当代外语研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (09): 44-48.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.09.008

• 语用学专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

广告模糊语误导的社会心理机制:批评语用分析

钱永红   

  1. 南京审计学院外国语学院,南京,211815
  • 出版日期:2015-09-28 发布日期:2020-07-25
  • 作者简介:钱永红,南京审计学院外国语学院副教授。主要研究方向为语用学、外语教学。电子邮箱:janetqian_3@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    *本文为2014年度江苏省社会科学基金课题青年项目“语言表达的能产性与限制性研究:以汉语复杂谓词为例”(编号14YYC004)及2014年度江苏高校哲学社会研究指导项目“非法电视直销广告中的模糊话语研究:批评语用学视角”(编号2014SJD147)的阶段性成果;并得到江苏省政府留学奖学金资助及南京审计学院人事处师资培养基金项目资助。

Socio-psychological Mechanism Underlying Misleading Vague Language in Advertisements: A Critical Pragmatic Analysis

QIAN Yonghong   

  • Online:2015-09-28 Published:2020-07-25

摘要: 以往研究虽然指出了广告中某些模糊语的潜在误导性,但是却未能对其赖以运作的社会心理机制进行探讨。鉴于此,本研究采用受众调查与访谈的方法,在批评语用学框架内考察误导性模糊话语所顺应的社会心理因素,开展相关话语实践的批评语用分析。研究表明,电视直销广告商往往善于掌握消费者的迷信科技与权威心理、求廉、求奇心理和从众心理等相关心理因素,利用模糊话语的模糊属性来对相关心理进行负面的顺应,从而顺利地达到误导消费者的目的。该研究成果可为政府部门对电视广告话语的监管和规范提供一定参考。

关键词: 模糊话语, 负顺应, 社会心理机制, 批评语用分析

Abstract: Previous studies of advertisements revealed the potentially misleading or deceptive effect of vague language used in advertisements, but failed to explore the socio-psychological mechanism behind the use of misleading or deceptive vague discourse. In view of this research gap, the present study, adopting the methods of audience survey and interview, aims to investigate the socio-psychological factors adapted to by advertisers in the use of misleading vague discourse within the framework of critical pragmatics. The analysis shows that TV shopping advertisers tend to focus on prospective customers’ psychological tendencies (such as blind belief in high technology and authority, pursuit of cheapness and novelty, crowd mentality, etc.) and adapt negatively to those mentalities in the use of vague discourses so as to mislead the customers into buying their products. This study could provide some reference for the government departments concerned in their supervision and management of the TV advertising programs.

中图分类号: