外科理论与实践 ›› 2023, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (01): 77-82.doi: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2023.01.13

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

简易支撑架联合一针缝合法在直肠癌末端回肠造口中的应用

胡磊1, 许亚龙2, 刘少军1, 何义仁1, 刘流1, 朱志强1()   

  1. 1.中国科学技术大学附属第一医院(安徽省立医院)普外科,安徽 合肥 230001
    2.皖南医学院研究生学院,安徽 芜湖 241000
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-25 出版日期:2023-01-25 发布日期:2023-03-25
  • 通讯作者: 朱志强 E-mail:847412565@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81802329);中央高校基本科研专项资金(WK911000038);中国科学技术大学附属第一医院(安徽省立医院)博士科研启动基金(RC2021014)

Application of simple support bracket combined with one stitch suture in terminal ileostomy of rectal cancer

HU Lei1, XU Yalong2, LIU Shaojun1, HE Yiren1, LIU Liu1, ZHU Zhiqiang1()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui Hefei 230001, China
    2. Graduate School, Wannan Medical College, Anhui Wuhu 241000, China
  • Received:2022-01-25 Online:2023-01-25 Published:2023-03-25
  • Contact: ZHU Zhiqiang E-mail:847412565@qq.com

摘要:

目的:探讨低位直肠癌病人保肛根治手术中,应用简易支撑架联合一针缝合行末端回肠双腔造口的可行性及效果。 方法 回顾性分析2019年12月至2021年5月我院普外科有术后吻合口漏高危因素的直肠癌病人。病人行腹腔镜辅助低位直肠癌根治术和末端回肠双腔造口术。分为简易支撑架联合一针缝合造口组35例,传统缝合造口组35例。术前、术后资料行统计学分析。结果: 两组病人一般资料及术后造口相关并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有病人住院期间均未出现严重并发症。所有病人末端回肠造口均成功还纳。简易支撑架联合一针缝合造口组病人一期造口时间[(13.77±2.02) min比(22.66±3.64)min(P<0.001)];二期造口还纳时间[(88.14±28.03) min比(103.29±30.96) min(P=0.04)]和术后总住院时间[(14.54±2.32) d比(17.34±4.57) d(P=0.002)];以及一期手术住院费用[(42 057.98±4 938.69)元比(44 728.46±5 223.62)元,(P=0.03)]和二期造口还纳手术出血量[(17.94±9.83) mL比(25.86±8.24) mL(P=0.001)]均少于传统缝合造口组,差异具有统计学意义。结论:相比传统缝合造口,简易支撑架联合一针缝合造口术后造口相关并发症并未增加,但造口手术时间和二期还纳时间缩短,住院费用减少,可用于低位直肠癌的预防性造口手术。

关键词: 直肠癌, 造口, 简易支撑架, 一针缝合法

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the feasibility and effect of simple support bracket combined with one stitch suture in terminal ileostomy of two stomas during anus-preserving radical resection in low rectal cancer patients. Methods Retrospectively analysis was performed for rectal cancer patients with high risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage, who admitted to the Department of General Surgery our hospital from December 2019 to May 2021. The patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted low rectal cancer radical resection and terminal ileostomy. There were two groups including 35 patients in the group of simple bracket combined with one stitch suture, and 35 patients in the group of conventional suture. Preoperative and postoperative clinical data were analyzed. Results General data of two groups were similar. No difference statistical significantly in the rate of postoperative stoma‐related complications between the two groups ((P>0.05). All patients were without any severe complications. All stomas were successfully closed. The time of first-stage ileostomy (13.77±2.02) min vs. (22.66±3.64) min (P<0.001), second-stage stoma closure time (88.14±28.03) min vs. (103.29±30.96) min (P=0.04), and postoperative total time in hospital (14.54±2.32) d vs. (17.34±4.57) d (P=0.002) were shorter in simple bracket combined with one stitch suture group; both total cost in the hospital of first-stage operation (42 057.98±4 938.69) yuan vs. (44 728.46±5 223.62) yuan (P=0.03), and second-stage stoma closure blood loss (17.94±9.83) mL vs. (25.86±8.24) mL (P=0.001) lower compared with that in conventional suture group. Conclusions Simple support bracket combined with one stitch suture ileostomy did not increase postoperative stoma-related complications compared with conventional suture. However, it decreased the time for both first-stage ileostomy and second-stage stoma closure, and total cost in hospital. Therefore, it could be used for prophylactic ileostomy in low rectal cancer.

Key words: Rectal cancer, Stoma, Simple support bracket, One stitch suture

中图分类号: