大学英语教学,为什么要坚守“阅读和讨论”?

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2018.02.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 外语教学中的“阅读和讨论”的模式,就是要创造一个“社会的”或者说“交际的”语境,让学生在这个语境里接触和使用外语,在与他人互动中进行意义交流。以“阅读和讨论”为核心的英语教学模式重点训练了学生阅读、写作和口头表达这三种重要的语言技能,实则上是让学生通过不断地阅读、写作和练习口头表达来提高外语能力。同时,“阅读和讨论”的外语教学模式还有利于提高学生学习动机,进行深入学习,提高隐性学习能力,把语言知识内化。

关键词: 大学英语, 教学法, 阅读和讨论, 写作

Abstract: In foreign language (FL) teaching, the “reading for discussion” model aims to provide the learners with social contexts where they are exposed to and learn to use FL to transmit meaning in oral interaction with others. In this model the learners are wainly trained with three language skills, i.e. reading, writing, and speaking. By gaining practices in reading, writing, and speaking, students are given opportunities to make significant improvements in their levels of foreign language proficiency. In addition, the “reading for discussion”model helps improve students' language learning motivation and offers the added benefit of processing the foreign language more deeply and internalizing their knowledge through implicit learning.

中图分类号:

H319

吴诗玉, 黄绍强. 大学英语教学,为什么要坚守“阅读和讨论”?[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(02): 9-14.

WU Shiyu, HUANG Shaoqiang. College English Instruction, Why Hold onto the “Reading for Discussion” Model?[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2018, 18(02): 9-14.

参考文献

Amelia, L. & R. Berthele. 2015. Age and Foreign Language Learning in School [M]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Anderson, N.J. 1999. Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies [M]. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Belcher, D.D. & A.R. Hirvela (eds.). 2003. Linking Literacies: Perspectives on L2 Reading-Writing Connections [C]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Brinton, D.M., Snow, M.A. & M.B. Wesche. 1989. Content-based Second Language Instruction [M]. New York: Newbury House.
Brookfield, S.D. & S. Preskill. 1999. Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davis, B.G. 1993. Tools for Teaching [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
de Graaf, R. & A. Housen. 2009. Investigating effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction [A]. In M.H. Long & C. Doughty (eds.). Blackwell Handbook of Language Teaching [C]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 726-753.
DeKeyser, R.M. 2014. Age effects in second language learning [A]. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. London & New York: Routledge. 442-460.
Dörnyei, Z. 2009. The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elley, W.B. & F. Mangubhai. 1983. The impact of reading on second language learning [J]. Reading Research Quarterly 19: 53-67.
Fears, J.R. 2008. Famous Greeks [M]. Virginia: The Teaching Company.
Gass, S. & A. Mackey. 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [M]. London & New York: Routledge.
Grabe, W. & F. Stoller. 1997. Reading and vocabulary development in a second language: A case study [A]. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (eds.). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 98-123.
Hutchins, R.M. 1936. The Higher Learning in America [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S.D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications [M]. London: Longman.
Krashen, S. & S.Y. Lee. 2004. Competence in foreign language writing: Progress and lacunae [J]. Literacy Across Cultures 12(2):10-14.
Lantolf, J.P. 2006. Sociocultural theory and second language development: State-of-the-art [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(1):67-109.
Nation, P. 2006. How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? [J] Canadian Modern Language Review 63:59-82.
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. 2006. Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An Eye-tracking study [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38:97-130.
Pigada, M. & N. Schmitt. 2006. Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study [J]. Reading in a Foreign Language 18:1-28.
Robinson, P. 2003. The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning [J]. Second Language Studies 21:45-105.
Stotsky, S. 1983. Research on reading/writing relationships: A synthesis and suggested directions [J]. Language Arts 5:627-642.
Tarone, E. 2015. Second language acquisition in applied linguistics: 1925-2015 and beyond [J]. Applied Linguistics 4:444-453.
Vygotsky, L.S. 1986. Thought and Language [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Webb, S. 2005. Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effect of reading and writing on word knowledge [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27:33-52.
West, R., Stanovich, K. & H. Mitchell. 1993. Reading in the real world and its correlates [J]. Reading Research Quarterly 28:35-48.
Wu, S. 2016. The Use of L1 Cognitive Resources in L2 Reading by Chinese EFL Learners [M]. London & New York: Routledge.
Zhang, L.J. 2000. Metacognition in L2 reading literacy acquisition: The case of ten Chinese students learning to read EFL [A]. In A. Brown (ed.). English in Southeast Asia: Developing Multiliteracies [C]. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. 83-96.
甘阳. 2007. 大学人文教育的理念、目标与模式[A]. 中国大学的人文教育(载甘阳、陈来、苏力)[C]. 北京:三联书店. 3-40.
李曼丽、汪永铨. 1999. 关于“通识教育”概念内涵的讨论[J]. 清华大学教育研究(1):99-104.
马拯. 2017. 任务教学法研究30年:回顾与启示[J]. 西安外国语大学学报(1):67-71.
秦秀白. 2012. 警惕课堂教学娱乐化[J]. 当代外语研究(7):1-3.
孙有中. 2011. 突出思辨能力培养,将英语专业教学改革引向深入[J]. 中国外语(3):49-58.
吴诗玉. 2013. 探讨大学英语教学“命运”的多种可能[J]. 中国大学教学(11):37-43.
吴诗玉、马拯. 2012. 中国学习者外语故事理解中心理表征建构过程及管理[J]. 现代外语(3):278-285.
吴诗玉、张宇英、胡青青. 2017. 第二语言阅读“熔断”假说的认知心理证据:在线篇章处理的范式[J]. 心理学报(3):285-295.
杨枫、吴诗玉. 2013. 大学英语教学通识化转向的“逻各斯”[J]. 外语电化教学(1):9-14.
章兼中、陈岑、姜丹. 2016. 国外外语教学法主要流派[M]. 福州:福建教育出版社.

[1]	张荔. 基于产出导向法的学术英语写作与演讲教学[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 446(2): 61-71.
[2]	郭英剑;. 自媒体时代文学研究的价值意义[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(03): 46-51.
[3]	. 上海交通大学外国语学院概况[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(03): 129-.
[4]	刘兴华;. 英语写作教学的循证实践[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(01): 68-76.
[5]	冯一梅, 陈小丽, 张曦,. 国内诊断学PBL教学法对临床医学生学习效果影响的荟萃分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(05): 595-601.
[6]	宋英, 何高大. 应用型高校大学英语“金课”打造之探索[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(05): 32-41.
[7]	胡佳佳, 张淼, 苗莹, 陈刚,. 影像医学教学案例库建设[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(04): 484-486.
[8]	娄宝翠, 王亚丽. 学习者英语学术写作介入标记语使用特征[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(04): 58-69.
[9]	蔡基刚. 外语教学、二语教学、国际通用语教学？关于英语教学“一条龙”外语教育模式[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(04): 70-77.
[10]	邬易平. 大学英语描写文写作体验式教学行动研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(04): 78-88.
[11]	李冰. 大学英语阅读教学中的思辨能力培养——以《融合大学英语》为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(04): 89-96.
[12]	刘兴华, 童剑平. 应用型本科院校通用大学英语教材适切性调查[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(04): 97-105.
[13]	梁璆荔, 姜晓星, 陈宁, 吴洁敏, 李莉, 刘湘帆, 倪培华,. 基于团队学习的教学法在分子生物学检验技术实验教学中的探索及应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(03): 371-373.
[14]	刘芝翠, 潘萌,. 基于团队学习的教学法在皮肤科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(03): 368-370.
[15]	俞理明. “大学英语”不是“公共英语”的另一种说法——对全球化语境下的大学英语教学的一点思考[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(02): 5-7.