utilization: Towards Transknowletology [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(1): 60-71.
[14]	PANG Xiucheng. Transknowletology: the Translator’s Personal Knowledge and Knowing Modal [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(1): 72-82.
[15]	WEN Yixin. Foreignization Strategy in the Chinese Translation of English Literary Neologisms: The Case of The Lord of the Rings [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 21(6): 144-153.