Efficacy of three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in treatment of obesity

doi:10.16139/j.1007-9610.2023.05.12

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG). Methods Clinical data of 130 patients with obesity who underwent LSG from April 2020 to January 2021 and completed follow-up in time were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into two groups as surgical method, there were 52 cases in three-port group and 78 cases in four-port group. Perioperative indicators and improvement of obesity in two groups were compared. Results All procedures were performed via LSG. Compared with four-port group, the mean operative time of three-port group was shorter [(88.35±22.64) min vs. (98.29±26.25) min, P=0.027]. There were no significant differences in amount of bleeding intraoperative, postoperative pain, postoperative drainage, hospital stay after operation, postoperative complication rate and weight loss 6 months and 2 years after surgery (P>0.05). Conclusions Under the premise of no increase in surgical complications and operative time, three-port LSG can reduce the number and size of surgical scars, which is conducive to skin beauty, and obtain the same weight loss effect as four-port LSG, and can be used as a routine operation for sleeve gastrectomy.

Key words: Obesity, Bariatric surgery, Sleeve gastrectomy, Laparoscopy, Three-port method

CLC Number:

R589.2

ZHAN Chongwen, SHEN Qiwei, SHAO Yikai, XU Bo, HUA Rong, YAO Qiyuan. Efficacy of three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in treatment of obesity[J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2023, 28(05): 463-468.

Figures/Tables 10

Tab 1

Fig 1

Fig2

Fig 3

Tab 2

Tab 3

Tab 4

Tab 5

Tab 6

Table 7

References 17

[1]	中华医学会外科学分会甲状腺及代谢外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会. 中国肥胖及2型糖尿病外科治疗指南(2019版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(4):301-306.
	Thyroid and Metabolism Surgery Group of the Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Guidelines for surgical treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes in China (2019)[J]. Chin J Pract Surg, 2019, 39(4):301-306.
[2]	中国营养学会肥胖防控分会, 中国营养学会临床营养分会, 中华预防医学会行为健康分会, 等. 中国居民肥胖防治专家共识[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2022, 43(5):609-626.
	Chinese Nutrition Society Obesity Prevention and Control Section Chinese Nutrition Society Clinical Nutrition Section, Chinese Preventive Medicine Association Behavioral Health Section, et al. Expert consensus on obesity prevention and treatment in China[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2022, 43(5):609-626.
[3]	GAGLIESE L, WEIZBLIT N, ELLIS W, et al. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients[J]. Pain, 2005, 117(3):412-420. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.004 pmid: 16153776
[4]	LI N, XU B, ZENG J, et al. Development of a new index based on preoperative serum lipocalin 2 to predict post-LSG weight reduction[J]. Obes Surg, 2022, 32(4):1184-1192. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-05916-1 pmid: 35138515
[5]	ANGRISANI L, SANTONICOLA A, IOVINO P, et al. IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures[J]. Obes Surg, 2018, 28(12):3783-3794. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2 pmid: 30121858
[6]	KHIDIR N, GAGNER M, EL MATBOULY M, et al. Single-port sleeve gastrectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year follow-up of weight loss, comorbidity resolution, and cost[J]. Surg Innov, 2020, 27(3):265-271. doi: 10.1177/1553350620902550 pmid: 32008415
[7]	PARK Y, PARK Y S, LEE S, et al. Safety and effectiveness of reduced-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Asian morbidly obese patients[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):23511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02999-1 pmid: 34873253
[8]	MAURIELLO C, CHOUILLARD E, D’ALESSANDRO A, et al. Retrospective comparison of single-port sleeve gastrectomy versus three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score adjustment analysis[J]. Obes Surg, 2018, 28(7):2105-2112. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3244-6
[9]	TRANCHART H, REBIBO L, GAILLARD M, et al. Short-term outcomes of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matched analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(9):3978-3985. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07175-1
[10]	CONSALVO V, SALSANO V, SARNO G, et al. Three-trocar sleeve gastrectomy vs standard five-trocar technique: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Obes Surg, 2017, 27(12):3142-3148. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2760-0 URL
[11]	Pan H M, Liao G S, Lin C H, et al. A practically modified approach with complete posterior mobilization for three-port sleeve gastrectomy: single-center experience[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2022, 32(5):627-630.
[12]	沈佳慧, 杨珵璨, 王文越, 等. 三孔法在腹腔镜胃袖状切除术中的应用[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2018, 23(6):515-518.
	SHEN J H, YANG C C, WANG W Y, et al. Three-port approach for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy[J]. J Surg Concepts Pract, 2018, 23(6):515-518.
[13]	ALHAMBRA-RODRÍGUEZ DE GUZMÁN C, MORANDEIRA-RIVAS A J, HERRERO-BOGAJO M L, et al. Incidence and risk factors of incisional hernia after single-incision endoscopic surgery[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(3):251-255. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0728 URL
[14]	LAINAS P, DERIENNE J, DAMMARO C, et al. Single-port laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of severe obesity: review and perspectives[J]. Obes Surg, 2020, 30(7):2781-2790. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04620-2 pmid: 32318996
[15]	姜海军, 宫轲. 单孔腹腔镜手术进展与未来[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2010, 10(1):37-40.
	JIANG H J, GONG K. Progress and future of single-port laparoscopic surgery[J]. Chin J Min Inv Surg, 2010, 10(1):37-40.
[16]	张丛荣, 张志强, 朱安龙. 腹腔镜手术基本操作原则[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(4):394-396.
	ZHANG C R, ZHANG Z Q, ZHU A L. Basic operating principles of laparoscopic surgery[J]. Chin J Pract Surg, 2019, 39(4):394-396.
[17]	王博方, 马臻, 汪学艳, 等. 腹腔镜下肝脏悬吊方法进展[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2020, 35(2):171-173.
	WANG B F, MA Z, WANG X Y, et al. Progress in techniques for retraction of the liver[J]. Chin J Gen Surg, 2020, 35(2):171-173.

Item	TPLSG (n=52)	FPLSG (n=78)	t(χ²) value	P value
Age (years)	30.02±5.42	28.90±6.77	t=1.000	0.319
Gender （Male/Female）	8/44	29/49	χ²=7.279	0.007
Body mass index (kg/m²)	38.49±6.07	40.29±5.89	t=-1.688	0.094
Waist circumference (cm)	119.61±15.61	126.30±16.08	t=-2.340	0.021
Hip circumference (cm)	123.89±19.73	126.58±12.89	t=-0.935	0.352
Waist-to-hip ratio	1.09±1.04	1.00±0.73	t=0.810	0.42

Item	TPLSG (n=52)	FPLSG (n=78)	t value	P value
Operative time (min)	88.35±22.64	98.29±26.25	-2.234	0.027
Numbers of anastomotic nails	4.96±0.52	5.15±0.51	-2.082	0.039
Intraoperative blood loss (mL)	39.31±20.84	42.14±39.78	-0.39	0.698
Intraoperative complication	0	0

Item	TPLSG (n=52)	FPLSG (n=78)	t value	P value
Pain on operative day(NRS)	2.96±1.60	3.44±2.03	-1.418	0.159
Pain on the first day after surgery (NRS)	2.13±1.37	1.87±1.04	1.242	0.216
Pain on the second day after surgery (NRS)	1.21±0.94	1.29±1.11	-0.447	0.656
Hospital stay after surgery (d)	3.44±1.07	3.63±1.85	-0.656	0.513

Item	TPLSG (n=52)	FPLSG (n=78)	t value	P value
Drainage on operative day (mL)	66.77±48.02	65.40±65.73	0.129	0.897
Drainage on the first day after surgery (mL)	70.15±45.40	83.71±94.90	-0.958	0.34
Drainage on the second day after surgery (mL)	33.29±40.90	37.01±55.31	-0.415	0.678
Total drainage two days after surgery (mL)	170.21±107.74	186.12±183.14	-0.564	0.574

Item	TPLSG (n=52)	FPLSG (n=78)	t(Z) value	P value
Vomit (never/sometimes/ frequently)	31/18/3	45/30/3	Z=-0.115	0.908
Gerd-Q score	6.31±2.27	6.47±2.20	t=-0.115	0.909
Wound complications	0	0