诊断学理论与实践 ›› 2020, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 37-43.doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2020.01.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

曼氏裂头蚴病52例临床特点及误诊分析

史冬梅, 王晓琳(), 陈璐, 谢青   

  1. 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院感染科,上海 200025
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-15 出版日期:2020-02-25 发布日期:2020-02-25
  • 通讯作者: 王晓琳 E-mail:157267879@qq.com

Clinical characteristics and misdiagnosis analysis of sparganosis:A retrospective study of 52 cases

SHI Dongmei, WANG Xiaolin(), CHEN Lu, XIE Qing   

  1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2019-05-15 Online:2020-02-25 Published:2020-02-25
  • Contact: WANG Xiaolin E-mail:157267879@qq.com

摘要:

目的:总结曼氏裂头蚴病(sparganosis)的临床特点,并分析其中部分患者的误诊原因,以提高医师的诊断水平,减少误诊。方法:回顾性分析2006年8月至2018年8月年间我院收治的52例曼氏裂头蚴病患者临床资料,对其流行病学资料、临床症状、辅助检查结果及误诊原因进行统计分析。结果:52例曼氏裂头蚴病患者中,男性30例,女性22例,平均年龄为39.8岁。首诊时误诊率达57.7%(30例),其中13例颅内曼氏裂头蚴病患者被误诊为颅内感染(包括脑肿瘤4例、脑脓肿2例、脑炎症肉芽肿2例、癫痫5例),17例颅外曼氏裂头蚴病患者被误诊为颅外感染(包括肺部感染7例、肺结核1例、阑尾炎2例、慢性胃炎并十二指肠溃疡1例、小肠克罗恩病伴肠梗阻1例、肝脓肿1例、脾占位1例、类风湿关节炎2例、慢性粒细胞白血病1例)。52例曼氏裂头蚴病患者中63.5%(33例)有食用蛙肉、蛇肉、生食蛇胆史,53.8%(28例)的患者血常规检查嗜酸性粒细胞百分比升高(>5%)。所有患者的外周血清曼氏裂头蚴抗体检查均呈阳性,均经病理活检和虫体鉴定证实。最终,患者的治愈率达86.5%,其中采用吡喹酮(praziquantel)治愈22例(42.3%),吡喹酮联合手术治愈22例(42.3%),另有8例(15.4%)患者复发。结论:曼氏裂头蚴病患者的临床表现复杂多样,容易被误诊,尤其是对于血象或临床症状不典型者及之前的治疗反应欠佳者,需细致询问其流行病学史,同时行血清寄生虫抗体常规筛查十分重要,对于怀疑颅内感染者,行MRI检查有助于鉴别诊断。

关键词: 曼氏裂头蚴病, 临床特征, 误诊

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics and causes of misdiagnosis of sparganosis. Methods: A total of 52 cases with sparganosis were enrolled from August, 2006 through August, 2018 in Department of Infectious Diseases of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The epidemiological and clinical data were retrieved and causes of misdiagnosis were retrospectively analyzed. Result: The sparganosis was mostly found in middle aged man with an average age of 39.8 years and male to female ratio of 1.36∶1. The sparganosis was highly likely to be misdiagnosed and 57.7% of patients (30/52) had not be recognized upon first clinical consultation. Thirteen patients with the cerebral sparganosis had been misdiagnosed as ascerebral tumor (4/52), brain abscess(2/52), encephalitis granuloma(2/52), and epilepsy(5/52), while patients with extracranial sparganosis(17/52)were considered as pulmonary infection (7/52), pulmonary Tuberculosis(1/52), acute appendicitis(2/52), chronic gastritis combined with twelve fat intestinal ulcer 1/52), intestinal Crohn with obstruction (1/52), liver abscesss (1/52), splenic space-occupying lesion (1/52), rheumatoid arthritis(1/52), chronicmyelocytic leukemia(1 /52). Inquiry of clinical history revealed raw frogs or snakes eating were seen in most of patients(63.5%, 33/52)with eosinophilia as a common laboratory findings (53.8%, 28/52). Serum anti-sparganosis. antibody was detected in all the 52 patients and the diagnosis were all confirmed by pathological examination and identification of worm body. Most cases were cured (84.6%, 44/52), with either praziquantel alone (42.3%, 22/52) or combined with operation (42.3%, 22/52). Eight cases (15.4%) had the relapse. Conclusions: The clinical manifestations of sparganosis varies among patients and is often misdiagnosed. The proper epidemiological investigation is critical for differential diagnosis, particularly for patients with atypical presentation. The MRI imaging study and serum screening of antibody against parasite are essential for establishing the diagnosis.

Key words: Sparganosis, Clinical features, Misdiagnosis

中图分类号: