Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (5): 49-59.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.05.006
Previous Articles Next Articles
Online:
2020-09-28
Published:
2021-10-26
CLC Number:
WANG Zhexi. A Study on the Alignment Effect of Continuation and Rewriting[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2020, 20(5): 49-59.
[1] |
Atkinson, D., T. Nishino, E. Churchill & H. Okada. 2007. Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition[J]. The Modern Language Journal 91(2):169-188.
doi: 10.1111/modl.2007.91.issue-2 URL |
[2] |
Gebril, A. & L. Plakans. 2016. Source-based tasks in academic writing assessment: Lexical diversity, textual borrowing and proficiency[J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 24:78-88.
doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.10.001 URL |
[3] | Hunt, K. W. 1977. Early blooming and late blooming syntactic structures [A]. In C. Cooper & L. Odell (eds.). Evaluating Writing: Describing, Measuring, Judging [C]. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. 91-104. |
[4] |
Laufer, B. & J. Hulstijn. 2001. Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The effect of task-induced involvement load[J]. Applied Linguistics 22:1-26.
doi: 10.1093/applin/22.1.1 URL |
[5] |
Plakans, L. & A. Gebril. 2013. Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: Source text use as a predictor of score[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 22:217-230.
doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.02.003 URL |
[6] |
Pickering, M. J. & S. Garrod. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue[J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2):169-26.
pmid: 15595235 |
[7] |
Rassaei, E. 2017. Effects of three forms of reading-based output activity on L2 vocabulary learning[J]. Language Teaching Research 21(1):76-95.
doi: 10.1177/1362168815606160 URL |
[8] | Wang, C. M. & M. Wang. 2015. Effect of alignment on L2 written production[J]. Applied Linguistics 36(5):503-526. |
[9] |
Zhang X. Y. 2016. Reading-writing integrated tasks, comprehensive corrective feedback, and EFL writing development[J]. Language Teaching Research 21(2):217-240.
doi: 10.1177/1362168815623291 URL |
[10] | 纪小凌、 周岸勤. 2017. 读后续写对英语过去时态使用的影响[J]. 中国外语教育(3):39-45. |
[11] | 姜琳、 陈锦. 2015. 读后续写对英语写作语言准确性、复杂性和流利性发展的影响[J]. 现代外语(3):366-375. |
[12] | 姜琳、 涂孟玮. 2016. 读后续写对二语词汇学习的作用研究[J]. 现代外语(6):819-829. |
[13] | 缪海燕. 2017. 外语写作互动的语篇协同研究[J]. 现代外语(5):630-641. |
[14] | 王初明. 2010. 互动协同与外语教学[J]. 外语教学与研究(4):297-299. |
[15] | 王初明. 2011. 外语教学三大情结与语言习得有效路径[J]. 外语教学与研究(4):540-549. |
[16] | 王初明. 2014. 内容要创造语言要模仿——有效外语教学和学习的基本思路[J]. 外语界(2):42-48. |
[17] | 王初明. 2015. 读后续写何以有效促学[J]. 外语教学与研究(5):753-762. |
[18] | 王初明. 2016. 以“续”促学[J]. 现代外语(6):784-793. |
[19] | 王初明. 2017. 从“以写促学”到“以续促学”[J]. 外语教学与研究(4):547-556. |
[20] | 王初明. 2018. 如何提高读后续写中的互动强度[J]. 外语界(5):40-45. |
[21] | 王敏、 王初明. 2014. 读后续写的协同效应[J]. 现代外语(4):501-512. |
[22] | 王启、 王凤兰. 2016. 汉语二语读后续写的协同效应[J]. 现代外语(6):794-805. |
[23] | 张秀芹、 张倩. 2017. 不同体裁读后续写对协同的影响差异研究[J]. 外语界(3):90-96. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||