SOAR评分对急性缺血性卒中患者不良预后风险预测价值的探讨

doi:10.16150/j.1671-2870.2018.04.013

诊断学理论与实践 ›› 2018, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04): 423-427.doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2018.04.013

SOAR评分对急性缺血性卒中患者不良预后风险预测价值的探讨

计海峰^a, 杨雪莲^a, 姚峪岚^b, 蔡丽瑛^a, 来小音^a, 吴大玉^a, 徐瑜梅^a, 江梅^a

上海市浦东新区公利医院a. 神经内科,b. 重症医学科,上海 200135

收稿日期:2018-05-30 出版日期:2018-08-25 发布日期:2018-08-25
通讯作者: 江梅 E-mail: jiangmei0416@sina.com
基金资助:
上海市浦东新区卫生系统学科带头人培养计划（PWRd2014-09）; 浦东新区科技发展基金（PKJ2017-Y24）,国家自然科学基金（81201029、81771328）; 上海市医学重点专科建设计划项目（ZK2015B16）; 上海市卫生计生系统优秀学科带头人培养计划（2017BR051）

Validation of mSORE score for predicting poor outcome in acute ischemic stroke

JI Haifeng^a, YANG Xuelian^a, YAO Yulan^b, CAI Liying^a, LAI Xiaoyin^a, WU Dayu^a, XU Yumei^a, JIANG Mei^a

a. Department of Neurology, b. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Gongli Hospital, Shanghai 200135, China

Received:2018-05-30 Online:2018-08-25 Published:2018-08-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：探讨改良SOAR（Stroke subtype, Oxfordshire community stroke project classification, Age and prestroke modified rankin, mSOAR）评分对我国急性缺血性卒中（acute ischemic stroke,AIS）患者出院时发生不良预后事件的预测价值。方法：分析2014年10月至2017年12月公利医院神经内科和急诊科收治的AIS患者1 461例,记录年龄、性别、牛津郡社区卒中项目（Oxfordshire community stroke project,OCSP）分型、卒中前改良Rankin量表（modified Rankin Scale,mRS）评分和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表（National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale,NIHSS）评分等信息,并于入院时使用mSOAR量表进行评分。所有患者出院时均行mRS评分,以出院时出现死亡或重度残疾（mRS≥4分）作为不良预后事件。结果：出院时382例（26.1%）患者出现不良预后事件。在mSOAR评分1~6分之间,每增加1分,患者出院时存在残疾的风险都会有显著增加(P<0.001),出院时不良预后风险在mSOAR评分 0~3分组与4~8分组之间差异有统计学意义（P<0.001）。mSOAR评分预测患者出院时不良预后风险时的受试者工作特征（receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC）曲线下面积（area under curve,AUC）为0.868（95%CI为0.844~0.891）。结论：mSOAR量表对我国AIS患者出院时发生不良预后事件的风险预测能力较强。

关键词: 缺血性卒中, 预后, 量表, 受试者工作特征曲线

Abstract: Objective: To explore the value of mSOAR score for predicting the occurrence of adverse prognostic events at discharge in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: From October 2014 to December 2017, a total of 1 461 AIS patients hospitalized in Neurology Department and Emergency Department of our hospital were enrolled. Related baseline data including age, gender were recorded and Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) classification, pre-stroke modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score as well as the mSOAR score were assessed at admission. The adverse prognostic events were defined as death or poor functional outcome with modified Rankin Scale (≥4) when patients were discharged. Results: Of all the subjects, 382 cases(26.1%) had adverse prognostic events at discharge. Between points 1-6, a one-point increase in mSOAR score resulted in a signi-ficant increase in risk of poor prognosis at discharge (P<0.001), and the risk of poor prognosis at discharge between 0-3 and 4-8 in mSOAR score was significantly different (P<0.001). The risk of poor prognosis at discharge was predicted and the AUC value for the mSOAR score was 0.868 (95% CI 0.844-0.891). Conclusions: mSOAR score has a strong ability for predicting the risk of adverse prognostic events at discharge in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Key words: Acute ischemic stroke, Prognosis, Score, Receiver operating characteristic curve

中图分类号:

R743

计海峰, 杨雪莲, 姚峪岚, 蔡丽瑛, 来小音, 吴大玉, 徐瑜梅, 江梅. SOAR评分对急性缺血性卒中患者不良预后风险预测价值的探讨[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2018, 17(04): 423-427.

JI Haifeng, YANG Xuelian, YAO Yulan, CAI Liying, LAI Xiaoyin, WU Dayu, XU Yumei, JIANG Mei. Validation of mSORE score for predicting poor outcome in acute ischemic stroke[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2018, 17(04): 423-427.

参考文献

[1] Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al.Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation,2017,135(10):e146-e603.
[2] Wang W, Jiang B, Sun H, et al.Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality of Stroke in China: Results from a Nationwide Population-Based Survey of 480?687 Adults[J]. Circulation,2017,135(8):759-771.
[3] 苏民, 赵晓晶, 王大力. APACHEⅡ评分对脑卒中患者预后评估的价值[J]. 中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2006,9(7): 693-694.
[4] Ueshima H, Sekikawa A, Miura K, et al.Cardiovascular disease and risk factors in Asia: a selected review[J]. Circulation,2008,118(25):2702-2709.
[5] Counsell C, Dennis M, McDowall M, et al. Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models[J]. Stroke,2002, 33(4):1041-1047.
[6] Ntaios G, Faouzi M, Ferrari J, et al.An integer-based score to predict functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke: the ASTRAL score[J]. Neurology,2012,78(24):1916-1922.
[7] Wang Y, Lim LL, Levi C, et al.A prognostic index for 30-day mortality after stroke[J]. J Clin Epidemiol,2001, 54(8):766-773.
[8] Wang Y, Lim LL, Heller RF, et al.A prediction model of 1-year mortality for acute ischemic stroke patients[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2003,84(7):1006-1011.
[9] Myint PK, Clark AB, Kwok CS, et al.The SOAR (Stroke subtype, Oxford Community Stroke Project classification, Age, prestroke modified Rankin) score strongly predicts early outcomes in acute stroke[J]. Int J Stroke,2014,9(3):278-283.
[10] Abdul-Rahim AH, Quinn TJ, Alder S, et al.Derivation and Validation of a Novel Prognostic Scale (Modified-Stroke Subtype, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project Classification, Age, and Prestroke Modified Rankin) to Predict Early Mortality in Acute Stroke[J]. Stroke,2016, 47(1):74-79.
[11] Wang H, Pan Y, Meng X, et al.Validation of the mSOAR and SOAR scores to predict early mortality in Chinese acute stroke patients[J]. PLoS One,2017,12(7):e0180444.
[12] Thaller M, Mitchell N. mSOAR: an effective bedside stroke prognosis tool[J]. Clin Med,2017,17(3):204-208.
[13] 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2014[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2015,48(4):246-257.
[14] Fearon P, McArthur KS, Garrity K, et al. Prestroke modified rankin stroke scale has moderate interobserver reliability and validity in an acute stroke setting[J]. Stroke,2012,43(12):3184-3188.
[15] Kwok CS, Clark A, Ford GA, et al.Association between prestroke disability and inpatient mortality and length of acute hospital stay after acute stroke[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc,2012,60(4):726-732.
[16] Forti P, Maioli F, Procaccianti G, et al.Independent predictors of ischemic stroke in the elderly: prospective data from a stroke unit[J]. Neurology,2013,80(1):29-38.
[17] Sung SF, Chen YW, Hung LC, et al.Revised iScore to predict outcomes after acute ischemic stroke[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2014,23(6):1634-1639.
[18] Xu J, Tao Y, Xie X, et al.A Comparison of Mortality Prognostic Scores in Ischemic Stroke Patients[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2016,25(2):241-247.
[19] Saposnik G, Raptis S, Kapral MK, et al.The iScore predicts poor functional outcomes early after hospitalization for an acute ischemic stroke[J]. Stroke,2011,42(12):3421-3428.

SOAR评分对急性缺血性卒中患者不良预后风险预测价值的探讨

Validation of mSORE score for predicting poor outcome in acute ischemic stroke

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	谢吻, 梁怀予, 董磊, 袁菲, 王朝夫, 郭滟. 胰腺导管腺癌重要驱动基因突变与临床病理特征、预后间相关性的分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(05): 581-587.
[2]	宋洛卿, 戴廷军. 原发性抗磷脂综合征合并烟雾综合征一例并文献复习[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(04): 497-503.
[3]	李蕾, 袁菲, 王朝夫, 许海敏, 王婷. 101例壶腹部腺癌临床病理及预后因素分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(03): 355-361.
[4]	陈曦, 杜鹃. 多发性骨髓瘤预后风险的精准评估[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(06): 522-528.
[5]	冯国伟, 张晓娟, 郭睿, 关哲, 王越. 治疗前¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT显像对结外NK/T细胞淋巴瘤的预后判断价值[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(06): 533-539.
[6]	梁亚丽, 赵海港, 项广宇. 应激性高血糖比值预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者溶栓治疗后1年不良预后的价值[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(06): 562-566.
[7]	冯明洋, 丁叶舟, 赵青青, 赵钢德, 娄世珂, 郑超, 孙学华, 刘柯慧, 林兰意, 谢青, 郑岚, 王晖. 肝衰竭患者中医证型与西医肝衰竭分期之间的关系观察[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(04): 391-395.
[8]	芮文斌, 徐达, 祝宇, 吴瑜璇, 王浩飞, 汪成合, 袁菲. 缺氧诱导因子1α在乳头状肾细胞癌中的表达及其与预后的关系[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(03): 265-370.
[9]	盛虹, 章安迪. 慢性心力衰竭住院患者营养风险评估的临床应用研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(02): 178-183.
[10]	刘彤, 王鑫. 心房颤动预后不良风险的评估策略[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(06): 555-558.
[11]	张中文, 左祥荣, 郑绪辉, 曹权, 李新立, 李艳秀. 3q26 rs12696304基因多态性与中国南方汉族老年人群急性心力衰竭患者一年预后间的关系研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(06): 565-571.
[12]	徐兆平, 王浩飞. ZNF692基因在肾透明细胞癌中的表达及其与患者预后间关系的研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(03): 292-296.
[13]	杜海磊, 陈聆, 罗方秀, 李勇, 程齐俭, 朱良纲, 杭钧彪. Beclin-1和Bcl-2表达与非小细胞肺癌患者病理特征及预后间关系的研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(03): 258-263.
[14]	杜云志, 冯菁华, 常春康. 二代测序技术在骨髓增生异常综合征临床诊断和治疗决策中的应用进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(06): 685-671.
[15]	陆燕青, 陈捷, 马建芳, 万燕萍. 不安腿综合征患者的临床肌电图学研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(05): 565-569.