内科理论与实践 ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03): 178-182.doi: 10.16138/j.1673-6087.2021.03.008
黄磊a, 叶晨静a, 吴超a, 徐文彬a, 俞晴a, 李军民b, 阎骅a,b()
收稿日期:
2021-01-11
出版日期:
2021-06-25
发布日期:
2022-07-26
通讯作者:
阎骅
E-mail:yanhua_candy@163.com
HUANG Leia, YE Chenjinga, WU Chaoa, XU Wenbina, YU Qinga, LI Junminb, YAN Huaa,b()
Received:
2021-01-11
Online:
2021-06-25
Published:
2022-07-26
Contact:
YAN Hua
E-mail:yanhua_candy@163.com
摘要:
目的:观察以阿扎胞苷联合venetoclax治疗新诊断老年急性髓系白血病(acute myeloid leukemia,AML)的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院2018年3月至2020年9月收治的14例新诊断初治、不适合强化疗老年AML患者,阿扎胞苷75 mg/m2第1~7天(d1~7) 皮下注射,venetoclax每日口服400 mg d1~28,28 d为1个疗程(首次疗程venetoclax 100 mg d1、200 mg d2、400 mg d3~28口服)。临床观察主要终点为复合完全缓解率[完全缓解(complete remission,CR)+CR伴血细胞不完全恢复(CR with incomplete blood count recovery,CRi)]、总反应率(overall response rate,ORR)、首次到达反应时间及反应持续时间(duration of response,DOR),次要终点为总生存(overall survival,OS)期及药物安全性。结果:14例老年AML患者中位随访时间为12.5(2.0~24.0)个月,CR+CRi率为71%,ORR为79%,中位首次到达反应时间为1.1(1.0~2.1)个月,中位DOR为16.0个月[95%置信区间(confidence interval,CI): 4.0~未达到(not reached, NR)],中位OS期为14.0个月(95%CI: 2.0~NR);在细胞遗传学中高危的12例患者中,共8例(67%)获CR+CRi,中位DOR为9.0个月(95%CI: 2.0~NR),中位OS期为11.0个月(95%CI: 2.0~NR);在CR+CRi的10例患者中,至少1次达到微小残留病灶(minimal residual disease, MRD)<0.01%有8例(80%),其中位DOR为17.0个月(95%CI: 4.0~NR),中位OS期未达到(95%CI: 6.0~NR)。所有患者都发生血液系统不同程度的细胞减少,最常见的3级以上不良反应为粒细胞减少(100%),粒细胞减少伴发热6例(43%),血小板减少7例(50%),贫血5例(36%);血液系统以外常见的主要为胃肠道反应,皆为可控的1~2级;1例发生肿瘤溶解综合征;大部分患者耐受。结论:初步结果表明,阿扎胞苷联合venetoclax有效且安全,为不适合强化疗的初治老年AML患者提供了治疗选择。
中图分类号:
黄磊, 叶晨静, 吴超, 徐文彬, 俞晴, 李军民, 阎骅. 阿扎胞苷联合venetoclax治疗新诊断老年急性髓系白血病的临床观察[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2021, 16(03): 178-182.
HUANG Lei, YE Chenjing, WU Chao, XU Wenbin, YU Qing, LI Junmin, YAN Hua. Clinical observation of the combination therapy of azacitidine and venetoclax in newly diagnosed, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Journal of Internal Medicine Concepts & Practice, 2021, 16(03): 178-182.
表1
患者基本特性,疗效评价及生存情况(n=14)
特征 | n(%) | 复合完全缓解率(CR+CRi)[n(%)] | 中位DOR(月)(95%CI) | 中位OS(月)(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
所有患者(n) | 14 | (8+2)[10(71)] | 16.0(4.0~NR) | 14.0(2.0~NR) |
ECOG评分[n(%)] | ||||
1分 | 5(36) | |||
2分 | 8(57) | |||
3分 | 1(7) | |||
细胞遗传学[n(%)] | ||||
低危 | 2(14) | |||
中高危 | 12(86) | (7+1)[8(67)] | 9.0(2.0~NR) | 11.0(2.0~NR) |
基因突变[n(%)] | ||||
NPM1 | 5(36) | (3+1)[4(80)] | 17.5(7.0~NR) | NR(6.0~NR) |
TP53 | 4(29) | (2+0)[2(50)] | NR(2.0~NR) | 11.0(2.0~NR) |
FLT3-ITD | 1(7) | |||
基线骨髓原始细胞数[n(%)] | ||||
<30% | 3(21) | |||
≥30%且<50% | 2(14) | |||
≥50% | 9(64) | |||
CR+CRi(n) | 8+2(10) | |||
MRD<0.01%,n(%) | 8(80) | 17.0(4.0~NR) | NR(6.0~NR) |
[1] |
Estey E, Karp JE, Emadi A, et al. Recent drug approvals for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: gifts or a Trojan horse[J]?. Leukemia, 2020, 34(3): 671-681.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0704-5 URL |
[2] |
DiNardo CD, Pratz KW, Letai A, et al. Safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2018, 19(2): 216-228.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30010-X URL |
[3] |
DiNardo CD, Pratz K, Pullarkat V, et al. Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Blood, 2019, 133(1): 7-17.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-08-868752 URL |
[4] | Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia[J]. Blood, 2016, 128(3): 462-463. |
[5] |
Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21(24): 4642-4649.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.036 pmid: 14673054 |
[6] | Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2016[EB/OL]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute,2019. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/. |
[7] |
Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellström-Lindberg E, et al. Azacitidine prolongs overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in elderly patients with low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(4): 562-569.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8329 URL |
[8] |
Pleyer L, Burgstaller S, Girschikofsky M, et al. Azacitidine in 302 patients with WHO-defined acute myeloid leukemia: results from the Austrian Azacitidine Registry of the AGMT-Study Group[J]. Ann Hematol, 2014, 93(11): 1825-1838.
doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2126-9 pmid: 24951123 |
[9] |
Dombret H, Seymour JF, Butrym A, et al. International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts[J]. Blood, 2015, 126(3): 291-299.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-621664 pmid: 25987659 |
[10] |
Konopleva M, Pollyea DA, Potluri J, et al. Efficacy and biological correlates of response in a phase Ⅱ study of venetoclax monotherapy in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia[J]. Cancer Discov, 2016, 6(10): 1106-1117.
pmid: 27520294 |
[11] |
Bogenberger JM, Delman D, Hansen N, et al. Ex vivo activity of BCL-2 family inhibitors ABT-199 and ABT-737 combined with 5-azacytidine in myeloid malignancies[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2015, 56(1): 226-229.
doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.910657 URL |
[12] | Bose P, Gandhi V, Konopleva M. Pathways and mechanisms of venetoclax resistance[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2017, 58(9): 1-17. |
[13] |
Teh TC, Nguyen NY, Moujalled DM, et al. Enhancing venetoclax activity in acute myeloid leukemia by co-targeting MCL1[J]. Leukemia, 2018, 32(2): 303-312.
doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.243 pmid: 28751770 |
[14] |
DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V, et al. Azacitidine and venetoclax in previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 383(7): 617-629.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2012971 URL |
[15] |
Davids MS, Hallek M, Wierda W, et al. Comprehensive safety analysis of venetoclax monotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2018, 24(18): 4371-4379.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3761 URL |
[1] | 周荣 综述 高伟成 审校. 老年性上睑下垂发生机制研究进展[J]. 组织工程与重建外科杂志, 2022, 18(3): 281-. |
[2] | 李圳, 潘丽娜, 胡家安, 徐志红. 142例老年急性肺栓塞患者临床特征分析[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2022, 17(05): 379-384. |
[3] | 蒋天依, 刘福佳, 程雯艳, 赵慧瑾, 沈杨. 重组人血小板生成素治疗急性髓系白血病化疗后血小板减少[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2022, 17(04): 283-288. |
[4] | 章晓炎, 徐静, 璩斌. 血清维生素D水平对老年慢性肾脏病患者肾功能的影响[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2022, 17(04): 307-312. |
[5] | 徐娜娜, 吴涛, 寇明坤, 白海. ASXL1基因突变在急性髓系白血病中的研究进展[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2022, 17(04): 353-355. |
[6] | 罗东凤, 游建华, 李啸扬, 李军民, 张赟翔. 不耐受强化化疗的初治老年急性髓系白血病患者诱导治疗疗效及安全性[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2022, 17(03): 220-226. |
[7] | 李菲卡, 杨文丽, 蒋倩雯, 方芳, 白婷婷, 徐刚, 吴方, 何清. 基于德尔菲专家咨询法构建的老年肌少症评估初始量表[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2022, 17(03): 238-242. |
[8] | 徐琛莹, 李嫣然, 倪晓枫, 徐上妍, 林青. 超声预测老年甲状腺乳头状癌患者颈部淋巴结转移的效能及相关超声征象分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(03): 343-348. |
[9] | 张红, 朱梦梦. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间老年人进食安全护理[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(02): 277-280. |
[10] | 顾伟 孙骏 李志强 卫晓恩. 高活动状态老年人桡骨远端骨折功能预后的影响因素[J]. 组织工程与重建外科杂志, 2021, 17(5): 405-. |
[11] | 孙梅 顾仕贤 王庆宝 曾嵘 毛菇 龚晓毅 郭冬冬 陶莹 陶秀婷. 右美托咪定联合地佐辛在老年患者经皮椎体后凸成形术中的应用 [J]. 组织工程与重建外科杂志, 2021, 17(4): 348-. |
[12] | 孔舒祎 严佳 蒋珏 徐辉. 老年患者口腔肿瘤皮瓣修复术后谵妄的相关危险因素分析 [J]. 组织工程与重建外科杂志, 2021, 17(2): 148-. |
[13] | 王广宇, 杨昕, 张立娟, 谭姣容. 住院新诊断2型糖尿病男性患者血浆总睾酮水平与骨钙素的相关性研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(06): 573-578. |
[14] | 刘安平, 凌枫, 史超, 孙璟. 上海社区老年脑卒中患者跌倒风险因素分析及风险识别模型的建立[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(05): 475-479. |
[15] | 陈梅, 付丛会, 余小萍, 王刚, 徐英. 低强度抗阻训练对高龄患者平衡功能和抑郁状态的疗效观察[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2021, 16(05): 344-348. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||