Academic Discourse Acts of Sentences Stems

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.02.011

Abstract

CLC Number:

LI Jingjie, LI Chenyang. Academic Discourse Acts of Sentences Stems[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2020, 20(2): 84-95.

Figures/Tables 7

话语行为	短语型式	类符数	形符数	词汇多样性
语篇导向话语行为:		1617	18420	14.23
1.陈述观点/数据/事实	(1) (DET) DATA V/V-Link (that) (2) It/This (Modal) V/V-link (that/to-inf/prep) (3) There V-link N (that/to-inf/prep)	388	4815	10.31
2.阐述方法/步骤/技术	(1) (DET) N V-Link V-ed (2) We (MODAL) V (3) This (MODAL) V-Link V-ed	388	3376	10.54
3.呈述发现/结果	(1) (Det) N (V-Link) V (that) (2) It (V-Link) found (that) (3) We (MODAL) V/V-ed (that)	161	2184	8.06
4.篇章指示	(1) As (MODAL) V-ed (AC) (2) (DET) N (MODAL) V-Link V-ed (prep)	107	2122	7.49
5.援引	(1) It (MODAL) V-Link V-ed/Adj (prep/that) (2) As V-ed prep (3) N (MODAL) V-ed/V that	104	1352	7.69
6.描述研究目的	(1) OBJECTIVE (of this STUDY) V-Link prep (2) We (MODAL) V (prep) (3) It (MODAL) V-Link V-ed/V (that)	64	623	6.8
7.宣布研究特征	(1) N (V-Link) V-ed/V (prep) (2) We (MODAL) V/V-ed (prep)	86	617	7.87
8.软化态度,谨慎表述观点	(1) We (Modal) V (that) (2) It (MODAL) V-Link V-ed (that)	31	469	6.09
9.阐明观点	(1) We (MODAL) V-ed/V (that)	36	425	6.72
10.揭示学科不足,阐述研究必要性	(1) N MODAL/V-link V/V-ed/Adj (prep/that) (2) There (MODAL) V-link (DET) N	45	379	7.28
11.总结	(1) We/N MODAL (V-Link) V-ed/V (that)	39	344	7
12.聚焦	(1) We/N (MODAL) V-ed/V prep (2) N V-Link prep/that/how/whether/why	32	322	6.48
话语行为	短语型式	类符数	形符数	词汇多样性
13.比较	(1) As V-ed prep (2) N MODAL/V-Link V-ed/V/Adj (prep) (3) This V-Link Adj prep	16	317	6.02
14.阐明原因	(1) This (MODAL) V-Link V-ed/Adj (prep) (2) N V-Link that	26	232	6.23
15.举例	(1) As (MODAL) V-Link/V-ed N/Adj (prep) (2) This V-Link N (prep)	14	159	5.31
16.展示研究贡献与意义	(1) N/We (MODAL) V/V-ed (prep/that)	20	140	6.25
17.共享知识理论	(1) (As) We (MODAL) V/V-ed	10	137	4.86
18.描述人类普遍行为	(1) ONE MODAL V (that)	9	100	4.5
19.提出质疑	(1) It V-Link Adj that/whether/if/how (2) This V-link/V N	10	92	5.5
20.语篇结构标识	(1) (DET) PAPER V-Link V-ed (prep N)/(prep)	5	68	4.03
21.解释数据	(1) DATA (MODAL) V-Link Adj/V-ed	6	46	4.17
22.分类	(1) There V-Link DET Adj (N)	7	30	4.17
23.推理	(1) We (MODAL) V (that)	5	30	4
24.界定	(1) We (MODAL) V (2) N/This V-Link V-ed (prep)	4	22	4.21
25.数据来源	(1) N V-Link V-ed prep (2) We V-ed N prep	4	19	4.04
参与者导向话语行为:		205	3375	9.44
1.确定性/可能性标识	(1) It (MODAL) V-Link Adj (that/to) (2) There V-link N (that)	84	1532	7.24
2.评判/态度标识	(1) It/This (MODAL) V-Link Adj (that/to)	50	584	6.86
3.重要性/必要性标识	(1) It be ADV Adj (that/to)	29	575	5.87
4.提醒标识	(1) It (MODAL) V-Link V-ed/Adj (to/that)	21	439	5.78
话语行为	短语型式	类符数	形符数	词汇多样性
5.意图/能力标识	(1) We V/V-ed (prep) (2) We V-Link Adj prep	12	130	5.60
6.引导读者	(1) We (MODAL) V (prep)	9	115	5.04

References 19

[1]	Biber, D., S. Conrad & V. Cortes. 2004. If you look at..: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks[J]. Applied Linguistics 25(3):371-405. doi: 10.1093/applin/25.3.371 URL
[2]	Firth, J. R. 1957. Papers in Linguistics 1934-51 [M]. London: Oxford University Press.
[3]	Flowerdew, J. & Y. Li. 2007. Language re-use among Chinese apprentice scientists writing for publication[J]. Applied Linguistics 28/3:440-465.
[4]	Granger, S. & M. Paquot. 2008. Disentangling the phraseological web [A]. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (eds.). Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective[C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 27-49.
[5]	Hammond, K. 2017. “I need it now!” Developing a formulaic frame phrasebank for a specific writing assessment: Student perceptions and recommendations[J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Available online 15 December 2017):1-8.
[6]	Hyland, K. 2002. Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 34:1091-1112. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8 URL
[7]	Hyland, K. 2008. A convincing argument: Corpus analysis and academic persuasion [A]. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (eds.). Discourse in the Professions: Perspective from Corpus Linguistics[C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 87-114.
[8]	Malvern, D. & B. Richards. 2002. Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity[J]. Language Testing 19(1):85-104. doi: 10.1191/0265532202lt221oa URL
[9]	Pawley, A. & H. Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency [A]. In J. C. Richard & R.W. Schmidt (eds.). Language and Communication[C]. New York: Longman. 191-225.
[10]	Tweedie, F.J. & R. H. Baayen. 1998. How variable may a constant be? Measures of lexical richness in perspective[J]. Computers and the Humanities 32(5):323-352. doi: 10.1023/A:1001749303137 URL
[11]	蒋婷. 2006. 论学术英语中的情态模糊限制语——一项基于语料库的研究[J]. 外语电化教学 (4):47-51.
[12]	李晶洁、侯绘丽. 2018. 硬科学论文中we的语义指向及话语行为研究[J]. 外国语 41(2):42-53.
[13]	李晶洁、卫乃兴. 2017. 学术英语文本中的功能句干研究:其提取方法与频数分布[J]. 外语教学与研究 49(2):202-214.
[14]	李晶洁、卫乃兴. 2013. 学术文本中短语序列的语篇行为[J]. 外语教学与研究 45(2):200-213.
[15]	李晶洁、周昕玥. 2018. 学术语篇“功能句干”的引导元话语特征分析[J]. 外语教学理论与实践 1:64-73.
[16]	卫乃兴. 2011. 词语学要义[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
[17]	张弘、刘俊. 2018. 基于语料库的变动型模糊限制语研究[J]. 文化创新比较研究 36(2):84-85.
[18]	张乐、李晶洁. 2012. 学术语篇中的篇章性句干:型式、功能及双语对等[J]. 山东外语教学 33(6):45-51.
[19]	张庆华. 2012. 确定性与可能性:中国学生口笔语中两类副词人际元话语使用研究[J]. 当代外语研究(5):32-37.

参数项	统计数据	参数项	统计数据
社会科学领域	15	类符/形符比(TTR)	1.67
自然科学领域	10	标准化类符/形符比	35.75
文本数	766	平均词长	5.07
形符数	4478339	句子总数	205041
类符数	71188	平均句长	20.74

序号	句干	频数	New-MI值
1.	data were collected	53	7.7043
2.	tests were conducted	48	10.2807
3.	we begin by	32	6.5633
4.	we will use	34	8.2380
5.	we denote by	25	6.3276
6.	the solvent was removed under	21	3.9139
7.	as measured by	80	7.0635
8.	tests were performed	28	9.3506
9.	spectra were recorded	29	10.7313
10.	experiments were performed	26	8.9488

序号	句干	频数	New-MI值
1.	we note that	116	6.1411
2.	we show that	54	5.3441
3.	it was found that	72	6.8271
4.	this results in	36	5.4676
5.	we found that	93	5.6677
6.	these results suggest that	49	6.6903
7.	our results demonstrate that	35	7.0967
8.	results indicate that	88	6.7129
9.	these findings suggest that	33	6.8198
10.	this finding is consistent with	29	7.3611

序号	句干	频数	New-MI值
1.	it is possible (that / to)	386	6.2167
2.	it is apparent that	37	6.7730
3.	it would appear	49	6.6479
4.	it is clear that	199	6.6091
5.	it is likely that	99	6.5279
6.	it seems that	98	4.3952
7.	it is evident that	37	6.4840
8.	there is no doubt (that)	29	8.5579
9.	there is a possibility (that)	12	6.9191
10.	there is no reason to	21	8.7814

1.	of U.S education,	it is likely that	further ESL instruction will have dim
2.	this context,	it is likely that	housing conditions can have a strong
3.	the years ahead,	it is likely that	mechanics research will also play a central
4.	requirements,	it is likely that	professionals would most probably choose to
5.	are @t possible.	it is likely that	in the future the technique may complement

Academic Discourse Acts of Sentences Stems

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 19

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

序号	句干	频数	New-MI值
1.	it is especially important	12	6.9107
2.	it is not necessary (to)	28	6.7795
3.	it is desirable (to/ that)	37	6.1076
4.	it is important (to/ that)	420	5.8493
5.	it is better to	27	5.3741
6.	it is useful to	39	5.3515
7.	it is best to	22	5.1295
8.	it is reasonable to	38	6.3212
9.	it is crucial to	15	4.5538
10.	it is necessary to	217	4.0811

[1]	JIANG Feng. The Dual Capabilities and Triple Foundations in the Professional and Discipline Development of Area Studies [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 12-16,21.
[2]	YANG Zhenyuan. From Footnoting to Being Footnoted: On the Luian Mindological Awareness of Benxin for Outward Translation of Chinese Literature [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 126-132.
[3]	TIAN Lu, LIU Zequan. Knowledge Recognition and Multimodal Narration in the Translation of Children’s Popular Science Picturebooks: A Case Study of The Magic School Bus [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 140-147.
[4]	HUANG Youyi. Heralding a New Phase in T&I Education [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 17-21.
[5]	MU Lei, LIU Xinyuan. Analyzing Doctor of Translation and Interpreting in the Context of Transformation of Knowledge Production Mode [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 22-29.
[6]	HUANG Qin, WANG Yajun. On the Translation of Peking Opera as Local Knowledge and its Global Paths [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 37-45.
[7]	LIU Xiaoyu. On Emergency Language Comforting [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 110-119.
[8]	LI Hongru. Rationality and Frontier of Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics from the Perspective of History of Philosophy: The Philosophical Foundation of Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics II [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 40-48.
[9]	LIN Keqin. “Face Score”: Its Route of Birth, Meaning of Development and Argument of Embodiment-Cognition from the Perspective of Linguistic Phenomenon [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 49-57.
[10]	QUAN Lihong, MA Jinlong. Two Question Formats in Mandarin Chinese Conversation: An Epistemic Approach [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 58-69.
[11]	ZHOU Haiming. Theoretical Interpretation of Ontogenesis in SFL: Connotation, Origins and Implications [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 70-79.
[12]	LIN Yi. Language and Its Crisis in the Post-Truth Era [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 80-87.
[13]	HA Changchen, HUANG Guowen. New Thought of Ecolinguistics and Its Implications to Ecological Discourse Analysis [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 88-96.
[14]	WANG Yu, DU Shihong. A Reductive Analysis of Conceptual Metaphor from the Perspective of Philosophy of Dialogue [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 97-109.
[15]	WU Jianguo, XIE Sisi, LI Jing. Investigating Legitimization in Political Discourse from the Perspective of CMA:An Analysis of the US Governmental Discourse on China-US Trade Talks [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 460(4): 111-122.