明托金字塔原理在英语学术演讲教学中的应用研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.05.005

当代外语研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05): 27-33.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.05.005

明托金字塔原理在英语学术演讲教学中的应用研究

彭阳辉, 王同顺, 邹晖

上海交通大学,上海,200240

出版日期:2017-09-28 发布日期:2020-07-25
作者简介:彭阳辉,上海交通大学外国语学院副教授。主要研究方向为英语语言文学与文化。电子邮箱:pengyanghui@sjtu.edu.cn
王同顺,上海交通大学外国语学院教授。主要研究方向为第二语言习得。电子邮箱:tswang@sjtu.edu.cn
邹晖,上海交通大学外国语学院讲师。主要研究方向为语言测试。电子邮箱:zouhui@sjtu.edu.cn

The Application of Minto Pyramid to the Teaching of English Academic Presentation Courses by PENG Yanghui

WANG Tongshun, ZOU Hui

Online:2017-09-28 Published:2020-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 明托金字塔原理是芭芭拉·明托提出的关于篇章组织的写作理念。通过使用金字塔结构,作者可以运用问题-解决模板完成引言部分和主体写作并概括杂乱的内容。本文讨论了如何将明托金字塔原理引入英语学术演讲课程来解决学生演讲中存在的突出问题,其中包括题目不恰当、结构松散导致重点不突出、主旨信息不够高度概括和准确。将教学干预前后两次演讲大纲作为语料进行分析和评阅,并用SPSS对评阅分数进行了分析处理,数据表明明托金字塔原理对以上问题的改善有显著的作用。在目前英语学术演讲教材和文献匮乏的状况下,金字塔原理提供了非常实用的模板和检测依据,易于在短时间内学习和操作, 对于英语学术演讲具有重大的价值。

关键词: 金字塔原理, 英语学术演讲, 演讲大纲写作

Abstract: Minto Pyramid, proposed by Barbara Minto, is a way to organize the overall structure of a writing. Through the use of a pyramid structure, writers can introduce the subject matter and complete the body part with a question-solution template and effectively summarize the grouping of ideas. This paper discusses the incorporation of Minto Pyramid into English academic presentation course, thus solving some of the obvious problems students have, including inadequate topics, loose structure and less concise summary statements. Two outlines,written by the same group of students before and after the teacher's intervention, are analyzed and rated. The data processed by SPSS indicates the remarkable effect of Minto Pyramid on teaching. Currently when textbooks and documentation on English academic presentation are in great shortage, Minto Pyramid is of great value, which is easy to learn and practice as it offers practical templates and testing principles.

中图分类号:

H319

彭阳辉, 王同顺, 邹晖. 明托金字塔原理在英语学术演讲教学中的应用研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(05): 27-33.

WANG Tongshun, ZOU Hui. The Application of Minto Pyramid to the Teaching of English Academic Presentation Courses by PENG Yanghui[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(05): 27-33.

参考文献

Brindley, G. & S. Ross. 2014. EAP assessment: Issues, models, and outcomes [A]. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (eds.). Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purpose [C]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press & Cambridge University Press. 148-166
Decker, B.A. 2003. Good speech is worth a thousand written words [A]. In D.F. Beer (ed.). Writing and Speaking in the Technology Professions [C]. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience + IEEE Press. 293-298.
Ealey, T. 2003. Presenting the successful technical seminar [A]. In D.F. Beer (ed.). Writing and Speaking in the Technology Professions [C]. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience + IEEE Press. 333-335.
Hamp-Lyons, L. & B.W. Zhang. 2014. World Englishes: issues in and from academic writing assessment [A]. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (eds.). Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purpose [C]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press & Cambridge University Press. 101-116
Hyland, K. & P. Shaw. 2016. The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purpose [M]. London & New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Lucas, S.E. 2008. The Art of Public Speaking [M]. New York: McGrow-Hill Higher Education.
McGrow-Hill. 2009. Public Speaking [M]. London:McGrow-Hill Education.
Minto, B. 2003. The Minto Pyramid Principle: Logic in Writing, Thinking and Problem Solving [M]. London: Minto International.
Seligmann, J. 2012. Academic Literacy for Education Students [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press Southern Africa.
Silyn-Roberts, H. 2013. Writing for Science and Engineering - Papers, Presentations and Reports [OL] [2016-11-06]. https://app.knovel.com/web/toc.v/cid:kpWSEPPRE1/viewerType:toc/root_slug:writing-for-science.
Warlum, M.F. 2003. Improving oral marketing presentations in the technology-based company [A]. In D.F. Beer (ed.). Writing and Speaking in the Technology Professions [C]. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience + IEEE Press. 304-307.
贾萌. 2014. 金字塔原理:思考表达和解决问题的逻辑[OL]. [2017-01-18]. http://talk.ifeng.com/topic/special/jiameng/detail_2014_08/01/37704575_0.shtml.
郎瑞萍、叶会昌. 2014. 妙用金字塔原理,科学搭建文章结构[J]. 河北北方学院学报(5):105-107
赵鸿雁、王冬燕、杨惠玉、李晓红. 2014. 学术交流英语口语[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社.
祝蔚红. 2007. 实用英语演讲教程[M]. 南京:南京大学出版社.

[1]	徐斌. 高校外语课程思政中的国家意识培育[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 35-41.
[2]	苗兴伟. 新文科背景下师范类院校外语专业人才培养体系建设[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 72-81.
[3]	屈文生. 新文科理念下的新时代高等外语教育意象——以“大外语”等命题为中心[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 82-91.
[4]	常辉. 新文科背景下上海交通大学英语专业改革与人才培养探索[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 92-96.
[5]	纪秀明, 曾春葙. 新文科视域下外语学科改革的几个平衡点与适度性问题[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 97-102.
[6]	徐鹰, 毕宇, 章雅青. 《词汇和专门用途英语研究:定量和定性视角》评介[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 104-108.
[7]	郭鸿杰, 张达球, 丁冬. 一体三通,融创合一:新文科背景下财经类高校外语人才培养模式创新[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 35-44.
[8]	潘海英, 刘淑玲. 新文科建设背景下大学外语课程创新发展的若干思考[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 45-52.
[9]	马炳军, 常辉. 汉语二语句法加工研究:理论与实验[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 61-70.
[10]	陶继芬. POA“读说”模式英语口语课堂教学设计[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 96-103.
[11]	李建波, 张格堃. 文化观念和文学典籍交相辉映——《文化观念流变中的英国文学典籍研究》评述[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 106-110.
[12]	田秘, 赵永峰. 概念整合理论的批评认知语言学阐释——以“the *ly challenged”委婉构式为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 84-95.
[13]	杨港, 彭楠. 数字时代高校外语教材研究的自传式叙事范式[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 96-105.
[14]	黄立鹤. 多模态范式与后疫情时代的外语教学[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 451(1): 75-85.
[15]	郑咏滟. 后疫情时代的多语研究:反思与展望[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 451(1): 64-74.

明托金字塔原理在英语学术演讲教学中的应用研究

The Application of Minto Pyramid to the Teaching of English Academic Presentation Courses by PENG Yanghui

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价