外科理论与实践 ›› 2018, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (04): 337-341.doi: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2018.04.013

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

开放式补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝(附210例报告)

孟云潇, 陈革, 李绍杰, 胡星辰, 黄磊, 蔡昭, 唐健雄   

  1. 复旦大学附属华东医院普外科 疝和腹壁外科治疗与培训中心,上海 200040
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-25 出版日期:2018-07-25 发布日期:2020-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 唐健雄,E-mail: johnxiong@china.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海申康医院发展中心临床管理优化项目(SHDC 2015620); 上海申康医院发展中心临床科技创新项目(SHDC12016123); 科技部国家重点研发项目(YS2016YF GX010183)

Open mesh ventral incisional hernia repair: a report of 210 cases

MENG Yunxiao, CHEN Ge, LI Shaojie, HU Xingchen, HUANG Lei, CAI Zhao, TANG Jianxiong   

  1. Department of General Sugery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery Center, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Received:2018-06-25 Online:2018-07-25 Published:2020-07-25

摘要: 目的 分析开放式补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析我院于2013年10月至2018年3月行开放式补片修补术的210例腹壁切口疝病人的临床资料。分析不同术式和补片固定方式,术后血清肿、切口感染、补片感染、慢性疼痛、肠漏、复发以及死亡的发生。结果 术后血清肿25例(11.90%),切口感染14例(6.67%),补片感染3例(1.43%),慢性疼痛7例(3.33%),肠漏3例(1.43%),复发7例(3.33%),死亡2例(0.95%)。采用IPOM术式病人术后仅有血清肿并发症发生率低于Sublay术(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义,其余并发症发生和复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Sublay术式中加强法与桥接法术后并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。采用缝线+不可吸收疝钉组与缝线+可吸收疝钉组术后慢性疼痛和复发率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 开放式补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝安全有效。

关键词: 腹壁切口疝, 开放式补片修补, 并发症, 补片固定

Abstract: Objective To analyze the clinical outcome of open mesh repair in treating ventral incisional hernia. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 210 patients with ventral incision hernia who had open mesh repaired from October 2013 to March 2018 in this hospital. The postoperative complications including seroma, incision infection, mesh infection, chronic pain, intestinal fistula, hernia recurrence and mortality were evaluated between 2 repairs [intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) and sublay] and between 2 mesh fix methods. Results After operation, there were 25 cases (11.90%) of seroma, 14 cases (6.67%) of incision infection, 3 cases (1.43%) of mesh infection, 7 cases (3.33%) of chronic pain, 3 cases (1.43%) of intestinal fistula, 7 cases (3.33%) of recurrence and 2 cases(0.95%) of death. The patients with postoperative seroma using IPOM repair were lower than those using Sublay repair(P<0.05) with significant difference. There was no significant difference in other complications and hernia recurrence rate between 2 repairs (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in complications between the patients using reinforcement and bridging after Sublay repair (P>0.05). The case with chronic pain and recurrence rates had no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) using non-absorbable hernia nail when compared those using absorbable hernia nail. Conclusions Open ventral incisional hernia mesh repair is considered as safe and effective.

Key words: Ventral incisional hernia, Open mesh repair, Complication, Mesh fixed

中图分类号: