诊断学理论与实践 ›› 2020, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03): 243-247.doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2020.03.008
陈小英, 郑捷
收稿日期:
2020-03-02
出版日期:
2020-06-25
发布日期:
2020-06-25
通讯作者:
郑捷
基金资助:
CHEN Xiaoying, ZHENG Jie
Received:
2020-03-02
Online:
2020-06-25
Published:
2020-06-25
Contact:
ZHENG Jie
摘要:
目的: 观察自建胫前黏液性水肿(pretibial myxedema, PTM)严重程度和活动度评分量表在PTM临床量化评估中的应用价值,采用超声测量皮损真皮厚度,并检测血清促甲状腺激素受体抗体(thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibody, TRAb)水平,以验证量表的临床价值。方法: 参照温哥华瘢痕评定量表和PTM皮损分期,建立胫前黏液性水肿严重程度和活动度评分量表。2015年1月至2018年12月期间,收集上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院皮肤科诊断为PTM的患者40例,根据其皮损临床表现,进行PTM严重程度和活动度评分,进一步分析该评分与患者血清TRAb水平、超声测量皮损真皮厚度间的相关性。结果: 对40例患者进行PTM严重程度和活动度评分,最高者为11分,最低者为3分,平均分为(7.2±1.9)分。所有患者的血清TRAb水平均高于正常值参考范围(<1.75 IU/L),其中31例(77.5%)>40 IU/L,7例(17.5%)在30~40 IU/L之间,2例(5.0%)在20~30 IU/L之间。经超声测量患者的皮损真皮厚度为4.2~10.4 mm,平均厚度为(6.4±1.6) mm。Spearman相关分析表明,PTM严重程度及活动度评分与血清TRAb水平、超声测量皮损真皮厚度呈正相关(r=0.616,r=0.680,P均<0.05)。结论: PTM严重程度和活动度评分量表有良好的临床量化评估PTM严重程度、活动度的价值,其与患者的血清TRAb水平、超声测量皮损真皮厚度呈正相关。
中图分类号:
陈小英, 郑捷. 胫前黏液性水肿严重程度和活动度评分量表的建立及实验室、超声相关指标的验证[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(03): 243-247.
CHEN Xiaoying, ZHENG Jie. Establishment of pretibial myxedema severity and activity rating scale and validation with ultrasonic and laboratory measurements[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2020, 19(03): 243-247.
[1] | Fatourechi V. Pretibial myxedema: pathophysiology and treatment options[J]. Am J ClinDermatol, 2005, 6(5):295-309. |
[2] |
Kleinerman R, Whang TB, Bard RL, et al. Ultrasound in dermatology: principles and applications[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2012, 67(3):478-487.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.12.016 pmid: 22285673 |
[3] |
Rallan D, Harland CC. Ultrasound in dermatology--basic principles and applications[J]. Clin Exp Dermatol, 2003, 28(6):632-638.
pmid: 14616832 |
[4] |
Smith TJ, Hegedüs L. Graves' disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 375(16):1552-1565.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510030 URL |
[5] | Lan C, Wang Y, Zeng X, et al. Morphological diversity of pretibial myxedema and its mechanism of evolving process and outcome: A retrospective study of 216 cases[J]. J Thyroid Res, 2016, 2016:2652174. |
[6] |
Baryza MJ, Baryza GA. The vancouver scar scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability[J]. J Burn Care Rehabil, 1995, 16(5):535-538.
pmid: 8537427 |
[7] |
Jang SY, Shin DY, Lee EJ, et al. Clinical characteristics of Graves' orbitopathy in patients showing discrepancy between levels from TBII assays and TSI bioassay[J]. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 2014, 80(4):591-597.
doi: 10.1111/cen.12318 URL |
[8] |
Shih SR, Lin MS, Li HY, et al. Observing pretibial myxedema in patients with Graves' disease using digital infrared thermal imaging and high-resolution ultrasonography: for better records, early detection, and further investigation[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2011, 164(4):605-611.
doi: 10.1530/EJE-10-1095 URL |
[9] |
Bartalena L, Fatourechi V. Extrathyroidal manifestations of Graves' disease: a 2014 update[J]. J Endocrinol Invest, 2014, 37(8):691-700.
doi: 10.1007/s40618-014-0097-2 pmid: 24913238 |
[10] | Kajita Y, Nakajima Y, Ishida M, et al. Comparison of LATS activity and TSH receptor antibody in Graves' di-sease[J]. EndocrinolJpn, 1984, 31(3):369-374. |
[11] |
Weetman AP, Yateman ME, Ealey PA, et al. Thyroid-stimulating antibody activity between different immunoglobulin G subclasses[J]. J Clin Invest, 1990, 86(3):723-727.
pmid: 2168443 |
[12] | Kampmann E, Diana T, Kanitz M, et al. Thyroid stimulating but not blocking autoantibodies are highly prevalent in severe and active thyroid-associated orbitopathy: A prospective study[J]. Int J Endocrinol, 2015, 2015:678194. |
[13] |
Autilio C, Morelli R, Locantore P, et al. Stimulating TSH receptor autoantibodies immunoassay: analytical evaluation and clinical performance in Graves' disease[J]. Ann Clin Biochem, 2018, 55(1):172-177.
doi: 10.1177/0004563217700655 pmid: 28388869 |
[14] |
Zhao SX, Tsui S, Cheung A, et al. Orbital fibrosis in a mouse model of Graves' disease induced by genetic immunization of thyrotropin receptor cDNA[J]. J Endocrinol, 2011, 210(3):369-377.
doi: 10.1530/JOE-11-0162 URL |
[15] |
Cianfarani F, Baldini E, Cavalli A, et al. TSH receptor and thyroid-specific gene expression in human skin[J]. J Invest Dermatol, 2010, 130(1):93-101.
doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.180 pmid: 19641516 |
[16] |
Sedky MM, Fawzy SM, El Baki NA, et al. Systemic sclerosis: an ultrasonographic study of skin and subcutaneous tissue in relation to clinical findings[J]. Skin Res Technol, 2013, 19(1):e78-e84.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2012.00612.x URL |
[17] | 于瑞星, 薛珂, 沈雪, 等. 高频超声检测健康成人皮肤厚度及回声密度[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2019, 52(6):414-419. |
[1] | 刁雪红, 申艳, 陈林, 詹嘉, 方靓, 蔡剑飞, 陈悦. 超声微血流成像技术在临床缓解期类风湿性关节炎诊断中的应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(05): 575-580. |
[2] | 王之倩, 李敏, 于一飞, 周建桥. 21-羟化酶缺陷先天性肾上腺皮质增生患者睾丸肾上腺残基瘤超声特征分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(05): 588-591. |
[3] | 顾炫, 柳俊. 超声筛查鉴别胰腺实性假乳头状瘤与胰腺导管腺癌的研究分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(04): 504-508. |
[4] | 王文涵, 夏蜀珺, 詹维伟. 长链非编码RNA ENST00000489676在超声评估甲状腺乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移中的应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(04): 514-519. |
[5] | 何新, 陈慧, 冯炜炜. 机器学习算法在辅助超声诊断附件肿块良恶性中的应用研究进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(04): 541-546. |
[6] | 杜燕然, 焦景, 任芸芸, 周建桥. 超声影像组学技术在评估胎肺成熟度中的应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(03): 326-330. |
[7] | 桂燕萍, 陈晔芬, 施仲伟, 许燕. 超声心动图右室面积变化分数筛查左心室射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者心脏同步性研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(03): 331-335. |
[8] | 徐琛莹, 李嫣然, 倪晓枫, 徐上妍, 林青. 超声预测老年甲状腺乳头状癌患者颈部淋巴结转移的效能及相关超声征象分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(03): 343-348. |
[9] | 王晨琛, 方跃华, 施仲伟, 屈雪蒸. 25例主动脉瓣成形术后一年的超声心动图评价[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(03): 395-398. |
[10] | 周建桥. 分布式云超声:超声成像系统研发的新路径[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(01): 38-40. |
[11] | 杨伯文, 姜美娇, 陈慧. 超声IOTA简单法鉴别诊断卵巢肿瘤良恶性的临床研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2022, 21(01): 74-79. |
[12] | 曹云云, 王冠杰, 曾敏, 王海飞, 牛建梅, 周雷平. 早孕期超声相关参数预测胚胎妊娠结局价值的分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(05): 445-449. |
[13] | 何碧媛, 周毓青, 姚秉彝, 曹力, 包丽. 中孕期弹性超声成像宫颈机能智能定量分析预测自发性早产的临床应用价值[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(05): 450-455. |
[14] | 杨田, 吉翔, 牛建梅, 孔晓晓, 吕明丽. 二维超声在产前胎儿胸腺发育评估中的应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(05): 471-474. |
[15] | 赵然, 詹维伟, 柳俊. 三维超声监测特发性低促性腺激素性性腺功能减退症无精子患者睾丸体积对患者生精功能的预测价值[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(03): 279-283. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||