A Four Dimensional Framework Perspective on the Knowledge Dissipation Mechanism in the English Translation of TCM Theories in Jin Ping Mei

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2026.02.015

Abstract

CLC Number:

H315.9

DONG Yan, HUANG Fang. A Four Dimensional Framework Perspective on the Knowledge Dissipation Mechanism in the English Translation of TCM Theories in Jin Ping Mei[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 181-190.

References 27

[1]	Lam, W. C., A.P. Lyu & Z. X. Bian.2019. ICD11: Impact on Traditional Chinese Medicine and World Healthcare Systems[J]. Pharmaceutical Medicine 33(4): 373-377.
[2]	Nonaka, I. & G. Von Krogh. 2009. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory[J]. Organization Science 20(3):635-652.
[3]	Olmos, P. & L. Vega. 2011. The use of the script concept in argumentation theory[J]. Argumentation 25(2):415-426.
[4]	Roy, D. T. 1993. The Plum in the Golden Vase, or Chin Ping Mei:Volume One: The Gathering[M]. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
[5]	Roy, D. T. 2011. The Plum in the Golden Vase, or Chin P'ing Mei: Volume Four: The Climax[M]. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
[6]	陈大亮. 2022. 关于知识翻译学的元反思[J]. 当代外语研究(2):45-57.
[7]	杜世洪. 2024. 知识翻译学的学科基质[J]. 中国翻译45(1): 27-36, 189-190.
[8]	范永升. 2003. 金匮要略[M]. 北京: 中国中医药出版社.
[9]	傅敬民. 2024. 加强应用翻译研究的应用性研究——应用翻译研究有待拓展与深化的领域之一[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报46(6):3-14.
[10]	胡桑. 2020. “梅”开墙外:芮译《金瓶梅》在英语世界中的书评考察[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报43(1):126-134.
[11]	胡桑. 2026. 作为校勘者的译者:芮效卫的《金瓶梅词话》底本校勘与翻译[J]. 复旦外国语言文学论丛(1):160-170.
[12]	兰陵笑笑生. 2008. 汉英对照金瓶梅(C. Egerton 译)[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社.
[13]	蓝红军. 2022. 作为理论与方法的知识翻译学[J]. 当代外语研究(2):34-44, 161.
[14]	刘福林、康洁、李淑萍, 等. 2010. 知识群落概念模型[J]. 科学学研究(10):1445-1453.
[15]	刘晓林. 2002. 明清小说与中医文化[M]. 北京: 中国文联出版社.
[16]	齐林涛. 2020. 非现代元素的转移:《金瓶梅》英译过程中的制约因素和创造力(英文)[J]. 翻译界(2):98-110.
[17]	覃江华. 2022. 翻译与知识生产、管理和转化——知识翻译学刍议[J]. 当代外语研究(1):60-71.
[18]	史芸. 2025. 异域镜像:20世纪上半叶《金瓶梅》在英语世界的知识生产译介[J]. 当代外语研究(6):213-222.
[19]	温秀颖、王予辰. 2025. 《金瓶梅》英译百年:翻译策略演变与中国形象的跨文化表征[J]. 翻译界(2):57-68.
[20]	杨枫. 2021. 知识翻译学宣言[J]. 当代外语研究(5):2, 27.
[21]	杨枫. 2025. 从地方性到世界性:对外传播话语体系的范式转型与国际话语权构建[J]. 当代外语研究(6):1, 3-4.
[22]	杨枫. 2026. 知识翻译学视阈下的对外传播范式重构与实践路径[J]. 外语导刊49(1):114,115.
[23]	姚春鹏. 2009. 黄帝内经[M]. 北京: 中华书局.
[24]	于尔根·雷恩. 2024. 人类知识演化史(朱丹琼译)[M]. 北京: 九州出版社.
[25]	张义宏. 2017. 《金瓶梅》英译比较研究[D]. 北京: 北京外国语大学.
[26]	赵朝永. 2020. “再创作”vs“再阐释”——《金瓶梅》英译本语域变异动因分析[J]. 复旦外国语言文学论丛 (1):160-166.
[27]	周绚隆. 2022. 克莱门特的《金瓶梅》翻译[M]. 上海: 东方出版中心.

A Four Dimensional Framework Perspective on the Knowledge Dissipation Mechanism in the English Translation of TCM Theories in Jin Ping Mei

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 27

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHANG Daozhen. Transitivity Shifts and Cross-linguistic Reconstruction of Experiential Knowledge: Transknowletological Interpretation of the Fantasy Character in the Chinese Translation of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 101-114.
[2]	HUANG Qin, DANG Liangjun. The Global Transformation of Dietary Etiquette in Zuo Zhuan: The Co-translation from the Perspective of the Four-Dimensional Framework of Knowledge Circulation [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 115-127.
[3]	LIN Lin, CHEN Xiaojie. How Does Knowledge Grow? Cross-Cultural Reconstruction and Its Implications in Brook Ziporyn’s Self-Retranslation of Zhuangzi [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 128-139.
[4]	LI Jiayi. Between Faithfulness and Pragmatism: The Knowledge Reconstruction in Lin Shu’s Translations—Dual Perspectives of Transknowletology and Translator Behavior Criticism [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 140-149.
[5]	LIANG Xiaodong, REN Xiaolong. How Is Knowledge Globalized? The English Translation of the Interpretive Texts of the Eastern Qing Tombs Scenic Area from the Perspective of Transknowletology [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 150-158.
[6]	LU Jiawei. “Knowledge Flattening”: The Dilemma of MT+PE for the Cultural Images of Poenies and Its Solution from the Perspective of Transknowletology [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 159-171.
[7]	SUN Lijuan, WU Jian. From Social Mechanism to Knowledge Transformation: A Transknowlogical Reconstruction of the System Manipulation Norms Framework [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 172-180.
[8]	LI Guoling, LI Yuxuan. The Knowledge Production Mechanisms of Translational Paratexts: A Study Centered on Yoshida Tomio s Japanese Translations of Jia Pingwa s Novels [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 191-200.
[9]	ZHOU Yuanhang. Choosing the “Conventionalized Style”in Contract Translation: Register Crossing and Knowledge Reconstruction from the Perspective of Transknowletology [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 201-207.
[10]	FENG Yixin. Translator as a Knowledge Constructor: A Sociological Reinterpretation of Fei Xiaotong s Translation of Human Types FENG Yixin [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 208-216.
[11]	YAN Chengji. From “Translator” to “Knowledge Curator”: The Evolution of He Daokuan s Translation Ideas and Knowledge Construction from the Perspective of Transknowletology [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 217-225.
[12]	LI Jingyu, DANG Zhengsheng. Four Decades Translation History Studies in China from the Perspective of Transknowletology [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 226-236.
[13]	LUO Dijiang. Translation as Humanization: The Theoretical Framework and the Humanistic Turn in Transknowletology [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 45-54.
[14]	YANG Zhenyuan. From Fact to Mind Truth: Construction of Epistemic Translation’s Truth System [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 55-66.
[15]	WEI Dingwen. Unfaithfulness as Truth: The Translation of Concepts as Problématiques with a Comparative Review of Benjamin Schwartz’s and Huang Kewu’s Studies on Yan Fu [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(2): 67-77.