What Is Characterized by “Ba Ge Qingwen Jiejie Ye Mei Le”?

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.03.009

Abstract

CLC Number:

ZHONG Shuneng, WU Zijing. What Is Characterized by “Ba Ge Qingwen Jiejie Ye Mei Le”?[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2020, 20(3): 83-92.

References 33

[1]	Audring, J. & G. Booij. 2016. Cooperation and coercion[J]. Linguistics (4): 617-637.
[2]	Croft, W. & A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3]	De Swart, H. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion[J]. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (2): 347-385.
[4]	Ghaderi, S. & A. Rafiei. 2018. Coercion and construction grammar[J]. Language Related Research(8): 183-208.
[5]	Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure[M]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[6]	Goldberg, A. 2006. Construction at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[7]	Kuno, S. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy[M]. Chicago,IL: The University of Chicago Press.
[8]	Michaelis, L. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion[J]. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 1-67. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2004.001 URL
[9]	Michaelis, L. 2011. Stative by construction[J]. Linguistics 49: 1359-1400.
[10]	Panther, K. & L. Thornburg. 2009. Introduction: On figuration in grammar [A]. In K. Panther, L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona (eds.). Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar[C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
[11]	Sun, Y. 2018. A cartographic analysis of the syntactic structure of Mandarin Ba[J]. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 39:127-154 doi: 10.2478/scl-2018-0005 URL
[12]	Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization pattern: Semantic structure in lexical forms [A]. In T. Shopen (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description Language Typology and Syntactic Description[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.57-149.
[13]	Taylor, J. R. 2002. Cognitive Grammar[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[14]	Taylor, Feng-fu . 1987. A topic-comment approach to the construction[J]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics (1): 1-54.
[15]	Yang, B.(ed.). 2018. “Zuì(the most)+Noun” Structure from the Perspective of Construction Grammar[C]. 19th Workshop, CLSW 2018, Chiayi, Taiwan, May 26-28, 2018, Revised Selected Papers.
[16]	丁声树. 1962. 现代汉语语法讲话[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆.
[17]	黑格尔. 1961. 法哲学原理[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆.
[18]	杉村博文. 1999. “把个老汉感动得……”について[A]. 现代中国语研究论集[C]. 北京:中国书店.
[19]	杉村博文. 2002. 论现代汉语“把”字句“把”的宾语带量词“个”[J]. 世界汉语教学 (1): 18-27,114.
[20]	沈家煊. 2002. 如何处置“处置式”?--论把字句的主观性[J]. 中国语文 (5): 387-399.
[21]	石毓智. 2015. 汉语语法演化史[M]. 南昌: 江西教育出版社.
[22]	宋作艳. 2018. 压制现象研究: 关键问题与最新趋势[J]. 语言研究集刊(3): 112-130,375-376.
[23]	陶红印、张伯江. 2000. 无定式把字句在近、现代汉语中的地位问题及其理论意义[J]. 中国语文 (5): 433-446,479-480.
[24]	王惠. 1997. 从及物性系统看现代汉语的句式[A]. 《语言学论从》第十九辑[C]. 北京: 商务印书馆.193-252.
[25]	王力. 1943. 中国现代语法[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆.
[26]	吴葆棠. 1987. 句型和动词[M]. 北京: 语文出版社.
[27]	游汝杰. 1983. 补语的标志“个”和“得”[J]. 汉语学习 (3):18-19,49.
[28]	袁野. 2011. 论语篇构式语法及语篇构式压制[J]. 外国语 (5): 38-45.
[29]	袁野. 2017. 构式语法的理论、流派和应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
[30]	张谊生. 2003. 从量词到助词-量词“个”语法化过程的个案分析[J]. 当代语言学 (5): 193-205,285.
[31]	钟书能、杨康. 2019. 中华文化典籍中话题压制翻译技巧研究--中华文化典籍英译探微之七[J]. 中国翻译 (2):157-164.
[32]	朱德熙. 1982. 《中国语法丛书》序[J]. 语言教学与研究 (4): 4-6.
[33]	朱德熙. 1984. 语法讲义[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆.

What Is Characterized by “Ba Ge Qingwen Jiejie Ye Mei Le”?

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 33

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	JIANG Feng. The Dual Capabilities and Triple Foundations in the Professional and Discipline Development of Area Studies [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 12-16,21.
[2]	YANG Zhenyuan. From Footnoting to Being Footnoted: On the Luian Mindological Awareness of Benxin for Outward Translation of Chinese Literature [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 126-132.
[3]	TIAN Lu, LIU Zequan. Knowledge Recognition and Multimodal Narration in the Translation of Children’s Popular Science Picturebooks: A Case Study of The Magic School Bus [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 140-147.
[4]	HUANG Youyi. Heralding a New Phase in T&I Education [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 17-21.
[5]	MU Lei, LIU Xinyuan. Analyzing Doctor of Translation and Interpreting in the Context of Transformation of Knowledge Production Mode [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 22-29.
[6]	HUANG Qin, WANG Yajun. On the Translation of Peking Opera as Local Knowledge and its Global Paths [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 37-45.
[7]	LIU Xiaoyu. On Emergency Language Comforting [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 110-119.
[8]	LI Hongru. Rationality and Frontier of Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics from the Perspective of History of Philosophy: The Philosophical Foundation of Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics II [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 40-48.
[9]	LIN Keqin. “Face Score”: Its Route of Birth, Meaning of Development and Argument of Embodiment-Cognition from the Perspective of Linguistic Phenomenon [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 49-57.
[10]	QUAN Lihong, MA Jinlong. Two Question Formats in Mandarin Chinese Conversation: An Epistemic Approach [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 58-69.
[11]	ZHOU Haiming. Theoretical Interpretation of Ontogenesis in SFL: Connotation, Origins and Implications [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 70-79.
[12]	LIN Yi. Language and Its Crisis in the Post-Truth Era [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 80-87.
[13]	HA Changchen, HUANG Guowen. New Thought of Ecolinguistics and Its Implications to Ecological Discourse Analysis [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 88-96.
[14]	WANG Yu, DU Shihong. A Reductive Analysis of Conceptual Metaphor from the Perspective of Philosophy of Dialogue [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 97-109.
[15]	WU Jianguo, XIE Sisi, LI Jing. Investigating Legitimization in Political Discourse from the Perspective of CMA:An Analysis of the US Governmental Discourse on China-US Trade Talks [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 460(4): 111-122.