Exemplars and Paradigms in Linguistic Research

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.03.003

Abstract

CLC Number:

DU Shihong. Exemplars and Paradigms in Linguistic Research[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2020, 20(3): 26-38.

Figures/Tables 3

References 34

[1]	Adamson, S. & W. Ayres-Bennett. 2011. Linguistics and philology in the twenty-first century: An introduction[J]. Transactions of the Philological Society(3): 201-206.
[2]	Agassi, J. & I. Jarvie. 2008. A Critical Rationalist Aesthetics[M]. Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V.
[3]	Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures[M]. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
[4]	Davies, A. M. 2011. Philology and linguistics: When data meet theory[J]. Transactions of the Philological Society (3): 207-219.
[5]	Feyerabend, P.K. 1962. Explanation, reduction, and empiricism[A]. In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (eds.). Scientific Explanation. Space and Time[C]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.28-97.
[6]	Greenberg, J. H. 1973. Linguistics as a pilot science [A]. In E. P. Hamp (ed.). Themes in Linguistics: The 1970s [C]. The Hague: Mouton. 44-60.
[7]	Juniper, T. 2019. The Ecology Book[M]. Berlin: Dorling Kindersley, DK.
[8]	Klemke, E. D. 1980. Introduction[A]. In E. D. Klemke (ed.). Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science[C]. New York: Prometheus Books. 11-18.
[9]	Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[10]	Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions(2^nd edn.)[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[11]	Kuhn, T. S. 1982. Commensurability, comparability, communicability[R]. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers: 669-688.
[12]	Pearce, D. 1987. Roads to Commensurability[M]. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
[13]	Popper, K. 1980. Science: Conjectures and refutations[A]. In E. D. Klemke (ed.). Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science[C]. New York: Prometheus Books. 19-34.
[14]	Stein, G. 2008. Gertrude Stein: Selections[M]. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
[15]	Wittgenstein, L. 2018. Remarks on Frazer’s The Golden Bough[A]. In G. da Col & S. Palmié (eds.). The Mythology in Our Language[C]. Chicago: Hau Books. 29-76.
[16]	Ziman, J. 1980. What is science?[A]. In E. D. Klemke (ed.). Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science[C]. New York: Prometheus Books.35-54.
[17]	毕沅. 1995. 墨子(毕沅校注.吴旭民标点)[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社.
[18]	杜世洪. 2012. 脉络与连贯--话语理解的语言哲学研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社.
[19]	杜世洪. 2014. 语言研究的智慧与方法--钱冠连的哲学思想与“钱冠连的绳子”[J]. 当代外语研究(6):21-27.
[20]	杜世洪. 2018. 新描写主义与假装的高阶描写[J]. 当代语言学(4):537-551.
[21]	杜世洪. 2020a. 语言学是什么样的好箭?[J]. 当代外语研究(1):36-43.
[22]	杜世洪. 2020b. 语言学研究中的蚂蚁和蜘蛛[J]. 当代外语研究(2):14-22, 38.
[23]	冯友兰. 2017. 我的读书经验[N]. 甘肃日报(10-12):16.
[24]	刘探宙. 2018. 说“王冕死了父亲”句[M]. 上海: 学林出版社.
[25]	潘文国. 1997. 汉英对比纲要[M]. 北京: 北京语言文大学出版社.
[26]	乔清举. 2000. 《盐铁论》注释本[M]. 北京: 华夏出版社.
[27]	濮之珍. 2002. 中国语言学史[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社.
[28]	王力. 2006. 中国语言学史[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社.
[29]	伍铁平. 1991. 三论语言学是一门领先的科学[J]. 语言教学与研究(3):115-130.
[30]	许建峰. 2016. 汉语的魅力--趣味阅读[M]. 西安: 西北大学出版社.
[31]	杨炳钧. 2018. “王冕死了父亲”的概念语法隐喻视角[J]. 浙江外国语学院学报(5):96-104.
[32]	游光中. 2018. 历代散文名句鉴赏[M]. 成都: 四川辞书出版社.
[33]	赵金科. 2018. 中国文化建构和精神自觉的历史回顾与现代反思[M]. 北京: 光明日报出版社.
[34]	庄会彬. 2013. 新中国成立以来“王冕死了父亲”句式的研究及其启示[J]. 浙江外国语学院学报(1):20-27.

项目	实践范例	价值标准	理论概括	形上内容	贡献量描述
A	0	0	0	0	零理论贡献
B	1	0	0	0	有基本贡献
C	1	1	0	0	有显著贡献
D	1	1	1	0	有重大贡献
E	1	1	1	1	革命性贡献
备注	表中“0”表示无修正或改变;“1”表示有修正或改变。

Exemplars and Paradigms in Linguistic Research

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 34

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	JIANG Feng. The Dual Capabilities and Triple Foundations in the Professional and Discipline Development of Area Studies [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 12-16,21.
[2]	YANG Zhenyuan. From Footnoting to Being Footnoted: On the Luian Mindological Awareness of Benxin for Outward Translation of Chinese Literature [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 126-132.
[3]	TIAN Lu, LIU Zequan. Knowledge Recognition and Multimodal Narration in the Translation of Children’s Popular Science Picturebooks: A Case Study of The Magic School Bus [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 140-147.
[4]	HUANG Youyi. Heralding a New Phase in T&I Education [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 17-21.
[5]	MU Lei, LIU Xinyuan. Analyzing Doctor of Translation and Interpreting in the Context of Transformation of Knowledge Production Mode [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 22-29.
[6]	HUANG Qin, WANG Yajun. On the Translation of Peking Opera as Local Knowledge and its Global Paths [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 37-45.
[7]	LIU Xiaoyu. On Emergency Language Comforting [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 110-119.
[8]	LI Hongru. Rationality and Frontier of Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics from the Perspective of History of Philosophy: The Philosophical Foundation of Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics II [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 40-48.
[9]	LIN Keqin. “Face Score”: Its Route of Birth, Meaning of Development and Argument of Embodiment-Cognition from the Perspective of Linguistic Phenomenon [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 49-57.
[10]	QUAN Lihong, MA Jinlong. Two Question Formats in Mandarin Chinese Conversation: An Epistemic Approach [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 58-69.
[11]	ZHOU Haiming. Theoretical Interpretation of Ontogenesis in SFL: Connotation, Origins and Implications [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 70-79.
[12]	LIN Yi. Language and Its Crisis in the Post-Truth Era [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 80-87.
[13]	HA Changchen, HUANG Guowen. New Thought of Ecolinguistics and Its Implications to Ecological Discourse Analysis [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 88-96.
[14]	WANG Yu, DU Shihong. A Reductive Analysis of Conceptual Metaphor from the Perspective of Philosophy of Dialogue [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 97-109.
[15]	WU Jianguo, XIE Sisi, LI Jing. Investigating Legitimization in Political Discourse from the Perspective of CMA:An Analysis of the US Governmental Discourse on China-US Trade Talks [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 460(4): 111-122.