有异位妊娠史患者冷冻胚胎移植周期两种内膜准备方案的妊娠结局比较

doi:10.16150/j.1671-2870.2017.02.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨自然周期和激素替代周期这2种内膜准备方案,对有异位妊娠史患者冷冻胚胎移植周期妊娠结局的影响。方法回顾性分析行体外受精/卵细胞质内单精子显微注射及冷冻胚胎移植且有异位妊娠史的914例患者,并通过倾向性得分匹配的方法对采用自然周期进行内膜准备的患者（428例）和采用激素替代周期进行内膜准备的患者（486例）进行匹配,最终获得匹配周期379对,分为自然周期组和激素替代组,比较2组的妊娠结局。结果自然周期组与激素替代组在年龄、体质量指数、先前足月产数、输卵管手术史、原发或继发不孕、诊断、移植日内膜厚度、移植胚胎数、移植胚胎阶段和治疗年份等基本特征上的差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。妊娠结局方面,2组患者的异位妊娠发生率并无统计学差异（5.2%比7.5%,P>0.05）,而2组间的生化妊娠率、临床妊娠率、分娩率、流产率和多胎率等指标差异也均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论在冷冻胚胎移植周期中,对有异位妊娠史的患者采用自然周期或激素替代周期进行内膜准备,患者异位妊娠的复发风险相似,并可获得相似的妊娠结局。

关键词: 体外受精, 异位妊娠, 自然周期, 激素替代, 冷冻胚胎移植

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effect of different endometrial preparation on outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) frozen-thawed embryo plantation in patients with history of ectopic pregnancy. Methods: Data from 914 patients with history of ectopic pregnancy who underwent IVF/ICSI frozen-thawed embryo plantation from January 2012 to December 2014 were collected. Patients undergoing natural cycles and those undergoing artificial cycles were matched into 379 pairs by propensity score matching. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two matched groups of patients. Results: The basic characteristics including maternal age, body mass index, full-term birth history, primary or secondary infertility, previous tubal surgery history, infertility diagnosis, endometrial thickness on embryo plantation day, number and stage of embryos planted, and year of treatment were not significantly different between the two groups (P>; 0.05). As for pregnancy outcome, the ectopic pregnancy rate of the two groups was not significantly different (5.2% vs.7.5%, P>; 0.05). Moreover, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, delivery rate, miscarriage rate, and multiple pregnancy rate of the two groups were also not significantly different (P>; 0.05). Conclusions: In IVF/ICSI frozen-thawed embryo plantation, natural cycles and artificial cycles have similar effect on recurrence risk of ectopic pregnancy, and have comparable pregnancy outcome.

Key words: In vitro fertilization, Ectopic pregnancy, Natural cycles, Artificial cycles, Frozen-thawed embryo plantation

中图分类号:

R713.8

杜通, 吕祁峰. 有异位妊娠史患者冷冻胚胎移植周期两种内膜准备方案的妊娠结局比较[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2017, 16(02): 208-212.

DU Tong, LYU Qifeng. Comparison of pregnancy outcome of frozen-thawed embryo plantation with two different endometrial preparation in patients with history of ectopic pregnancy[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2017, 16(02): 208-212.

参考文献

[1] Refaat B, Dalton E, Ledger WL.Ectopic pregnancy secon-dary to in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: pathogenic mechanisms and management strategies[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol,2015,13:30.
[2] Li Z, Sullivan EA, Chapman M, et al.Risk of ectopic pregnancy lowest with transfer of single frozen blastocyst[J]. Hum Reprod,2015,30(9):2048-2054.
[3] Shaw JL, Dey SK, Critchley HO, et al.Current know-ledge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy[J]. Hum Reprod Update,2010,16(4):432-444.
[4] Marion LL, Meeks GR.Ectopic pregnancy: History, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2012,55(2):376-386.
[5] Weigert M, Gruber D, Pernicka E, et al.Previous tubal ectopic pregnancy raises the incidence of repeated ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet,2009,26(1):13-17.
[6] Zhang YL, Sun J, Su YC, et al.Ectopic pregnancy in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of 4,034 cycles and related factors[J]. Syst Biol Reprod Med,2013,59(1):34-37.
[7] Richter KS, Ginsburg DK, Shipley SK, et al.Factors associated with birth outcomes from cryopreserved blastocysts: experience from 4,597 autologous transfers of 7,597 cryopreserved blastocysts[J]. Fertil Steril,2016, 106(2):354-362.
[8] Stehlik E, Stehlik J, Katayama KP, et al.Vitrification demonstrates significant improvement versus slow freezi-ng of human blastocysts[J]. Reprod Biomed Online,2005, 11(1):53-57.
[9] Savasi V, Leone FP, Fusè F, et al.Assisted reproductive technologies and uterine factors influencing their success[J]. Minerva Ginecol,2013,65(5):505-524.
[10] Londra L, Moreau C, Strobino D, et al.Ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: differences between fresh and frozen-thawed cycles[J]. Fertil Steril,2015,104(1):110-118.
[11] Perkins KM, Boulet SL, Kissin DM, et al.Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001-2011[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2015,125(1):70-78.
[12] Trounson A, Mohr L.Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo[J]. Nature, 1983,305(5936):707-709.
[13] Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Hunter HR, et al.Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study[J]. Fertil Steril,2006,85(3):603-609.
[14] Ghobara T, Vandekerckhove P. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2008,(1):CD003414.
[15] Roque M.Freeze-all policy: is it time for that?[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet,2015,32(2):171-176.
[16] Roque M, Valle M, Guimarães F, et al.Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer[J]. Fertil Steril,2015,103(5):1190-1193.
[17] Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H,et al.Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles[J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 99(2):389-392.
[18] Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AE, Kollen BJ, et al.What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hum Reprod Update,2013,19(5):458-470.
[19] Acharya KS, Acharya CR, Provost MP, et al.Ectopic pregnancy rate increases with the number of retrieved oocytes in autologous in vitro fertilization with non-tubal infertility but not donor/recipient cycles: an analysis of 109,140 clinical pregnancies from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry[J]. Fertil Steril, 2015, 104(4):873-878.
[20] Ankum WM, Mol BW, van der Veen F, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 1996,65(6):1093-1099.
[21] Karaer A, Avsar FA, Batioglu S.Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol,2006,46(6):521-527.
[22] Xu Z, Yan L, Liu W, et al.Effect of treatment of a pre-vious ectopic pregnancy on in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Fertil Steril,2015,104(6):1446-1455.
[23] Whittaker W, Anselmi L, Kristensen SR, et al.Associations between extending access to primary care and emergency department visits: A difference-in-differences analysis[J]. PLoS Med,2016,13(9):e1002113.
[24] Shaw JL, Dey SK, Critchley HO, et al.Current knowled-ge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy[J]. Hum Reprod Update,2010,16(4):432-444.