从四大理论/教学框架看任务教学研究的发展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.07.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在过去三十余年时间里,国际第二语言研究界对任务教学倾注了极高的热情,但不同时期的研究关注点有很大的不同,彰显了二语习得理论的发展。本文将对出现在不同时期的四大任务教学理论/教学框架做一综述性讨论,回溯整体二语习得研究及任务教学研究的发展轨迹,并吸引更多的研究者关注这一领域,推进相关研究的发展。

关键词: 任务教学研究, 第二语言习得研究

Abstract: This article traces the development in task-based language teaching research over the past thirty years by discussing the four influential theoretical and pedagogical frameworks developed at different times and around different parameters of task-based language teaching. The four frameworks, put together, provide us a trace of the historical path that task-based language teaching has evolved over the past thirty years and mirrors the overall advancement of second language acquisition research.

中图分类号:

H319

袁芳远. 从四大理论/教学框架看任务教学研究的发展[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(07): 40-46.

YUAN Fangyuan. Four Theoretical/Pedagogical Frameworks and Task-based Language Teaching Research[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 40-46.

参考文献

Berwick, R. 1990. Task Variation and Repair in English as a Foreign Language [M]. Lobe University of Commerce: Institute of Economic Research.
Burrows, C. 2008. Socio-cultural barriers facing TBL in Japan [J]. The Language Teacher 3(8): 15-19.
Carless, D. 2002. Implementing task-based learning with young learners [J]. ELT Journal 56: 389-96.
Duff, P. 1986. Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task [A]. In R.R. Day (ed.). Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition [C]. Rowley: Newbury House. 147-81.
Ellis, R. 2003. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. 2005. Analyzing Learner Language [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foster, P. 1998. A classroom perspective on negotiation of meaning [J]. Applied Linguistics 19(1): 1-23.
Iwashita, N. 2001. The effect of learner proficiency on corrective feedback and modified output in nonnative-nonnative interaction [J]. System 29(2): 267-87.
Kumaravadivelu, B. 1994. The postmethod condition: Emerging strategies for second/foreign language teaching [J]. TESOL Quarterly 28: 27-48.
Kumaravadivelu, B. 2006. TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends [J]. TESOL Quarterly 40(1): 59-81.
Long, M. 1980. Input, Interaction and Second Language Acquisition [D]. Los Angeles: University of California.
Long, M. 1985. The role of instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching [A]. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (eds.). Modeling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition [C]. San Diego: College-Hill Press. 77-99.
Long, M. 1989. Second language research: Some implications for methodology and class size in teaching Japanese [J]. AJALT Journal 12: 22-31.
Loschky, L.1989. The Effects of Negotiated Interaction and Premodified Input on Second Language Comprehension and retention [R]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of English as a Second Language.
Newton, J. 1991. Negotiation: Negotiating what? [R]. Singapore: SEAMEO Conference on Language Acquisition and Second/Foreign Language Classroom.
Pica, T. 1991. Classroom interaction, participation and comprehension: Redefining relationships [J]. System 19: 437-52.
Pica, T. 1993. Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction [A]. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (eds.). Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice [C]. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 9-34.
Pica, T. & C. Doughty. 1985. Non-native speaker interaction in the ESL classroom [A]. In S. Gass & C. Madden (eds.). Input in Second Language Acquisition [C]. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 115-32.
Plough, I. & S. Gass. 1993. Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure [A]. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (eds.). Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice [C]. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters. 35-56.
Prabhu, N. S. 1987. Second Language Pedagogy[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, J. C. 2002. Accuracy and fluency revisited[J]. New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms: 35-50.
Robinson, P. 2009. Task complexity, cognitive resources and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA [A]. In Kris Van den Branden, M. Bygate & J. Norris (eds.). Task-based Language Teaching: A Reader [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 193-226.
Sato, R. 2009. Suggestions for Creating teaching approaches suitable to the Japanese EFL environment [J]. The Language Teacher 33(9): 11-14.
Seedhouse, P. 1999. Task-based interaction [J]. ELT Journal 53(3): 149-56.
Skehan, P. 1996. A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction [J]. Applied Linguistics 17: 38-62.
Skehan, P. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. 2001. Tasks and language performance assessment [A]. In Bygate, M. P. Skehan & M. Swain (eds.). Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing [C]. Harlow: Longman. 167-85.
Skehan, P. & P. Foster. 1997. Task type and processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance [J]. Language Teaching Research 1(3): 185-211.
Storch, N. 2002. Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work [J]. Language Learning 52(1): 119-58.
Swain, M., S. Lapkin, I. Knouzi, W. Suzuki & L. Brooks. 2009. Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French [J]. The Modern Language Journal 93(1): 5-29.
Swan, M. 2005. Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction [J]. Applied Linguistics 26(3): 376-401.
Willis, J. 1996. A Framework for Task-based Learning [M]. Harlow: Longman Pearson Education.
Yuan, F. 2009. Measuring learner language of L2 Chinese in fluency, accuracy, and complexity [J]. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 44(3): 109-30.
Yuan, F. 2012. Effects of consciousness on ‘LE’ in L2 Chinese—A pilot study in a classroom setting. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 47(3): 65-90.
Yuan, F. 2014. Focused dictogloss, peer collaboration, and guided reconstruction—A case of time expressions in L2 Chinese [A]. In N. Jiang (ed.). Advances in Chinese as a Second Language: Acquisition and Processing [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars. 133-51.
Yuan, F. & R. Ellis. 2003. The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production [J]. Applied Linguistics 24(1): 1-27.
Yule, G. & D. MacDonald. 1990. Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role [J]. Language Learning 40(4): 539-56.
Zuengler, J. 1993. Encouraging learners’ conversational participation: The effect of content knowledge [J]. Language Learning 43: 403-32.

[1]	徐斌. 高校外语课程思政中的国家意识培育[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 35-41.
[2]	苗兴伟. 新文科背景下师范类院校外语专业人才培养体系建设[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 72-81.
[3]	屈文生. 新文科理念下的新时代高等外语教育意象——以“大外语”等命题为中心[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 82-91.
[4]	常辉. 新文科背景下上海交通大学英语专业改革与人才培养探索[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 92-96.
[5]	纪秀明, 曾春葙. 新文科视域下外语学科改革的几个平衡点与适度性问题[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 97-102.
[6]	徐鹰, 毕宇, 章雅青. 《词汇和专门用途英语研究:定量和定性视角》评介[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 104-108.
[7]	郭鸿杰, 张达球, 丁冬. 一体三通,融创合一:新文科背景下财经类高校外语人才培养模式创新[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 35-44.
[8]	潘海英, 刘淑玲. 新文科建设背景下大学外语课程创新发展的若干思考[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 45-52.
[9]	马炳军, 常辉. 汉语二语句法加工研究:理论与实验[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 61-70.
[10]	陶继芬. POA“读说”模式英语口语课堂教学设计[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 96-103.
[11]	李建波, 张格堃. 文化观念和文学典籍交相辉映——《文化观念流变中的英国文学典籍研究》评述[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 106-110.
[12]	田秘, 赵永峰. 概念整合理论的批评认知语言学阐释——以“the *ly challenged”委婉构式为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 84-95.
[13]	杨港, 彭楠. 数字时代高校外语教材研究的自传式叙事范式[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 96-105.
[14]	黄立鹤. 多模态范式与后疫情时代的外语教学[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 451(1): 75-85.
[15]	郑咏滟. 后疫情时代的多语研究:反思与展望[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 451(1): 64-74.