Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies ›› 2013, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02): 22-27.
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Shiyu, MA Zheng
Online:
2013-02-15
Published:
2020-07-25
CLC Number:
WU Shiyu, MA Zheng. The Past and Present of Studies on Metaphor Processing and Understanding: From Implicit Comparison to Concept Construction[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2013, 13(02): 22-27.
Barsalou, L.1983. Ad hoc categories [J]. Memory and Cognition (11): 211-27. Black, M. 1993. More about metaphor [A]. In A. Ortony (ed). Metaphor and Thought [C]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Cacciari, C. & S. Glucksberg. 1994. Understanding figurative language [A]. In M. Gernsbacher (ed). Handbook of Psycholinguistics [C]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 447-77. Carston, R. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication [M]. Oxford: Blackwell. Carston, R. 2010a. Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images [J]. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Soceity 110: 293-321. Carston, R. 2010b. Lexical pragmatics, ad hoc concepts and metaphor: A relevance theory perspective [J]. Italian Journal of Linguistics 22(1): 1-28. Glucksberg, S. & B. Keysar. 1990. Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity [J]. Psychological Review 97(1): 3-18. Glucksberg, S., D. A. Manfredi & M. S. McGlone. 1997. Metaphor comprehension: How metaphors create new categories [A]. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith & J. Vaid (eds). Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes [C]. Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association. 327-50. Johnson, M. E. & R. Malgady. 1979. Some cognitive aspects of figurative language: Association and metaphor[J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (8): 253-65. Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Laudan, L. 1996. A problem-solving approach to scientific progress [A]. In P. Riggs (ed). Whys and Ways of Science: Introducing Philosophical and Sociological Theories of Science [C]. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press. 95-123 Malgady, R. G. & M. G. Johnson. 1976. Modifiers in metaphors: Effects of constituent phrase similarity on the interpretation of figurative sentences [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (5): 43-52. Miller, G. A. 1979. Images and models, similes and metaphors [A]. In A. Ortony (ed). Metaphor and Thought [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University. 357-400. Ortony, A. 1979. Beyond literal similarity [J]. Psychological Review 86: 161-80. Osgood, C., G. Suci & P. Tannenbaum. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning [M]. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Readence, J. E., R. S. Baldwin & A. M. Martin. 1984. Metaphorical interpretation: An investigation of the salience imbalance hypothesis [A]. In D. G. O’Brien (ed). Journal of Educational Psychology 76(4): 659-67. Recanati, F.2004. Literal Meaning [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tourangeau, R. & L. Rips. 1991. Interpreting and evaluating metaphor [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 452-72. Tourangeau, R. & R. J. Sternberg. 1982. Understanding and appreciating metaphors [J]. Cognition 11: 203-44. Trick, L. & A. N. Katz. 1986. The domain interaction approach to metaphor processing: Relating individual differences and metaphor characteristics [J]. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 1(3): 185-213. Tversky, A. 1977. Features of similarity [J]. Psychological Review 84: 327-52. Wilson, D. & D. Sperber. 2004. Relevance theory. In G. Ward & L. Horn (eds). Handbook of Pragmatics [C]. Oxford: Blackwell. 249-87. Wilson, D. & R. Carston. 2007. A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts [A]. In Burton-Roberts (ed). Advances in Pragmatics [C]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 230-60. Wilson, D. 2003. Relevance theory and lexical pragmatics [J]. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica 15: 273-91. 董成如.2007.词汇语用学的认知视角——话语中词义缩小和扩大的图式范畴化阐释[J].现代外语(3):231-38. 蒋严、袁影.2010.临场概念与隐喻分析[J].当代修辞学(3):1-6. 马玉俊.2009.隐喻理解加工策略的选择机制[D].河南大学硕士论文. 马拯、吴诗玉.2011.外语故事理解中的角色目标抑制研究[J].外语教学与研究(6):887-99. 吴诗玉、马拯.2012.中国学习者外语故事理解中心理表征建构过程及管理[J].现代外语(3):278-85. 周榕、黄希庭.1998.隐喻理解加工机制的研究[J].心理学动态(3):19-25. |
[1] | Shenghuan XU, Qian LIU. The application of Causal Implication Theory: Study of conversational implicature taken as an example [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 5-20. |
[2] | Chaojun YANG, Gengqian YANG. The Syntactic Mechanism of the Indirect Meaning of the WXDY Construction [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 71-83. |
[3] | LIU Longgen, ZHU Xiaozhen, HUO Wenjing. An Empirical Study on Chinese Advanced EFL Learners' Semantic Intuition about the Relationship of Literal Meaning with “What-Is-Said” [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(05): 50-62. |
[4] | XUE Xiaojiao, WANG Xiaonan, ZHOU Weijing. A Study on the Intelligibility of Chinese Learners' Productions of English /l/-/r/ [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(02): 44-56. |
[5] | YANG Yaping. The Revival of Ordinary Language Philosophy [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(01): 97-105. |
[6] | QI Xi. To Argue and Persuade—the Debatable Standing in New York Times Editorials [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(03): 24-28. |
[7] | XIAO Ruolin, WEI Naixing. A Corpus-based Contrastive Study of N that-cl Patterns in Research Articles by Chinese and Western Scholars [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(01): 34-41. |
[8] | QU Tao. Interactions in Linguistic and Multimodal Texts: A Case Study of Pride and Prejudice [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(09): 14-19. |
[9] | LEI Qian, ZHANG Delu. A Multimodal Stylistic Study on the Two Covers of Graham Rawle’s Woman’s World [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(09): 20-25. |
[10] | SHI Chunxu, WANG Zhenhua. The Holistic Appraisal Construction in Multimodal History Textbooks [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(09): 8-13. |
[11] | LIU Rui, ZHANG Del. On the Assessment Framework for Chinese College Students’ Multiliteracies in Foreign Languages [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(09): 26-31. |
[12] | SHEN Xingchen, CHEN Xinren. A Cognitive Pragmatic Approach to Referential Ambiguity in Advertisements: A Case Study of Car Ads [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(09): 33-38. |
[13] | WANG Xueyu. Diachronic Changes of Discourse and Identity Construction: A Historical Sociopragmatic Perspective [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(09): 39-43. |
[14] | QIAN Yonghong. Socio-psychological Mechanism Underlying Misleading Vague Language in Advertisements: A Critical Pragmatic Analysis [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(09): 44-48. |
[15] | WU Jue, YAO Yayan. Memetic Strategies in Micro-movie Advertisements [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(09): 49-51. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||