Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice ›› 2021, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (03): 239-244.doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2021.03.003
• Interpretation of guidelines • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2020-05-30
Online:
2021-06-25
Published:
2022-06-28
CLC Number:
[1] |
Shaw LJ, Hausleiter J, Achenbach S, et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 60(20):2103-2114.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.062 URL |
[2] | 中华医学会放射学分会质量控制与安全管理专业委员会, 江苏省医学会放射学分会智能影像与质量安全学组. 冠状动脉CT血流储备分数应用中国专家建议[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2020, 54(10):925-933. |
[3] |
Gonzalez JA, Lipinski MJ, Flors L, et al. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography, computed tomography perfusion, and computed tomography-fractional flow reserve in functional myocardial ischemia assessment versus invasive fractional flow reserve[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2015, 116(9):1469-1478.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.078 pmid: 26347004 |
[4] |
Celeng C, Leiner T, Maurovich-Horvat P, et al. Anatomical and functional computed tomography for diagnosing hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2019, 12(7 Pt2):1316-1325.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.022 URL |
[5] |
Kern MJ, Samady H. Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010, 55(3):173-185.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.062 URL |
[6] |
Kawase Y, Matsuo H, Akasaka T, et al. Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics[J]. Cardiovasc Interv Ther, 2019, 34(1):85-96.
doi: 10.1007/s12928-018-0559-0 URL |
[7] |
Nazir MS, Mittal TK, Weir-McCall J, et al. Opportunities and challenges of implementing computed tomography fractional flow reserve into clinical practice[J]. Heart, 2020, 106(18):1387-1393.
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315607 URL |
[8] |
Hadamitzky M, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, et al. Optimized prognostic score for coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM registry (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry)[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 62(5):468-476.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.064 pmid: 23727215 |
[9] |
Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps)[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014, 63(12):1145-1155.
doi: S0735-1097(14)00165-X pmid: 24486266 |
[10] |
Cook CM, Petraco R, Shun-Shin MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2017, 2(7):803-810.
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1314 URL |
[11] |
Driessen RS, Danad I, Stuijfzand WJ, et al. Comparison of coronary computed tomography angiography, fractional flow reserve, and perfusion imaging for ischemia diagnosis[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73(2):161-173.
doi: S0735-1097(18)39138-1 pmid: 30654888 |
[12] |
Dai N, Zhang X, Zhang Y, et al. Enhanced diagnostic utility achieved by myocardial blood analysis: a meta-analysis of noninvasive cardiac imaging in the detection of functional coronary artery disease[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2016, 221:665-673.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.031 URL |
[13] |
Rønnow Sand NP, Nissen L, Winther S, et al. Prediction of coronary revascularization in stable angina: comparison of FFR CT with CMR stress perfusion imaging[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020, 13(4):994-1004.
doi: S1936-878X(19)30636-9 pmid: 31422146 |
[14] |
Patel MR, Nørgaard BL, Fairbairn TA, et al. 1-year impact on medical practice and clinical outcomes of FFR(CT): The ADVANCE Registry[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020, 13(1 Pt 1):97-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.003 URL |
[15] |
Curzen NP, Nolan J, Zaman AG, et al. Does the routine availability of CT-derived FFR influence management of patients with stable chest pain compared to CT angiography alone: The FFR CT RIPCORD Study[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 9(10):1188-1194.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.026 URL |
[16] |
Collet C, Miyazaki Y, Ryan N, et al. Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomographic angiography in patients with multivessel CAD[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 71(24):2756-2769.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.053 URL |
[17] | Collet C, Onuma Y, Andreini D, et al. Coronary compu-ted tomography angiography for heart team decision-ma-king in multivessel coronary artery disease[J]. Eur Heart J, 2018, 39(41):3689-3698. |
[18] |
Cook CM, Petraco R, Shun-Shin MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2017, 2(7):803-810.
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1314 URL |
[19] |
Kim KH, Doh JH, Koo BK, et al. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2014, 7(1):72-78.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.024 URL |
[20] |
Wolfrum M, de Maria GL, Benenati S, et al. What are the causes of a suboptimal FFR after coronary stent deployment? Insights from a consecutive series using OCT imaging[J]. EuroIntervention, 2018, 14(12):e1324-e1331.
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00071 URL |
[21] |
Hakeem A, Uretsky BF. Role of postintervention fractio-nal flow reserve to improve procedural and clinical outcomes[J]. Circulation, 2019, 139(5):694-706.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035837 pmid: 30689413 |
[22] |
Lee CH, Choi SW, Hwang J, et al. 5-Year Outcomes according to FFR of left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2019, 12(9):847-855.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.037 URL |
[23] |
de Maria GL, Alkhalil M, Wolfrum M, et al. Index of microcirculatory resistance as a tool to characterize microvascular obstruction and to predict Infarct size regression in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2019, 12(5):837-848.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.018 URL |
[24] |
Rahman H, Corcoran D, Aetesam-Ur-Rahman M, et al. Diagnosis of patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary disease in the catheter laboratory[J]. Heart, 2019, 105(20):1536-1542.
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315042 URL |
[25] |
Lu MT, Ferencik M, Roberts RS, et al. Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography: management and outcomes in the PROMISE Trial[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017, 10(11):1350-1358.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.024 URL |
[26] |
Pontone G, Weir-McCall JR, Baggiano A, et al. Determinants of rejection rate for coronary CT angiography fractional flow reserve analysis[J]. Radiology, 2019, 292(3):597-605.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182673 URL |
[27] |
Ferencik M, Lu MT, Mayrhofer T, et al. Non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with acute chest pain: subgroup analysis of the ROMICAT II trial[J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2019, 13(4):196-202.
doi: S1934-5925(18)30409-X pmid: 31113728 |
[28] |
Kawaji T, Shiomi H, Morishita H, et al. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017, 33(2):271-281.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0995-9 URL |
[29] |
Rabbat M, Leipsic J, Bax J, et al. Fractional Flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography safely defers invasive coronary angiography in patients with stable coronary artery disease[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(2):604.
doi: 10.3390/jcm9020604 URL |
[30] |
Li S, Chen C, Qin L, et al. The impact of iterative reconstruction algorithms on machine learning-based coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR ML) values[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020, 36(6):1177-1185.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01807-7 URL |
[31] |
Leipsic J, Yang TH, Thompson A, et al. CT angiography (CTA) and diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic CTA (DeFACTO) study[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2014, 202(5):989-994.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11441 URL |
[32] |
Modi BN, Sankaran S, Kim HJ, et al. Predicting the Physiological Effect of Revascularization in Serially Disea-sed Coronary Arteries[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2019, 12(2):e007577.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007577 URL |
[33] |
Tesche C, Otani K, de Cecco CN, et al. Influence of coronary calcium on diagnostic performance of machine learning CT-FFR: results from MACHINE registry[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020, 13(3):760-770.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.027 URL |
[34] |
Kawaji T, Shiomi H, Morishita H, et al. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017, 33(2):271-281.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0995-9 URL |
[35] |
Ihdayhid AR, Norgaard BL, Gaur S, et al. Prognostic value and risk continuum of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography[J]. Radiology, 2019, 292(2):343-351.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182264 pmid: 31184558 |
[36] |
Takagi H, Ishikawa Y, Orii M, et al. Optimized interpretation of fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography: Comparison of three interpretation methods[J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2019, 13(2):134-141.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.10.027 URL |
[1] | . [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2021, 20(04): 349-355. |
[2] | SHENG Hong, ZHANG Andi. Study on application of nutritional risk screening in hospitalized patients with chronic heart failure [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2021, 20(02): 178-183. |
[3] | WU Jie, FENG Yuanyuan, REN Yan, CAO Jiumei. Survey of risk factors of coronary heart disease in elderly patients with coronary angiography and establishment of relevant diagnostic model [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2021, 20(02): 201-206. |
[4] | ZHA Qing, YU Chenxi, LIU Ya, YANG Ling, YE Jiawen, LIU Yan. Preliminary study on the role of miR-16 in progression of coronary atherosclerosis and possible molecular mechanism [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2021, 20(01): 82-87. |
[5] | LIU Shengjun, LIU Lili, ZHU Zhengbin, SUN Yi, ZHU Tianqi, FENG Shuo, CHEN Xin, QUAN Weiwei, ZHANG Ruiyan. Correlation of estimated glomerular filtration rate with incidence of in-stent restenosis in patients with drug-elu-ting stent [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2020, 19(03): 297-302. |
[6] | LIU Shanshan, Niu Jingya, WANG Tiange, LI Mian, ZHAO Zhiyun, XU Yu, LU Jieli, XU Min, BI Yufang, ZHANG Di. Epidemiological investigation on cardiometabolic abnormalities in Songnan Community residents with type 2 diabetes [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(03): 323-328. |
[7] | . [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(2): 237-240. |
[8] | HUANG Xiaoyi, CAI Wei, SHU Shizhen, PANG Xiaofen. Correlation of glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting blood glucose level with severity of lesion in elderly patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(1): 82-85. |
[9] | . [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2017, 16(06): 664-667. |
[10] | LING Yuan, WANG Shuhong, LIANG Wei, SHEN Linhui. Study on correlation of serum level of C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 1(CTRP1) with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2017, 16(02): 199-203. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||