动脉自旋标记磁共振灌注技术结合磁共振血管成像预测后循环脑梗死患者病情进展中的应用

doi:10.16150/j.1671-2870.2019.04.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的： 探讨动脉自旋标记（anerial spin labeling,ASL）磁共振灌注技术结合磁共振血管成像（magnetic reso-nance angiography,MRA）在预测后循环脑梗死（posterior circulation ischemia,PCI）患者病情进展中的作用。方法： 根据入院72 h后美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表（National Institute of Health stroke scale,NIHSS）评分是否增加≥3分（作为病情进展标准）,将57例PCI患者分为进展组和对照组,对患者行脑部MRI的T1加权、T2加权、FLARE、MRA、弥散加权成像（diffusion weighted imaging,DWI）、ASL序列扫描,并进行后循环急性卒中预后早期CT量表（posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score,pc-ASPECTS）评分,计算相对脑血流（relative cerebral blood flow,rCBF）值,记录颅内大动脉狭窄程度。比较进展组与对照组间的ASL参数及其他指标差异,并对有差异的数据进行多因素Logistic回归分析。结果： 对照组的rCBF值明显高于进展组（1.25±0.37比0.69±0.19,P<0.05）,其pc-ASPECT评分也显著高于进展组[（8.21±0.74）分比（7.69±0.93）分,P<0.05],但rCBF值与pc-ASPECTS间无相关性。进展组患者的大动脉狭窄发现率（根据MRA结果）高于对照组（82.76%比35.71% P<0.05）,且rCBF值与大动脉狭窄率相关,但10例大动脉狭窄者的rCBF值并未降低。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,只有高rCBF值（OR=3.703,95%CI为1.971~6.956）是PCI病情进展的保护因素（P<0.05）,受试者工作特征曲线显示,rCBF值≥1.014的PCI患者的预后较好,即72 h内疾病无进展。结论： 高rCBF值是PCI病情进展的保护因素。对于PCI患者,pc-ASPECT评分、MRA大动脉狭窄率都可能无法全面反映疾病的短期进展,故行MRI、MRA检查并结合ASL检测rCBF值,可更好地预测PCI的早期病情进展。

关键词: 后循环脑梗死, 动脉自旋标记, 磁共振血管成像

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the application of arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance perfusion imaging (MRI-ASL) combined with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for predicting the progress of PCI stroke. Methods: According to whether there was an increase of ≥3 scores of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) 72 hours after admission, 57 patients with acute posterior circulation ischemic stroke were divided into progressive group (n=29) and control group (n=28). All patients were examined with standard magnetic resonance scans (T1WI、T2WI、T2-FLAIR), MRA, diffusion weighted imaging(DWI) and MRI-ASL. The patients were also evaluated with the posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score(pc-ASPECTS). Relative cerebral blood flow（rCBF） and degree of main arterial stenosis were recorded. The differences of these parameters between progressive group and control group were measured, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on parameters with significant differences. Results: The rCBF [（1.25±0.37） vs. (0.69±0.19), P<0.05] and pc-ASPECTS [（8.21±0.74） vs. (7.69±0.93), P<0.05] in control group were significantly higher than those in progressive group, however, there was no correlation between rCBF and pc-ASPECTS. The main arterial stenosis rate in progressive group were significantly higher than that in control group (82.76% vs. 35.71%, P<0.05), and rCBF was correlated with main arterial stenosis rate. However, the rCBF of 10 cases with main arterial stenosis was not decreased. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only rCBF （OR=3.703, 95%CI 1.971-6.956） was the protective factor of progression of PCI stroke. ROC curve analysis indicated that rCBF（≥1.014） predicted good prognosis. Conclusions: High rCBF is a protective factor of progreesion of PCI. For PCI patients, pc-ASPECT score, MRA detected main arterial stenosis rate could not comprehensively reflect the short term progression of the disease; MRI, MRA combined with MRI-ASL detecting the rCBE could more effectively predicting the progression of early stage PCT.

Key words: Posterior circulation ischemic stroke, Arterial spin labeling, Magnetic resonance angiography

中图分类号:

R743.3

赵宗波, 贾传海, 刘晖. 动脉自旋标记磁共振灌注技术结合磁共振血管成像预测后循环脑梗死患者病情进展中的应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(04): 412-417.

ZHAO Zongbo, JIA Chuanhai, LIU Hui. Application of arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance perfusion imaging (MRI-ASL) combined with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the prediction of progress of posterior circulation ischemic (PCI) stroke[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(04): 412-417.

图/表 5

图1

图2

表1

图3

表2

参考文献 20

[1]	van der Hoeven EJ, Dankbaar JW, Algra A, et al. Additional diagnostic value of computed tomography perfusion for detection of acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation[J]. Stroke, 2015, 46(4):1113-1115. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008718 pmid: 25744516
[2]	王勤鹰, 余敏, 顾勤, 等. 后循环脑梗死预后的临床与影像分析[J]. 神经病学与神经康复学杂志, 2014, 11(1):6-10.
[3]	Tao WD, Kong FY, Hao ZL, et al. One-year case fatality and disability after posterior circulation infarction in a Chinese hospital-based stroke study[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2010, 29(4):376-381. doi: 10.1159/000281836 URL
[4]	Khatibi K, Nour M, Tateshima S, et al. Posterior Circulation Thrombectomy-pc-ASPECT Score Applied to Preintervention Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Accurately Predict Functional Outcome[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 129:566-571. doi: S1878-8750(19)31494-9 pmid: 31158539
[5]	蒋中灿, 李江鸿, 靳笑颜. DWI和MRA联合应用诊断急性期脑梗死的研究[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2018, 35(5)544-546.
[6]	中国卒中学会, 中国卒中学会神经介入分会, 中华预防医学会卒中预防与控制专业委员会介入学组. 急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗中国指南2018[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2018, 13(7):706-729.
[7]	Tei H, Uchiyama S, Usui T, et al. Posterior circulation ASPECTS on diffusion-weighted MRI can be a powerful marker for predicting functional outcome[J]. J Neurol, 2010, 257(5):767-773. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-5406-x URL
[8]	金灿, 王苇. ASPECT评分的临床应用进展[J]. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2015, 38(5):418-422.
[9]	崔碧霄, 卢洁. 脑血流定量的影像学研究进展[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2019, 21(5):555-556.
[10]	王敏, 王宝军, 刘国荣, 等. 磁共振动脉自旋标记灌注成像技术及其评价缺血性卒中患者脑血流灌注的研究进展[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2013, 10(5):277-280.
[11]	张慧勤, 李明利. 动脉自旋标记磁共振灌注技术在脑血管病中的应用进展[J]. 磁共振成像, 2017, 8(12):934-940.
[12]	曹树刚, 徐文安. 进展性卒中的神经影像学预测因素[J]. 国际脑血管病杂志, 2012, 20(4):300-304.
[13]	王丹, 刘伟, 胡月新, 等. 后循环脑梗死危险因素的临床分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2016, 38(8):893-896.
[14]	樊会军, 杜金明, 律静. 磁共振弥散加权成像联合磁共振血管成像诊断急性期脑梗死的临床价值[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2018, 17(9):979-982.
[15]	宋懿红, 李国忠. 颅内灌注减低对缺血性进展性卒中的预测价值[J]. 临床神经病学杂志, 2017, 30(1):67-68.
[16]	李琦, 李昱仑, 杨文松, 等. 平扫CT征象预测脑出血血肿扩大与预后的研究现状[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2018, 17(4):363-367.
[17]	武亚男, 赵江明. 趋化因子MIF CCL23与急性脑梗死相关性研究[J]. 安徽医学, 2019, 40(5):535-537.
[18]	Puetz V, Khomenko A, Hill MD, et al. Extent of hypoattenuation on CT angiography source images in basilar artery occlusion: prognostic value in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(12):3454-3459. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.622175 URL
[19]	Sugimori H, Fujima N, Suzuki Y, et al. Evaluation of cerebral blood flow using multi-phase pseudo continuous arterial spin labeling at 3-tesla[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 33(10):1338-1344. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.07.016 URL
[20]	Martin SZ, Madai VI, von Samson-Himmelstjerna FC, et al. 3D GRASE pulsed arterial spin labeling at multiple inflow times in patients with long arterial transit times: comparison with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI at 3 Tesla[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2015, 35(3):392-401. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.200 URL

影响因素	进展组（n=29）	对照组（n=28）	t值或 χ²值	P值
年龄（岁）	69.61±10.29	68.65±9.25	1.125	0.052
男性	16（55.2%）	15（53.6%）	0.019	0.557
吸烟	18（62.1%）	20（71.4%）	0.562	0.576
饮酒	8（27.6%）	10（35.7%）	0.436	0.576
糖尿病	11（37.9%）	14（50.0%）	0.843	0.429
高血压	20（68.9%）	24（85.7%）	2.270	0.207
冠心病	10（34.5%）	12（42.9%）	0.442	0.592
大动脉狭窄	24（82.76%）	10（35.71%）	13.099	<0.001
rCBF值	0.69±0.19	1.25±0.37	-5.832	<0.001
pc-ASPECTS	7.69±0.93	8.21±0.74	-2.354	0.022
入院时NIHSS评分 72 h NIHSS评分	6.00±3.38 11.33±1.71	6.61±3.84 8.41±0.29	-0.634 2.254	0.529 0.027

影响因素	回归系数	P值	OR值	95%CI
rCBF值	4.789	0.010	3.703	1.971~6.956
大动脉狭窄	-2.206	0.101	0.110	0.008~1.542
pc-ASPECTS	0.798	0.338	2.221	0.434~11.364