The Dual Mode of Knowledge Translation: James Legge’s Chinese Translation of Graduated Reading; Comprising a Circle of Knowledge, in 200 Lessons

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2026.01.016

Abstract

Abstract:

The Circle of Knowledge served as a significant Chinese-English translation that played a crucial role in introducing and disseminating modern knowledge from the West in 19th century China. The famous British Sinologist James Legge translated this book into Chinese, and this study delves into his mode of translation. The research reveals that Legge’s Chinese translation appears as enlightenment on the surface but is actually reflective of a mode of education of British cultural imperialism in China. Therefore, it is a dual mode of knowledge translation. In terms of knowledge, Legge introduced modern scientific knowledge to China for the sake of disseminating the knowledge of Christianity and the English language in the country. In terms of the presentation of knowledge, in order to be accepted in China at that time, Legge adopted the strategy of mediation in translation, including expansion, replacement and reframing.

Key words: knowledge translation, dual mode, mode, James Legge, The Circle of Knowledge

CLC Number:

H315.9

WU Guangjun. The Dual Mode of Knowledge Translation: James Legge’s Chinese Translation of Graduated Reading; Comprising a Circle of Knowledge, in 200 Lessons[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026, 26(1): 195-206.

Figures/Tables 1

References 30

[1]	Baker, C. 1864. Graduated Reading; Comprising A Circle of Knowledge, in 200 Lessons[M]. London: London Missionary Society Press.
[2]	Baumgarten, S. 2015. Language, translation and imperialism[A]. In I. Ness & Z. Cope (eds.). The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism[C]. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 513-517.
[3]	Bennett, K. 2023. Approaches to knowledge translation[A]. In R. Meylaerts & K. Marais (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Translation Theory and Concepts[C]. London: Routledge. 443-462.
[4]	Bennett, K. 2026. Epistemic translation: Towards an ecology of knowledges[J]. Perspectives (1): 16-31.
[5]	Darwin, J. 1997. Imperialism and the victorians: The dynamics of territorial expansion[J]. The English Historical Review CXⅡ(447): 614-642.
[6]	Delanty, G. 1995. Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality[M]. New York: St Martin’s Press.
[7]	Girardot, N. 2002. The Victorian Translation of China: James Legge’s Oriental Pilgrimage[M]. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
[8]	Harris, P. 1991. Cultural imperialism and American protestant missionaries: Collaboration and dependency in Mid-nineteenth-Century China[J]. Pacific Historical Review (3): 309-338.
[9]	Heraclides, A. & A. Dialla. 2015. Humanitarian Intervention in the Long Nineteenth Century: Setting the Precedent[M]. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
[10]	Kasaba, R. 1993. Treaties and friendships: British imperialism, the Ottoman Empire, and China in the nineteenth century[J]. Journal of World History (2): 215-241.
[11]	Lazich, M. 2004. The diffusion of useful knowledge in China: The canton era information strategy[A]. In M. Lackner & N. Vittinghoff (eds.). Mapping Meanings: The Field of New Learning in Late Qing China[C]. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 305-327.
[12]	Legge, J. 1856. Graduated Reading; Comprising a Circle of Knowledge, in 200 Lessons(《智环启蒙塾课初步》) [Z]. Hong Kong: The Anglo-Chinese College.
[13]	Liddicoat, A. 2016. Intercultural mediation, intercultural communication and translation[J]. Perspectives (3): 354-364.
[14]	Said, E. 1993. Culture and Imperialism[M]. New York: Vintage Books.
[15]	Thomas, N. 1994. Colonialism’s Culture: Anthropology, Travel, and Government[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[16]	Wang, H. 2022. Discursive Mediation in Translation: Living History and its Chinese Translations[M]. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
[17]	陈大亮. 2022. 关于知识翻译学的元反思[J]. 当代外语研究(2):45-57.
[18]	樊慧颖、刘凡夫. 2010. 从汉译《智环启蒙塾课初步》看近代中日间新词语的传播[J]. 日本研究(1):116-119.
[19]	胡译之. 2019. 理雅各眼中的中国及其中国观[J]. 社会科学(2):149-160.
[20]	赖俊楠. 2017. “文明论”视野下的晚清中国及其对外关系——以《中国评论》(1872—1901)为考察对象[J]. 华东政法大学学报(4):167-180.
[21]	莱依奇. 2004. 在中国传播实用知识:广州贸易体制时期的信息战略[A].朗宓榭、费南山(李永胜、李增田译). 呈现意义:晚清中国新学领域(上)[C]. 天津: 天津人民出版社.309-331.
[22]	理雅各. 1856. 智环启蒙塾课初步[M]. 香港: 香港英华书院.
[23]	梁志芳. 2017. 文学翻译与民族建构:形象学理论视角下的《大地》中译研究[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社.
[24]	沈国威. 2010a. 香港英华书院的出版物在上海和日本——以《遐迩贯珍》、《智环启蒙》为中心[A].香港城市大学中国文化中心、出版博物馆. 出版文化的新世界:香港与上海[C]. 上海: 上海人民出版社.201-219.
[25]	沈国威. 2010b. 近代中日词汇交流研究:汉字新词的创制、容受与共享[M]. 北京: 中华书局.
[26]	熊月之. 2010. 西学东渐与晚清社会[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
[27]	薛超睿. 2017. 从《礼记》英译本“序言”看理雅各对中国礼学的接受[J]. 中华文化论坛(7): 13-18.
[28]	严程极、杨枫. 2022. 知识翻译学的知识渊源[J]. 上海翻译(6):39-43.
[29]	杨枫. 2022. 知识翻译学的翻译定义与分类[J]. 当代外语研究 (1):1-2.
[30]	周宁. 2006. 天朝遥远: 西方的中国形象研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社.